An Investigation of University Students’ Collaborative Inquiry Learning Behaviors in an Augmented Reality Simulation and a Traditional Simulation

The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare students’ collaborative inquiry learning behaviors and their behavior patterns in an augmented reality (AR) simulation system and a traditional 2D simulation system. Their inquiry and discussion processes were analyzed by content analysis and lag sequential analysis (LSA). Forty university students were divided into dyads and then randomly assigned into AR group and traditional 2D group to collaboratively conduct an inquiry task about elastic collision. The results of the content analysis and LSA indicated that both systems supported students’ collaborative inquiry learning. Particularly, students showed high frequencies on higher-level inquiry behaviors, such as interpreting experimental data or making conclusions, when using these two simulations. By comparing the behavioral patterns, similarities and differences between the two groups were revealed. The AR simulation engaged the students more thoroughly in the inquiry process. Moreover, students in both groups adopted the same approaches to design experiments. Due to the line of AR research is in its initial stage, suggestions for future studies were proposed.

[1]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG) , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Identifying patterns of collaborative knowledge exploration in online asynchronous discussions , 2011 .

[3]  Eric Klopfer,et al.  Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games , 2008 .

[4]  T. Jong,et al.  The Relation between Prior Knowledge and Students' Collaborative Discovery Learning Processes. , 2005 .

[5]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning , 2006 .

[7]  David Rosengrant,et al.  Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts , 2003, 1602.06497.

[8]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Interaction between tool and talk: how instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[9]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[10]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[11]  Manuel Castro,et al.  New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[12]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning. , 2011 .

[13]  Óscar Reinoso,et al.  Real-time collaboration of virtual laboratories through the Internet , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[15]  Lars Bollen,et al.  Validating and Optimizing the Effects of Model Progression in Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning , 2012 .

[16]  T. Bryce,et al.  Momentum and Kinetic Energy: Confusable Concepts in Secondary School Physics. , 2009 .

[17]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  An investigation of learners' collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for Distance Education chemistry students , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers,et al.  The Effects of Gender Interaction Patterns on Student Participation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation , 2006 .

[20]  Jan T. van der Veen,et al.  The learning effects of computer simulations in science education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[22]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[23]  D. Klahr,et al.  Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[25]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Mobile guide system using problem-solving strategy for museum learning: a sequential learning behavioural pattern analysis , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[26]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Face to face collaborative AR on mobile phones , 2005, Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'05).

[27]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Thought experiments and collaborative learning in physics , 1998 .

[28]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[29]  Rod Sims,et al.  Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access , 2011, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[30]  Kuo-En Chang,et al.  Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge-sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy , 2009 .

[31]  Milena K. Nigam,et al.  The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning , 2022 .

[32]  R. Sawyer The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[33]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[34]  R. Ploetzner,et al.  Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, tools, and challenges , 2010 .

[35]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[36]  Sufen Chen,et al.  The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[38]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Preservice teachers' theory development in physical and simulated environments , 2006 .

[39]  Siu Cheung Kong,et al.  An experience of teaching for learning by observation: Remote-controlled experiments on electrical circuits , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[41]  E. Harskamp,et al.  Structured Collaboration versus Individual Learning in Solving Physics Problems , 2006 .

[42]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature , 2012 .

[44]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research , 2012, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[46]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[47]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Applying lag sequential analysis to detect visual behavioural patterns of online learning activities , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[48]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers , 2004, Comput. Educ..