Speech pronunciation practice system for speech-impaired children: a systematic review of impacts and functionality

There are many systems in the field of speech therapy, and each offers different features. Identifying the effects of these systems on speech learning of children and proper features for selection of an effective speech pronunciation practice (SPP) system for children is an important issue for speech therapists. Therefore, analysing the impacts and functionality of the current SPP systems can help software developers find the essential features for designing an effective SPP system and also assist the therapists to select an appropriate system for children. To address the above issues, a literature review was conducted to find the desired features and characteristics for designing an effective SPP system for children and identify the shortcomings of the current speech pronunciation practice systems. To conduct this systematic review, the researchers followed a defined procedure designed by Kitchenham (Procedures for performing systematic reviews, Keele University, Keele, 2004). From 229 initial papers found in five research databases, 11 relevant papers were extracted based on the inclusion criteria. The SPP systems were summarised in terms of these factors: (a) purpose(s) and experimental type; (b) experimental results; (c) main features; (d) different types of each feature; (e) platform; (f) user interface characteristics; and (g) practising method. The results indicated that: (a) experimental results of all systems were positive, and patients and therapists were satisfied with SPP systems; (b) user profiles, feedback, reports, user interface and practising method are five elements of SPP systems which can have direct effect on system effectiveness; and (c) appropriate reporting systems and user interfaces are ignored in most SPP systems. We conclude that an appropriate SPP system can increase children’s enthusiasm to participate in therapy sessions and improves their concentration and performance during the sessions. Furthermore, we present the most-used type of each main element of SPP systems and indicate the potential positive features based on the shortcomings of the current systems.

[1]  Martin J. Russell,et al.  The STAR system: an interactive pronunciation tutor for young children , 2000, Comput. Speech Lang..

[2]  E. Toki,et al.  E-learning activities for articulation in speech language therapy and learning for preschool children , 2010 .

[3]  Bruno Arnaldi,et al.  Adaptability properties of a Collaborative Virtual Environment for Training , 2017 .

[4]  C. Vaquero,et al.  VOCALIZA: AN APPLICATION FOR COMPUTER-AIDED SPEECH THERAPY IN SPANISH LANGUAGE , 2006 .

[5]  M. Danubianu,et al.  Distributed Intelligent System for Personalized Therapy of Speech Disorders , 2008, 2008 The Third International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (iccgi 2008).

[6]  Md. Mustafizur Rahman,et al.  Increasing Intelligibility in the Speech of the Autistic Children by an Interactive Computer Game , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.

[7]  Dogan Ibrahim,et al.  A Mobile Tool for Learning English Words. , 2008 .

[8]  Athina A. Lazakidou.  Web-Based Applications in Healthcare and Biomedicine , 2010, Web-Based Applications in Healthcare and Biomedicine.

[9]  Dalbir Singh,et al.  An investigation on Ribbon interface design guidelines for people with less computer literacy , 2014, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[10]  Klára Vicsi,et al.  A Multimedia, Multilingual Teaching and Training System for Children with Speech Disorders , 2000, Int. J. Speech Technol..

[11]  Deng Hao,et al.  Study on Chinese college students' beliefs and attitude towards Autonomous Language Learning in computer-assisted language learning environment , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Mechatronic Science, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC).

[12]  Chung-Hsien Wu,et al.  An Articulation Training System with Intelligent Interface and Multimode Feedbacks to Articulation Disorders , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Asian Language Processing.

[13]  Haideh Mokhtari.  Iranian EFL Learners’ Attitude Towards CALL☆ , 2013 .

[14]  Richard Pinner,et al.  Teachers’ attitudes to and motivations for using CALL in and around the language classroom , 2012 .

[15]  Selçuk Özdemir,et al.  Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning with Mobile Technologies , 2013 .

[16]  Nasser Saleh Al-Mansour,et al.  The effect of computer-assisted instruction on Saudi University students’ learning of English , 2012 .

[17]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[18]  Laleh Aghlara,et al.  The effect of digital games on Iranian children's vocabulary retention in foreign language acquisition , 2011 .

[19]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Abaris: Evaluating Automated Capture Applied to Structured Autism Interventions , 2005, UbiComp.

[20]  Amir Marzban,et al.  Improvement of reading comprehension through computer-assisted language learning in Iranian intermediate EFL students , 2011, WCIT.

[21]  Yan Sufeng,et al.  Computer-Assisted Language Learning in higher education , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education.

[22]  Hassina Nachoua,et al.  Computer-Assisted Language Learning for Improving Students’ Listening Skill , 2012 .

[23]  Ingrid Kirschning,et al.  Vowel & diphthong tutors for language therapy , 2005, Sixth Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC'05).

[24]  N. Cagiltay,et al.  A serious game for speech disorder children therapy , 2012, 2012 7th International Symposium on Health Informatics and Bioinformatics.

[25]  Noor Zainab Abdul Razak,et al.  Using Internet for Learning Vocabulary among Second Language Learners in a Suburban School , 2012 .

[26]  Heikki Lyytinen,et al.  Children's engagement during digital game-based learning of reading: The effects of time, rewards, and challenge , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Siti Salwah Salim,et al.  Gamification Solutions to Enhance Software User Engagement—A Systematic Review , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Ghasem Barani,et al.  The Relationship between Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) and Listening Skill of Iranian EFL Learners , 2011 .

[29]  Oscar Saz-Torralba,et al.  A prelingual tool for the education of altered voices , 2012, Speech Commun..

[30]  Yıldız Turgut,et al.  Young learners’ language learning via computer games , 2009 .

[31]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-Learning and Games: Learning by Playing. Game-based Education System Design and Development , 2009 .

[32]  Naely Muchtar.  An Overview Of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning , 2018 .

[33]  Florence Martin,et al.  Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Oscar Saz-Torralba,et al.  COMUNICA - tools for speech and language therapy , 2008, WOCCI.

[35]  Olle Bälter,et al.  Wizard-of-Oz test of ARTUR: a computer-based speech training system with articulation correction , 2005, Assets '05.

[36]  Mehrak Rahimi,et al.  The impact of computer-based activities on Iranian high-school students' attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning , 2011, WCIT.