The feedback-related negativity reflects “more or less” prediction error in appetitive and aversive conditions

Humans make predictions and use feedback to update their subsequent predictions. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) has been found to be sensitive to negative feedback as well as negative prediction error, such that the FRN is larger for outcomes that are worse than expected. The present study examined prediction errors in both appetitive and aversive conditions. We found that the FRN was more negative for reward omission vs. wins and for loss omission vs. losses, suggesting that the FRN might classify outcomes in a “more-or-less than expected” fashion rather than in the “better-or-worse than expected” dimension. Our findings challenge the previous notion that the FRN only encodes negative feedback and “worse than expected” negative prediction error.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Modulation of the feedback-related negativity by instruction and experience , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  The good, the bad and the neutral: Electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli , 2006, Brain Research.

[3]  Luo Jia,et al.  A new method for off-line recognition of English letters based on concave-and-convex feature , 2008 .

[4]  Guillem R. Esber,et al.  Reconciling the influence of predictiveness and uncertainty on stimulus salience: a model of attention in associative learning , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  P. Dayan,et al.  Differential Encoding of Losses and Gains in the Human Striatum , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[7]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[11]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[12]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  Mentalizing in economic decision-making , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  Uta Sailer,et al.  Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[17]  Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin,et al.  Dopamine in Motivational Control: Rewarding, Aversive, and Alerting , 2010, Neuron.

[18]  John M. Pearson,et al.  Surprise Signals in Anterior Cingulate Cortex: Neuronal Encoding of Unsigned Reward Prediction Errors Driving Adjustment in Behavior , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Guillem R. Esber,et al.  All that glitters ... dissociating attention and outcome expectancy from prediction errors signals. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Errors in reward prediction are re£ected in the event-related brain potential , 2003 .

[21]  Roshan Cools,et al.  Feedback-related Negativity Codes Prediction Error but Not Behavioral Adjustment during Probabilistic Reversal Learning , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  David Goodman,et al.  Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Rongjun Yu,et al.  Brain potentials associated with outcome expectation and outcome evaluation , 2006, Neuroreport.

[24]  Deborah Talmi,et al.  The Feedback-Related Negativity Signals Salience Prediction Errors, Not Reward Prediction Errors , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[26]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Tobias U. Hauser,et al.  The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: New insights into the localization, meaning and network organization , 2014, NeuroImage.

[28]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[29]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Two types of dopamine neuron distinctly convey positive and negative motivational signals , 2009, Nature.

[30]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra , 2007, NeuroImage.

[31]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[32]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Single-Trial Analyses: Why Bother? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[33]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance , 2004, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.