A general and flexible approach to estimating the social relations model using Bayesian methods.

The social relations model (SRM) is a conceptual, methodological, and analytical approach that is widely used to examine dyadic behaviors and interpersonal perception within groups. This article introduces a general and flexible approach to estimating the parameters of the SRM that is based on Bayesian methods using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. The Bayesian approach overcomes several statistical problems that have plagued SRM researchers. First, it provides a single unified approach to estimating SRM parameters that can be easily extended to more specialized models (e.g., measurement models, moderator variables, categorical outcome variables). Second, sampling-based Bayesian methods allow statistically reliable inferences to be made about variance components and correlations, even with small sample sizes. Third, the Bayesian approach is able to handle designs with missing data. In a simulation study, the statistical properties (bias, root-mean-square error, coverage rate) of the parameter estimates produced by the Bayesian approach are compared with those of the method of moment estimates that have been used in previous research. A data example is presented to illustrate how discrete person moderators can be included in SRM analyses using the Bayesian approach. Finally, further extensions of the SRM are discussed, and suggestions for applied research are made.

[1]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences , 2009 .

[2]  G. Y. Wong Round Robin Analysis of Variance via Maximum Likelihood , 1982 .

[3]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[4]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Individual differences in dyadic cooperative learning. , 1998 .

[5]  E. Loken,et al.  A UNIFIED THEORY OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND INFERENCE FOR VARIANCE COMPONENT MODELS FOR DYADIC DATA , 2002 .

[6]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R , 2005 .

[7]  William J. Browne,et al.  Non-Hierarchical Multilevel Models , 2008 .

[8]  D. Draper Bayesian Multilevel Analysis and MCMC , 2008 .

[9]  M. Wand,et al.  General design Bayesian generalized linear mixed models , 2006, math/0606491.

[10]  P. S. Gill,et al.  Statistical analyses for round robin interaction data , 2001 .

[11]  Virginia S Y Kwan,et al.  Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: a componential approach. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Brian R. Lashley,et al.  Round-robin analysis of social interaction: Exact and estimated standard errors , 1996 .

[13]  Joseph A. Bonito,et al.  The measurement of reliability of social relations components from round-robin designs , 2010 .

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis , 1988 .

[15]  Kimberly S. Maier,et al.  Using a Multivariate Multilevel Polytomous Item Response Theory Model to Study Parallel Processes of Change: The Dynamic Association Between Adolescents' Social Isolation and Engagement With Delinquent Peers in the National Youth Survey , 2010, Multivariate behavioral research.

[16]  L. Harlow,et al.  What if there were no significance tests , 1997 .

[17]  Todd D. Little,et al.  Gender effects in peer nominations for aggression and social status , 2005 .

[18]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: an interpersonal approach. , 2004, Psychological review.

[20]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[21]  C. Robert,et al.  Bayesian Modeling Using WinBUGS , 2009 .

[22]  R. Kass,et al.  Reference Bayesian Methods for Generalized Linear Mixed Models , 2000 .

[23]  Bernadette Park,et al.  A social relations analysis of agreement in liking judgments. , 1989 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Social Relations Model , 1984 .

[25]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[26]  Henry Lynn,et al.  Comparison of Software Algorithms for Calculating REML Wald Type Confidence Limits for the Between-Group Variance Component in a Small Sample One-Way Random Effects Model Example , 2010 .

[27]  Brian R. Lashley,et al.  Significance testing for round robin data. , 1997 .

[28]  Stefano Livi,et al.  A componential analysis of leadership using the social relations model , 2009 .

[29]  J. Kruschke Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS , 2010 .

[30]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[31]  Susan J. Curry,et al.  Extended Generalized Linear Latent and Mixed Model , 2008 .

[32]  William J. Browne,et al.  Bayesian and likelihood-based methods in multilevel modeling 1 A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models , 2006 .

[33]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  A double-structure structural equation model for three-mode data. , 2008, Psychological methods.

[34]  Jennifer G. Boldry,et al.  Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective. , 1999 .

[35]  Tim B. Swartz,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Dyadic Data , 2007 .

[36]  Simine Vazire,et al.  Perceiver effects as projective tests: what your perceptions of others say about you. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Felix D. Schönbrodt,et al.  TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[38]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members , 1982 .

[39]  Brian R. Lashley,et al.  Power estimation in social relations analyses , 1998 .

[40]  W. Chaplin,et al.  Social competence and depression: the role of illusory self-perceptions. , 1980, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[41]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  A First Course in Bayesian Statistical Methods , 2009 .

[42]  G. Casella,et al.  Explaining the Gibbs Sampler , 1992 .

[43]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[44]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[45]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Perceiving Others' Personalities: Examining the Dimensionality, Assumed Similarity to the Self, and Stability of Perceiver Effects Perceiver Effects: Definitional and Conceptual Issues , 2010 .

[46]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[47]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach , 1999 .

[48]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Bayesian mediation analysis. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[49]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Bilinear Mixed-Effects Models for Dyadic Data , 2005 .

[51]  E. Hamaker,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Multilevel Models , 2010 .

[52]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A New Round Robin Analysis of Variance for Social Interaction Data , 1979 .

[53]  Sik-Yum Lee Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach , 2007 .

[54]  S. Chib,et al.  Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm , 1995 .

[55]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Analyzing Structural Relations in Multivariate Dyadic Binary Data , 2009, AMR 2009.

[56]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo conver-gence diagnostics: a comparative review , 1996 .