Probabilistic seismic safety assessment of a CANDU 6 nuclear power plant including ambient vibration tests: Case study

Abstract Following the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in Japan there is a worldwide interest in reducing uncertainties in seismic safety assessment of existing nuclear power plant (NPP). Within the scope of a Canadian refurbishment project of a CANDU 6 (NPP) put in service in 1983, structures and equipment must sustain a new seismic demand characterised by the uniform hazard spectrum (UHS) obtained from a site specific study defined for a return period of 1/10,000 years. This UHS exhibits larger spectral ordinates in the high-frequency range than those used in design. To reduce modeling uncertainties as part of a seismic probabilistic safety assessment (PSA), Hydro-Quebec developed a procedure using ambient vibrations testing to calibrate a detailed 3D finite element model (FEM) of the containment and reactor building (RB). This calibrated FE model is then used for generating floor response spectra (FRS) based on ground motion time histories compatible with the UHS. Seismic fragility analyses of the reactor building (RB) and structural components are also performed in the context of a case study. Because the RB is founded on a large circular raft, it is possible to consider the effect of the seismic wave incoherency to filter out the high-frequency content, mainly above 10 Hz, using the incoherency transfer function (ITF) method. This allows reducing significantly the non-necessary conservatism in resulting FRS, an important issue for an existing NPP. The proposed case study, and related methodology using ambient vibration testing, is particularly useful to engineers involved in seismic re-evaluation of existing NPP.

[1]  Nam-Ho Lee,et al.  Seismic capability evaluation of the prestressed/reinforced concrete containment, Yonggwang nuclear power plant Units 5 and 6 , 1999 .

[2]  N. Null Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities , 2005 .

[3]  Sanghyun Choi,et al.  Modal parameter identification of a containment using ambient vibration measurements , 2010 .

[4]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Probability and Uncertainty in Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2005 .

[5]  R. P. Kennedy,et al.  Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant , 1980 .

[6]  L. Reiter,et al.  Procedural and submittal guidance for the individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE) for severe accident vulnerabilities , 1991 .

[7]  Pentti Varpasuo,et al.  The development of the floor response spectra using large 3D model , 1999 .

[8]  Sanghyun Choi,et al.  In-operation modal analysis of containments using ambient vibration , 2013 .

[9]  Alidad Hashemi,et al.  Probabilistic and deterministic soil structure interaction analysis including ground motion incoherency effects , 2014 .

[10]  N. Null Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures and Commentary , 2000 .

[11]  C. H. Hofmayer,et al.  Survey of seismic fragilities used in PRA studies of nuclear power plants 1 This work was performed , 1998 .

[12]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-motion Response Spectra in Eastern North America for Different Critical Damping Values , 2004 .

[13]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  The Case for Using Mean Seismic Hazard , 2005 .

[14]  In-Kil Choi,et al.  Probabilistic seismic risk analysis of CANDU containment structure for near-fault earthquakes , 2008 .

[15]  N. N. Pujari,et al.  Seismic fragility analysis of a typical Indian PHWR containment: Comparison of fragility models , 2016 .