Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making

Abstract This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.

[1]  M. Brunson The Elusive Promise of Social-Ecological Approaches to Rangeland Management , 2012 .

[2]  R. McALLISTER Livestock mobility in arid and semiarid Australia: escaping variability in space , 2012 .

[3]  D. Briske Translational Science Partnerships: Key to Environmental Stewardship , 2012 .

[4]  U. Kreuter,et al.  To Burn or Not to Burn: Ecological Restoration, Liability Concerns, and the Role of Prescribed Burning Associations , 2012 .

[5]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Examining the direct and indirect effects of environmental change and place attachment on land management decisions in the Hill Country of Texas, USA , 2012 .

[6]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Centrality of the Ranching Lifestyle and Attitudes Toward a Voluntary Incentive Program to Protect Endangered Species , 2012 .

[7]  Matthew Hoffman,et al.  Innovation, Cooperation, and the Perceived Benefits and Costs of Sustainable Agriculture Practices , 2011 .

[8]  M. Kelly,et al.  Forest and rangeland owners value land for natural amenities and as financial investment , 2011 .

[9]  C. Ohmart,et al.  The Evolution of Local Partnerships for Sustainable Agriculture , 2011 .

[10]  W. Haider,et al.  Incentive Structure of and Private Landowner Participation in an Endangered Species Conservation Program , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[12]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Participatory Scenario Planning for Protected Areas Management under the Ecosystem Services Framework: the Doñana Social-Ecological System in Southwestern Spain , 2011 .

[13]  N. Sayre,et al.  Conservation Outcomes and Social Relations: A Comparative Study of Private Ranchland Conservation Easements , 2010 .

[14]  L. Huntsinger,et al.  Hardwood Rangeland Landowners in California from 1985 to 2004: Production, Ecosystem Services, and Permanence , 2010 .

[15]  Corrine Noel Knapp,et al.  Understanding Change: Integrating Rancher Knowledge Into State-and-Transition Models , 2009 .

[16]  Daniel W. Mccollum,et al.  An Integrated Social, Economic, and Ecologic Conceptual (ISEEC) Framework for Considering Rangeland Sustainability , 2009 .

[17]  Ryan R. J. McAllister,et al.  Patterns of accessing variable resources across time and space : Desert plants, animals and people , 2009 .

[18]  Charles Francis,et al.  Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? , 2008, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[19]  L. Prokopy,et al.  Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[20]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Perceptions of Texas Landowners Regarding Fire and Its Use , 2008 .

[21]  M. Smith,et al.  Managing arid zone natural resources in Australia for spatial and temporal variability – an approach from first principles , 2008 .

[22]  M. Brunson,et al.  Highlights, Rangeland Ecology & Management, March 2008 , 2008 .

[23]  John B. Wright,et al.  Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States , 2007 .

[24]  M. Lubell,et al.  Local Policy Networks and Agricultural Watershed Management , 2007 .

[25]  T. Valente,et al.  Identifying Opinion Leaders to Promote Behavior Change , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[26]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[27]  L. Gillson,et al.  Rangeland Ecology in a Changing World , 2007, Science.

[28]  Ryan R. J. McAllister,et al.  Australian pastoralists in time and space: the evolution of a complex adaptive system , 2006 .

[29]  Janis E. Johnston,et al.  Property Rights Orientations and Rangeland Management Objectives: Texas, Utah, and Colorado , 2006 .

[30]  Yiheyis Maru,et al.  Australian rangelands as complex adaptive systems: A conceptual model and preliminary results , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  E. Stanley,et al.  Process-Based Ecological River Restoration: Visualizing Three-Dimensional Connectivity and Dynamic Vectors to Recover Lost Linkages , 2006 .

[32]  P. Horwitz,et al.  A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[33]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Uncertainty and Sustainability in the Management of Rangelands , 2006 .

[34]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[35]  D. Jackson‐Smith,et al.  Understanding the Multidimensionality of Property Rights Orientations: Evidence from Utah and Texas Ranchers , 2005 .

[36]  Roger Wilkinson,et al.  Beyond Participation: Boundary Organizations as a New Space for Farmers and Scientists to Interact , 2005 .

[37]  M. Brunson,et al.  Adoption of range management innovations by Utah ranchers , 2004 .

[38]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Landowner willingness to participate in a Texas brush reduction program , 2004 .

[39]  G. Guthey,et al.  Land Trusts and Conservation Easements: Who Is Conserving What for Whom? , 2004 .

[40]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[41]  D. Guston Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[42]  Keith O. Fuglie,et al.  Adoption and Diffusion of Natural-Resource-Conserving Agricultural Technology , 2001 .

[43]  D. Coppock,et al.  Economics and Demographics Constrain Investment in Utah Private Grazing Lands , 2001 .

[44]  T. L. Napier,et al.  Adoption of conservation production systems in three Midwest watersheds , 2000 .

[45]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[46]  L. Huntsinger,et al.  Viewpoint: Sustaining rangeland landscapes: a social and ecological process , 1996 .

[47]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[48]  Jon Hurwitz,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint , 1985 .

[49]  F. Buttel,et al.  The rural sociology of the advanced societies: critical perspectives. , 1982 .

[50]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[51]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  The interplay between psychometric and sociometric data and the willingness to adopt innovations , 2011 .

[52]  Általános társadalom tudományok,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 2011 .

[53]  A. Mishra,et al.  Factors Affecting Succession Decisions in Family Farm Businesses: Evidence from a National Survey , 2007 .

[54]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[55]  T. Thurow,et al.  Policy prospects for brush control to increase off-site water yield. , 2000 .

[56]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[57]  D. Coppock,et al.  Use of Livestock and Range Management Practices in Utah , 1999 .

[58]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Thought , 1979 .

[59]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Adaptive Decision-Maker : Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 2022 .