An experimental evaluation of the impact of heterogeneous scenarios and virtualization on the available bandwidth estimation tools

Mobile Broadband (MBB) access networks are becoming more and more used worldwide, and the devices adopted to access them are increasing in number and complexity (smart-phones, mobile hotspots, vehicular infotainment systems). The highly dynamic nature of such scenarios calls for continuous monitoring and measurement of the network. To this aim, the Available Bandwidth is a performance metric of the utmost importance, albeit hard to estimate in uncontrolled scenarios. Shared experimental testbeds such as MONROE are becoming available to offer in-the-field MBB experimenting facilities. In this context, the SOMETIME project is focused on providing MONROE and similar testbeds with the tools to measure Available Bandwidth in MBB scenarios, also taking advantage of the benefit of SDN to perform active and passive measurements. In line with experimental activities planned by the project roadmap, in this paper we discuss the suitability of a number of publicly released ABw estimation tools when run in heterogeneous scenarios. Experimental results confirm that (i) the experimental scenario in which the tools run heavily impacts their performance in terms of accuracy; (ii) the entity of cross-traffic may have different effects on some of the tools, unacceptably undermining the estimation accuracy, depending on limitations of both the specific tools and the setup.

[1]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Challenges and solution for measuring available bandwidth in software defined networks , 2017, Comput. Commun..

[2]  Marco Ajmone Marsan,et al.  Measuring and assessing mobile broadband networks with MONROE , 2016, 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM).

[3]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  pathChirp: Efficient available bandwidth estimation for network paths , 2003 .

[4]  L. Angrisani,et al.  Measuring wireless links capacity , 2006, 2006 1st International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing.

[5]  Manish Jain,et al.  End-to-end available bandwidth: measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with TCP throughput , 2002, SIGCOMM 2002.

[6]  Salvatore D'Antonio,et al.  Techniques for available bandwidth measurement in IP networks: A performance comparison , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Emanuele Goldoni,et al.  End-to-End Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools, An Experimental Comparison , 2010, TMA.

[8]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  SOMETIME: Software defined network-basec Available Bandwidth measurement in MONROE , 2017, 2017 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA).

[9]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Unified architecture for network measurement: The case of available bandwidth , 2012, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[10]  Jitendra Padhye,et al.  Bandwidth estimation in broadband access networks , 2004, IMC '04.

[11]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Laboratory-based calibration of available bandwidth estimation tools , 2007, Microprocess. Microsystems.

[12]  Emanuele Goldoni,et al.  Assolo, a New Method for Available Bandwidth Estimation , 2009, 2009 Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection.

[13]  D. Martin Swany,et al.  Comparison of end-to-end bandwidth measurement tools on the 10GigE TeraGrid backbone , 2005, The 6th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing, 2005..

[14]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  A tool for the generation of realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Alok Shriram,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Techniques for Measuring Available Bandwidth , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[16]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Experimental evaluation and characterization of the magnets wireless backbone , 2006, WINTECH.

[17]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  On the performance of the wide-area networks interconnecting public-cloud datacenters around the globe , 2017, Comput. Networks.

[18]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Cloud monitoring: Definitions, issues and future directions , 2012, 2012 IEEE 1st International Conference on Cloud Networking (CLOUDNET).

[19]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  MagNets - experiences from deploying a joint research-operational next-generation wireless access network testbed , 2007, 2007 3rd International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructure for the Development of Networks and Communities.

[20]  Hongqiang Zhai,et al.  Available bandwidth in multirate and multihop wireless ad hoc networks , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.