Implementation of an outpatient electronic health record and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and office visits among patients with diabetes.

IMPORTANCE The US federal government is spending billions of dollars in physician incentives to encourage the meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs). Although the use of EHRs has potential to improve patient health outcomes, the existing evidence has been limited and inconsistent. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between implementing a commercially available outpatient EHR and emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and office visits for patients with diabetes mellitus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION Staggered EHR implementation across outpatient clinics in an integrated delivery system (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) between 2005 and 2008 created an opportunity for studying changes associated with EHR use. Among a population-based sample of 169,711 patients with diabetes between 2004 and 2009, we analyzed 4,997,585 person-months before EHR implementation and 4,648,572 person-months after an EHR was being used by patients' physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We examined the association between EHR use and unfavorable clinical events (ED visits and hospitalizations) and office visit use among patients with diabetes, using multivariable regression with patient-level fixed-effect analyses and adjustment for trends over time. RESULTS In multivariable analyses, use of the EHR was associated with a statistically significantly decreased number of ED visits, 28.80 fewer visits per 1000 patients annually (95% CI, 20.28 to 37.32), from a mean of 519.12 visits per 1000 patients annually without using the EHR to 490.32 per 1000 patients when using the EHR. The EHR was also associated with 13.10 fewer hospitalizations per 1000 patients annually (95% CI, 7.37 to 18.82), from a mean of 251.60 hospitalizations per 1000 patients annually with no EHR to 238.50 per 1000 patients annually when using the EHR. There were similar statistically significant reductions in nonelective hospitalizations (10.92 fewer per 1000 patients annually) and hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (7.08 fewer per 1000 patients annually). There was no statistically significant association between EHR use and office visit rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with diabetes, use of an outpatient EHR in an integrated delivery system was associated with modest reductions in ED visits and hospitalizations but not office visit rates. Further studies are needed to quantify the association of EHR use with changes in costs.

[1]  John Hsu,et al.  Outpatient Electronic Health Records and the Clinical Care and Outcomes of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Phil Aponte,et al.  The effectiveness of implementing an electronic health record on diabetes care and outcomes. , 2012, Health services research.

[3]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Typical Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care Practices and the Quality of Diabetes Care , 2012, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[4]  Chun-Ju Hsiao,et al.  Most physicians were eligible for federal incentives in 2011, but few had EHR systems that met meaningful-use criteria. , 2012, Health affairs.

[5]  K. Ann McKibbon,et al.  The economics of health information technology in medication management: a systematic review of economic evaluations , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Benjamin Washington,et al.  Growth in US health spending remained slow in 2010; health share of gross domestic product was unchanged from 2009. , 2012, Health affairs.

[7]  Maulik S Joshi,et al.  Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[8]  R. Cebul,et al.  Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Stafford,et al.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[11]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services.  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[12]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. , 2010, Health affairs.

[13]  Chun-Ju Hsiao,et al.  Electronic Medical Record/Electronic Health Record Systems of Office-based Physicians: United States, 2009 and Preliminary 2010 State Estimates , 2010 .

[14]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[18]  Patrick J O'Connor,et al.  Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[19]  A. Ash,et al.  Disease Burden Profiles: An Emerging Tool for Managing Managed Care , 2002, Health care management science.

[20]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[21]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[22]  N. Krieger.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. , 1992, American journal of public health.