An exploratory study of public reports to investigate patterns and themes of requests for sexual images of minors online

There is a growing body of research on sexually motivated online communication with minors that has been variously described as luring, grooming and solicitation. Evidence from US studies would suggest an increase in aggressive sexual solicitations, with adolescent girls being more likely to be targeted. Existing research has involved adolescent as well as offender populations, and has largely relied on surveys with young people, interviews and official record data with offenders and ethnographic work with police officers. There have also been a number of studies using chat log data between offenders and adults pretending to be children. In addition, while the use of sexual images has been noted in both offender and victim studies, this has not been critically examined. The present study is different as it used reports from the public to Cybertip.ca to make sense of the types of behaviour that alerted concerned adults, and occasionally young people, to make a report; information available about the young person; information about the suspect, and the interaction between the two. The results of this study show strong similarities with previous research in relation to both offender and victim populations. Implications are discussed in relation to the importance of reporting mechanisms, awareness raising with parents and the need to recognize sexual agency and resilience in many adolescents.

[1]  Carl Göran Svedin,et al.  Online or off-line victimisation and psychological well-being: a comparison of sexual-minority and heterosexual youth , 2012, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[2]  Niklas Långström.  The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Exhibitionism, Voyeurism, and Frotteurism , 2010, Archives of sexual behavior.

[3]  E. Gilchrist,et al.  Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations , 2006 .

[4]  Ponnurangam Kumaraguru,et al.  Characterizing Pedophile Conversations on the Internet using Online Grooming , 2012, ArXiv.

[5]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  A linguistic analysis of grooming strategies of online child sex offenders: Implications for our understanding of predatory sexual behavior in an increasingly computer-mediated world. , 2015, Child abuse & neglect.

[6]  S. Billick,et al.  Forensic Implications: Adolescent Sexting and Cyberbullying , 2014, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[7]  K. Mitchell,et al.  Trends in Unwanted Sexual Solicitations: Findings from the Youth Internet Safety Studies , 2014 .

[8]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  Final report , 2000 .

[9]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[10]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  The meaning of online problematic situations for children: results of qualitative cross-cultural investigation in nine European countries , 2014 .

[11]  Susanne E. Baumgartner,et al.  Unwanted Online Sexual Solicitation and Risky Sexual Online Behavior across the Lifespan , 2010 .

[12]  Anthony R. Beech,et al.  A review of young people's vulnerabilities to online grooming , 2013 .

[13]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  Strategic and Nonstrategic Information Acquisition , 2002 .

[14]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. , 2014, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[15]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries , 2011 .

[16]  Anthony R. Beech,et al.  Identifying Sexual Grooming Themes Used by Internet Sex Offenders , 2013 .

[17]  E. Quayle,et al.  The Role of Sexual Images in Online and Offline Sexual Behaviour With Minors , 2015, Current Psychiatry Reports.

[18]  Michel Walrave,et al.  The Associations Between Adolescents' Consumption of Pornography and Music Videos and Their Sexting Behavior , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  A. Beech,et al.  A Comparison of Victim and Offender Perspectives of Grooming and Sexual Abuse , 2015 .

[20]  Rachel O’Connell Cyberspace.  A TYPOLOGY OF CHILD CYBERSEXPLOITATION AND ONLINE GROOMING PRACTICES , 2003 .

[21]  C. Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[22]  M. First.  DSM-5 and paraphilic disorders. , 2014, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[23]  Alisdair A. Gillespie,et al.  Adolescents, Sexting and Human Rights , 2013 .

[24]  R. O'Connell,et al.  A typology of cybersexploitation and online grooming practices , 2003 .

[25]  David Finkelhor,et al.  Trends in youth internet victimization: findings from three youth internet safety surveys 2000-2010. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[26]  Peter M. Briggs,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Internet-Initiated Sexual Offenses and the Chat Room Sex Offender: Has the Internet Enabled a New Typology of Sex Offender? , 2011, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[27]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[28]  M. Seto,et al.  Online solicitation offenders are different from child pornography offenders and lower risk contact sexual offenders. , 2012, Law and Human Behavior.

[29]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Online "predators" and their victims: myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[30]  Hannah Lena Merdian,et al.  The three dimensions of online child pornography offending , 2013 .

[31]  A. Beech,et al.  Understanding online child pornography use: Applying sexual offense theory to internet offenders , 2009 .

[32]  L. Olson,et al.  Entrapping the Innocent: Toward a Theory of Child Sexual Predators’ Luring Communication , 2007 .

[33]  Susanne E. Baumgartner,et al.  Developmental trajectories of peer victimization: off-line and online experiences during adolescence. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[34]  S. Livingstone,et al.  UK children go online: surveying the experiences of young people and their parents , 2004 .

[35]  Ethel Quayle,et al.  Rapid skill acquisition and online sexual grooming of children , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Janis Wolak,et al.  Understanding the decline in unwanted online sexual solicitations for U.S. youth 2000-2010: findings from three Youth Internet Safety Surveys. , 2013, Child abuse & neglect.

[37]  Online interactions involving suspected paedophiles who engage male children , 2010 .

[38]  L. Haddon,et al.  Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: key findings from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries , 2010 .

[39]  Eric Rice,et al.  Cell Phone Internet Access, Online Sexual Solicitation, Partner Seeking, and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Adolescents , 2014, Archives of Sexual Behavior.