Discriminative effect of user influence and user responsibility on information system development processes and project management

Context: User participation in information system (IS) development has received much research attention. However, prior empirical research regarding the effect of user participation on IS success is inconclusive. This might be because previous studies overlook the effect of the particular components of user participation and other possible mediating factors. Objective: The objective of this study is to empirically examine how user influence and user responsibility affect IS project performance. We inspect whether user influence and user responsibility improve the quality of the IS development process and in turn leads to project success, or if they have a direct positive influence on project success. Method: We conducted a survey of 151 IS project managers in order to understand the impact of user influence and user responsibility on IS project performance. Regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship among user influence, user responsibility, organizational technology learning, project control, user-developer interaction, and IS project management performance. Results: This study shows that user responsibility and user influence have a positive effect on project performance through the promotion of IS development processes as mediators, including organizational technology learning, project control, and user-IS interaction. Conclusion: Our results suggest that user responsibility and user influence respectively play an important role in indirectly and directly impacting project management performance. Results of the analysis imply that organizations and project managers should use both user participation and user influence to improve processes performance, and in turn, increase project success.

[1]  Gary Klein,et al.  Prototyping mediators to project performance: Learning and interaction , 2006, J. Syst. Softw..

[2]  Douglas Polley,et al.  Learning While Innovating , 1992 .

[3]  Gary Klein,et al.  Relationship of Skill Expectation Gap Between IS Employees and Their Managers with User Satisfaction , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[4]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Executive Support Systems and Learning: A Model and Empirical Test , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Sanjiv Augustine,et al.  Agile project management: steering from the edges , 2005, CACM.

[6]  Lei Li,et al.  The Influence of Checklists and Roles on Software Practitioner Risk Perception and Decision-Making , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[7]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[8]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[9]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[10]  Mark Keil,et al.  The user–developer communication process: a critical case study , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Sponsorship and IT vendor management of projects , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Gary Klein,et al.  The Effects of User Partnering and User Non-Support on Project Performance , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Technology-Process Fit: Perspectives on Achieving Prototyping Effectiveness , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Mark A. Harris,et al.  A New Look at the Relationship between User Involvement in Systems Development and System Success , 2009, Communications of the Association for Information Systems.

[15]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[16]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[17]  D. Hartfiel,et al.  Understanding , 2003 .

[18]  Gary Klein,et al.  Lack of Skill Risks to Organizational Technology Learning and Software Project Performance , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[19]  C. R. Franz,et al.  Group process and conflict in system development , 1989 .

[20]  Tony Gorschek,et al.  A controlled empirical evaluation of a requirements abstraction model , 2007, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[21]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  Organizational Learning during Advanced System Development: Opportunities and Obstacles , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[23]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors , 1994, MIS Q..

[24]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[25]  Gary Klein,et al.  The relative influence of management control and user-IS personnel interaction on project performance , 2006, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[26]  Gary Klein,et al.  User and developer common knowledge: Effect on the success of information system development projects , 2009 .

[27]  Sue Newell,et al.  Exploring the Importance of Participation in the Post-Implementation Period of an ES Project: A Neglected Area , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Petri Hallikainen,et al.  User Influence in E-Service Evolution: A Case Study of E-Banking , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Qing Chang,et al.  How Low Should You Go? Low Response Rates and the Validity of Inference in IS Questionnaire Research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Sarma R. Nidumolu.  The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Pradip M. Mehta.  Effective Implementation of a Project Control System , 2008 .

[32]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Gad Vitner,et al.  Project Control: Literature Review , 2006 .

[34]  Deborah J. Armstrong,et al.  AMCIS 2008 Panel Summary: Managing Student Projects - Learning from the Past , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Sarma R. Nidumolu.  A Comparison of the Structural Contingency and Risk-Based Perspectives on Coordination in Software Development Projects , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  F. W. McFarlan,et al.  Portfolio approach to information systems , 1989 .

[37]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[38]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[39]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[41]  Gary F. Templeton,et al.  Development of a Measure for the Organizational Learning Construct , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[43]  Robert M. Hayes,et al.  Systems analysis and design , 1970, ACM '70.

[44]  Sergey M. Avdoshin,et al.  Software risk management , 2011, 2011 7th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR).

[45]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Managing Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning , 2005, MIS Q..

[46]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[47]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Total Quality Management in Information Systems Development: Key Constructs and Relationships , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[51]  FarajSamer,et al.  Why should i share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice , 2005 .

[52]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[53]  Charles R. Emery.  A cause-effect-cause model for sustaining cross-functional integration , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[54]  James J. Jiang,et al.  The effects of change control and management review on software flexibility and project performance , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[55]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The enactments and consequences of token, shared, and compliant participation in information systems development , 1996 .

[56]  Salah Eldin Adam Hamza,et al.  Monitoring and controlling design process using control charts and process sigma , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[57]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[58]  Dane K. Peterson,et al.  Perceptions on IS Risks and Failure Types: A Comparison of Designers from the United States, Japan and Korea , 2003, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[59]  Gary Klein,et al.  Software development risks to project effectiveness , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..