How Decentral Smart Grid Control Limits Non-Gaussian Power Grid Frequency Fluctuations

Frequency fluctuations in power grids, caused by unpredictable renewable energy sources, consumer behavior and trading, need to be balanced to ensure stable grid operation. Standard smart grid solutions to mitigate large frequency excursions are based on centrally collecting data and give rise to security and privacy concerns. Furthermore, control of fluctuations is often tested by employing Gaussian perturbations. Here, we demonstrate that power grid frequency fluctuations are in general non-Gaussian, implying that large excursions are more likely than expected based on Gaussian modeling. We consider real power grid frequency measurements from Continental Europe and compare them to stochastic models and predictions based on Fokker-Planck equations. Furthermore, we review a decentral smart grid control scheme to limit these fluctuations. In particular, we derive a scaling law of how decentralized control actions reduce the magnitude of frequency fluctuations and demonstrate the power of these theoretical predictions using a test grid. Overall, we find that decentral smart grid control may reduce grid frequency excursions due to both Gaussian and non-Gaussian power fluctuations and thus offers an alternative pathway for mitigating fluctuation-induced risks.

[1]  François Bouffard,et al.  Decentralized Demand-Side Contribution to Primary Frequency Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  B.F. Wollenberg,et al.  Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century , 2005, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[3]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  A summary of demand response in electricity markets , 2008 .

[4]  P. Sorensen,et al.  Power Fluctuations From Large Wind Farms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  J. Kurths,et al.  Taming instabilities in power grid networks by decentralized control , 2015, 1508.02217.

[6]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[7]  Palle Andersen,et al.  Aggregation and Control of Flexible Consumers: A Real Life Demonstration , 2014 .

[8]  Xi Fang,et al.  3. Full Four-channel 6.3-gb/s 60-ghz Cmos Transceiver with Low-power Analog and Digital Baseband Circuitry 7. Smart Grid — the New and Improved Power Grid: a Survey , 2022 .

[9]  J. Peinke,et al.  Turbulent character of wind energy. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[10]  G. Filatrella,et al.  Analysis of a power grid using a Kuramoto-like model , 2007, 0705.1305.

[11]  N. D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Frequency Control in Autonomous Power Systems With High Wind Power Penetration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[12]  Dirk Witthaut,et al.  Non-Gaussian power grid frequency fluctuations characterized by Lévy-stable laws and superstatistics , 2018, Nature Energy.

[13]  J. Klafter,et al.  The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach , 2000 .

[14]  B. Francois,et al.  Dynamic Frequency Control Support by Energy Storage to Reduce the Impact of Wind and Solar Generation on Isolated Power System's Inertia , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[15]  Gerhard Bohm,et al.  Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis for Physicists , 2017 .

[16]  A. Oudalov,et al.  Optimizing a Battery Energy Storage System for Frequency Control Application in an Isolated Power System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Vito Latora,et al.  Control of active power for synchronization and transient stability of power grids , 2018, ArXiv.

[18]  Herwig Renner,et al.  Dynamic simulation of a 110-kV-network during grid restoration and in islanded operation , 2009 .

[19]  Marc Timme,et al.  Decentral Smart Grid Control , 2015 .

[20]  João P. S. Catalão,et al.  A Decentralized Electricity Market Scheme Enabling Demand Response Deployment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Jin Lin,et al.  Review on frequency control of power systems with wind power penetration , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology.

[22]  Amin Kargarian,et al.  Diagonal Quadratic Approximation for Decentralized Collaborative TSO+DSO Optimal Power Flow , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[23]  D.G. Infield,et al.  Stabilization of Grid Frequency Through Dynamic Demand Control , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  S. Sharma,et al.  The Fokker-Planck Equation , 2010 .

[25]  S. I. Denisov,et al.  Generalized Fokker-Planck equation: Derivation and exact solutions , 2008, 0808.0274.

[26]  M. Taqqu,et al.  Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes : Stochastic Models with Infinite Variance , 1995 .

[27]  Frede Blaabjerg,et al.  Overview of Control and Grid Synchronization for Distributed Power Generation Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[28]  N. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Making microgrids work , 2008, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[29]  Dong Hui,et al.  Battery Energy Storage Station (BESS)-Based Smoothing Control of Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind Power Generation Fluctuations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[30]  M M A Salama,et al.  Investigation of Methods for Reduction of Power Fluctuations Generated From Large Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[31]  Jan T. Bialasiewicz,et al.  Power-Electronic Systems for the Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Sources: A Survey , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[32]  Peter Palensky,et al.  Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[33]  K. Burges,et al.  Overview of German Grid Issues and Retrofit of Photovoltaic Power Plants in Germany for the Prevention of Frequency Stability Problems in Abnormal System Conditions of the ENTSO-E Region Continental Europe , 2012 .