Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of escalating doses of the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors and to study whether G-CSF scheduling variably affects the ability to escalate TPT doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients received 121 courses of TPT as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks at doses that ranged from 2.0 to 4.2 mg/m2/d. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) was initiated concurrently with TPT (starting on day 1). Because the concurrent administration of TPT and G-CSF resulted in severe myelosuppression at the lowest TPT dose level, an alternate posttreatment G-CSF schedule in which G-CSF dosing began after TPT (starting on day 6) was subsequently evaluated. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT and to determine whether G-CSF altered the pharmacokinetic profile of TPT. RESULTS Severe myelosuppression precluded the administration of TPT at the first dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d, with G-CSF on the concurrent schedule. However, dose escalation of TPT with G-CSF on a posttreatment schedule proceeded to 4.2 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. One partial response was noted in a patient with colorectal carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidines. Pharmacokinetics were linear within the dosing range of 2.0 to 3.5 mg/m2/d, but TPT clearance was lower at the 4.2-mg/m2/d dose level. At 3.5 mg/m2/d, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for subsequent-phase studies of TPT with G-CSF, the area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUCs) for total TPT and lactone averaged 2.2- and 2.3-fold higher, respectively, than the AUCs achieved at the lowest TPT dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d. The pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT was not significantly altered by the scheduling of G-CSF. CONCLUSION G-CSF administered after 5 daily 30-minute infusions of TPT permits a 2.3-fold dose escalation of TPT above the MTD in solid-tumor patients, whereas concurrent therapy with G-CSF and TPT results in severe myelosuppression.

[1]  D. Toppmeyer,et al.  A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a new camptothecin derivative, 9-aminocamptothecin. , 1995, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  P. Hérait,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic studies of the camptothecin analog irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in cancer patients. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  L. Grochow,et al.  Phase I and pharmacodynamic study of the topoisomerase I-inhibitor topotecan in patients with refractory acute leukemia. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  W. Furman,et al.  Phase I study of topotecan for pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  C. Osborne,et al.  Failure of GM-CSF to permit dose-escalation in an every other week dose-intensive regimen for advanced breast cancer. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  J. Radford,et al.  Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in lymphoma and leukemia using a single apheresis , 1993 .

[7]  L. Liu,et al.  Interaction between replication forks and topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complexes: studies in a cell-free SV40 DNA replication system. , 1993, Cancer research.

[8]  L. Saltz,et al.  Phase I clinical and pharmacology study of topotecan given daily for 5 consecutive days to patients with advanced solid tumors, with attempt at dose intensification using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  L. Zwelling,et al.  Phase I study of Topotecan, a new topoisomerase I inhibitor, in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia , 1993 .

[10]  E K Rowinsky,et al.  The current status of camptothecin analogues as antitumor agents. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Clark Da,et al.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor with dose-intensified treatment of cancer. , 1992 .

[12]  M. Moore Does stem cell exhaustion result from combining hematopoietic growth factors with chemotherapy? If so, how do we prevent it? , 1992, Blood.

[13]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Characterization of camptothecin-resistant Chinese hamster lung cells. , 1992, Biochemical pharmacology.

[14]  L. Grochow,et al.  Effect of P-glycoprotein expression on the accumulation and cytotoxicity of topotecan (SK&F 104864), a new camptothecin analogue. , 1992, Cancer research.

[15]  M. Fukuoka,et al.  Phase I study of weekly intravenous infusions of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  M. Moore Review: Stratton Lecture 1990. Clinical implications of positive and negative hematopoietic stem cell regulators. , 1991, Blood.

[17]  J. Kahn,et al.  Clinical and virologic effects of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients receiving chemotherapy for human immunodeficiency virus-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a randomized trial. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  J. Boehm,et al.  Synthesis of water-soluble (aminoalkyl)camptothecin analogs: inhibition of topoisomerase I and antitumor activity , 1991 .

[19]  D. Martin,et al.  Hematologic effects of interleukin-1 beta, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in tumor-bearing mice treated with fluorouracil. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  K. Kohn,et al.  Structure-activity study of the actions of camptothecin derivatives on mammalian topoisomerase I: evidence for a specific receptor site and a relation to antitumor activity. , 1989, Cancer research.

[21]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  Modification of the hydroxy lactone ring of camptothecin: inhibition of mammalian topoisomerase I and biological activity. , 1989, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  R. Sternglanz,et al.  Evidence that DNA topoisomerase I is necessary for the cytotoxic effects of camptothecin. , 1988, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  L. Liu,et al.  Identification of mammalian DNA topoisomerase I as an intracellular target of the anticancer drug camptothecin. , 1988, Cancer research.

[24]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  Muggia Fm,et al.  Plasma camptothecin (NSC-100880) levels during a 5-day course of treatment: relation to dose and toxicity. , 1972 .

[26]  H. Hansen,et al.  Phase I clinical trial of weekly and daily treatment with camptothecin (NSC-100880): correlation with preclinical studies. , 1972, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[27]  Gottlieb Ja,et al.  Treatment of malignant melanoma with camptothecin (NSC-100880). , 1972 .

[28]  R J Reitemeier,et al.  Phase II study of camptothecin (NSC-100880) in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancer. , 1972, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[29]  A. Guarino,et al.  Preliminary pharmacologic and clinical evaluation of camptothecin sodium (NSC-100880). , 1970, Cancer chemotherapy reports.