Evolution of Body Size: Consequences of an Energetic Definition of Fitness

We develop a general model for the effect of body size on fitness. We define fitness as reproductive power, the rate of conversion of energy into offspring. Reproductive power is assumed to be limited by a two-step process: first, the rate of acquisition of energy from the environment, which scales allometrically as body mass raised to approximately the 0.75 power, and then the rate of conversion of energy into offspring, which scales as mass to approximately the -0.25 power. The model predicts (1) the distinctive right-skewed shape of the frequency distribution of logarithms of body sizes among species that is observed in a wide variety of organisms from bacteria to mammals; (2) a taxon-specific optimal body size, which for mammals is approximately 100 g and is supported by data on the body sizes of mammals on islands; and (3) that in each taxon the relationships between such life-history and ecological characteristics as longevity, clutch size, home range size, and population density will change both slope and sign on either side of the optimal size. An energetic definition of fitness has the potential to unify areas of ecology and evolutionary biology that have previously used models based on different currencies.

[1]  James H. Brown,et al.  THE MICRO AND MACRO IN BODY SIZE EVOLUTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[3]  M. Taper,et al.  MODELS OF CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AND THE THEORETICAL ROBUSTNESS OF TAXON CYCLES , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  F. Smith,et al.  A Model of Dietary Fiber Utilization by Small Mammalian Herbivores, with Empirical Results for Neotoma , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior , 1992 .

[6]  E. Charnov,et al.  Evolution of life history variation among female mammals. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[8]  J. Castilla,et al.  Scaling Population Density to Body Size in Rocky Intertidal Communities , 1990, Science.

[9]  James H. Brown,et al.  Comparative Population Ecology of Eleven Species of Rodents in the Chihuahuan Desert , 1989 .

[10]  Michael J. Reiss,et al.  The allometry of growth and reproduction , 1989 .

[11]  K. Dial,et al.  Are the Smallest Organisms the Most Diverse , 1988 .

[12]  W. Calder.  Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[13]  J. Bonner.  The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection , 1988 .

[14]  James H. Brown,et al.  Evolution of Species Assemblages: Effects of Energetic Constraints and Species Dynamics on the Diversification of the North American Avifauna , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Robert M. May,et al.  The Search for Patterns in the Balance of Nature: Advances and Retreats , 1986 .

[16]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  A THEORY OF FAUNAL BUILDUP FOR COMPETITION COMMUNITIES , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Montague W. Demment,et al.  A Nutritional Explanation for Body-Size Patterns of Ruminant and Nonruminant Herbivores , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[18]  J. Lawton,et al.  Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths , 1985, Nature.

[19]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Body Size of Mammals on Islands: The Island Rule Reexamined , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[20]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[21]  J. Kozłowski,et al.  Evolution of Body Size: An Optimization Model , 1983 .

[22]  D. Roff.  On Being the Right Size , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[23]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[24]  T. Case.  Optimal body size and an animal's diet , 1979, Acta biotheoretica.

[25]  J. Gillespie.  Natural Selection for Variances in Offspring Numbers: A New Evolutionary Principle , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[26]  S. Stearns.  Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[27]  M. Slatkin.  Hedging one's evolutionary bets , 1974, Nature.

[28]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Selection for Optimal Life Histories: The Effects of Age Structure , 1974 .

[29]  S. Stanley,et al.  AN EXPLANATION FOR COPE'S RULE , 1973, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  J. Haddon.  ENVIRONMENT, POWER, AND SOCIETY , 1971 .

[31]  William H. Bossert,et al.  Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[32]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  A Theoretical Ecological Model of Size Distributions Among Species of Animals , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[33]  E. Schrödinger.  What is life? : the physical aspect of the living cell , 1944 .

[34]  J. B. Mcnair.  Energy and evolution , 1941 .

[35]  A. J. Lotka.  Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. , 1922, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.