Morphological pyramids with alternating sequential filters

The aim of this paper is to find a relationship between alternating sequential filters (ASF) and the morphological sampling theorem (MST) developed by Haralick et al. (1987). The motivation behind this approach is to take advantage of the computational efficiency offered by the MST to implement morphological operations. First, we show alternative proofs for opening and closing in the sampled and unsampled domain using the basis functions. These proofs are important because they show that it possible to obtain any level of a morphological pyramid in one step rather than the traditional two-step procedure. This decomposition is then used to show the relationship of the open-closing in the sampled and unsampled domain. An upper and a lower bound, for the above relationships, are presented. Under certain circumstances, an equivalence is shown for open-closing between the sampled and the unsampled domain. An extension to more complicated algorithms using a union of openings and an intersection of closings is also proposed. Using the Hausdorff metric, it is shown that a morphologically reconstructed image cannot have a better accuracy than twice the radius of the reconstruction structuring element. Binary and gray scale examples are presented.

[1]  M.-H. Chen,et al.  A Multiscanning Approach Based on Morphological Filtering , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  J. Goutsias,et al.  Optimal Morphological Pattern Restoration from Noisy Binary Images , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Morphological filters-Part II: Their relations to median, order-statistic, and stack filters , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Optimal mean-square N-observation digital morphological filters : I. Optimal binary filters , 1992, CVGIP Image Underst..

[5]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Morphological sampling , 1991, CVGIP Image Underst..

[6]  Xinhua Zhuang,et al.  Image Analysis Using Mathematical Morphology , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Stephen S. Wilson Training of object classes using mathematical morphology , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[9]  Aldo W. Morales,et al.  An image pyramid with morphological operators , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Edward J. Delp,et al.  The analysis of morphological filters with multiple structuring elements , 1990, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[11]  G. Arce,et al.  Morphological filters: Statistics and further syntactic properties , 1987 .

[12]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[13]  Peter J. Burt,et al.  Smart sensing within a pyramid vision machine , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  Sung-Jea Ko,et al.  Matrix representation of composite morphological function processing systems , 1993, Proceedings of 36th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[15]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[16]  Stanley R Sternberg,et al.  Grayscale morphology , 1986 .

[17]  Alexander Toet A hierarchical morphological image decomposition , 1990, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[18]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Morphologic edge detection , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[19]  Sung-Jea Ko,et al.  Optimal grayscale morphological filters under the LMS algorithm , 1993, Proceedings of 36th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[20]  Xinhua Zhuang,et al.  The digital morphological sampling theorem , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[21]  Alexander Toet,et al.  A morphological pyramidal image decomposition , 1989, Pattern Recognit. Lett..