Effect of nanoimprint on the elastic modulus of PMMA

This paper is focused on the understanding of the effect of the nanoimprint lithography process on the elastic modulus of thin, thermoplastic films. In particular, we present the comparison between the standard and an ultrafast thermal NIL technology as well as the way both processes affect the top surface of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). The PeakForce QNMź (Quantitative Nanomechanical Property Mapping) scanning probe technique was used to determine the Young's modulus of PMMA by comparison with a polystyrene standard. We demonstrate that imprinted PMMA, regardless of the used method, shows a 9-fold increase of Young's modulus compared to non-imprinted PMMA at least in the top 3-5nm thick surface layer. This important finding proves that the ultrafast process with much higher temperatures, but also with much shorter process times, leads to elastic surface properties that are comparable to those of PMMA imprinted with the standard process. We have confirmed that annealing alone does not significantly influence the Young's modulus. Display Omitted PeakForce QNM analysis of Young's modulus of imprinted PMMA by thermal and Pulsed NILPMMA undergoes 9-fold increase of Young's modulus upon imprinting.Thermal NIL and Pulsed-NIL affect similarly the mechanical properties of PMMA.

[1]  N. Bogdanski,et al.  Impact of molecular weight of polymers and shear rate effects for nanoimprint lithography , 2006 .

[2]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Novel 3D micro- and nanofabrication method using thermally activated selective topography equilibration (TASTE) of polymers , 2014, Nano Convergence.

[3]  Helmut Schift,et al.  Flow behaviour of thin polymer films used for hot embossing lithography , 2000 .

[4]  R. Simha,et al.  Free volume and viscosity of polymer-compressed gas mixtures during Extrusion foaming , 2001 .

[5]  W R Broughton,et al.  The use of the PeakForceTM quantitative nanomechanical mapping AFM-based method for high-resolution Young's modulus measurement of polymers , 2011 .

[6]  K. Yager,et al.  Nanoimprint-induced molecular orientation in semiconducting polymer nanostructures. , 2011, ACS nano.

[7]  D. Khang,et al.  Room‐Temperature Imprint Lithography , 2001 .

[8]  H. Lee,et al.  Pattern uniformity control in room-temperature imprint lithography , 2003 .

[9]  Amy Cha-Tien Sun,et al.  Impact of polymer film thickness and cavity size on polymer flow during embossing: toward process design rules for nanoimprint lithography , 2005 .

[10]  Sub-100µs nanoimprint lithography at wafer scale , 2015 .

[11]  Bumjoon J. Kim,et al.  Nanoimprinting-induced nanomorphological transition in polymer solar cells: enhanced electrical and optical performance. , 2015, ACS nano.

[12]  Ares J. Rosakis,et al.  On the Stoney Formula for a Thin Film/Substrate System With Nonuniform Substrate Thickness , 2007 .

[13]  Anders Kristensen,et al.  Fast thermal nanoimprint lithography by a stamp with integrated heater , 2008 .

[14]  Giovanni Dietler,et al.  Measurement of intrinsic properties of amyloid fibrils by the peak force QNM method. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[15]  H. Schift Nanoimprint lithography: An old story in modern times? A review , 2008 .

[16]  R E. Lyon Advanced Fire Safe Materials for Aircraft Interiors , 1997 .