How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?

The primary distinguishing feature of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is that sets of items that are administered to examinees are specifically selected for each examinee during the test process. This implies that examinees who respond differently to items on a test will get different sets of test items. However, if an item bank is small, if there are strict content constraints, or if there is strong exposure control, there might not be much adaptation during the test. Examinees who perform differently might get many of the same test items. The research reported here recommends some statistical indicators of how much adaptation is taking place and shows how these indicators vary for different kinds of adaptive test designs. Guidelines are provided for the values of the statistics indicating that a CAT is strongly adaptive.

[2]  David J. Weiss The Stratified Adaptive Computerized Ability Test. , 1973 .

[3]  Ying Cheng When Cognitive Diagnosis Meets Computerized Adaptive Testing: CD-CAT , 2009 .

[4]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Strategies of Adaptive Ability Measurement. , 1974 .

[5]  William A. Sands,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. , 1997 .

[6]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Testlet Response Theory: An Analog for the 3PL Model Useful in Testlet-Based Adaptive Testing , 2000 .

[7]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  Designing item pools to optimize the functioning of a computerized adaptive test , 2010 .

[8]  Alfred Binet,et al.  A Method of Measuring the Development of the Intelligence of Young Children , 1914 .

[9]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  A Method for Severely Constrained Item Selection in Adaptive Testing , 1992 .

[10]  Duanli Yan,et al.  Computerized multistage testing : theory and applications , 2014 .

[11]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  A Model for Optimal Constrained Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[12]  Elvira Germino Hausken,et al.  Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K) Psychometric Report for the Third Grade , 2005 .

[13]  Melvin R. Novick,et al.  Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability , 1966 .

[14]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  A Procedure for Decision Making Using Tailored Testing , 1983 .

[15]  Sewon Kim,et al.  Some Measures of the Amount of Adaptation for Computerized Adaptive Tests , 2017 .