Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions

AbstractObjectivesAssessment of contrast agent kinetics in contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) with gadolinium-containing contrast agents offers the opportunity to predict breast lesion malignancy. The goal of our study was to determine if similar patterns exist for spectral contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT) using an iodinated contrast agent.MethodsThe protocol of our prospective study was approved by the relevant institutional review board and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection. All patients provided written informed consent. We included 21 women with a mean age of 62.4 years. All underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy of a suspect breast lesion, spectral CE-DBT and CE-MRI. For every breast lesion, contrast agent kinetics was assessed by signal intensity–time curves for spectral CE-DBT and CE-MRI. Statistical comparison used Cohen’s kappa and Spearman’s rho test.ResultsSpearman’s rho of 0.49 showed significant (P = 0.036) correlation regarding the contrast agent kinetics in signal intensity–time curves for spectral CE-DBT and CE-MRI. Cohen’s kappa indicated moderate agreement (kappa = 0.438).ConclusionThere is a statistically significant correlation between contrast agent kinetics in the signal intensity–time curves for spectral CE-DBT and CE-MRI. Observing intralesional contrast agent kinetics in spectral CE-DBT may aid evaluation of malignant breast lesions.Key Points• Contrast agent kinetics can be assessed using spectral digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). • Contrast agent kinetics patterns in spectral DBT are similar to those in contrast-enhanced MRI. • Multiple contrast enhancement for spectral DBT gives additional diagnostic information.

[1]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  Jürgen Gieseke,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. , 2006, Radiology.

[4]  Gregor Jost,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Contrast Media in Humans: Model With Circulation, Distribution, and Renal Excretion , 2011 .

[5]  U. Bick,et al.  Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  Loren Niklason,et al.  Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2007, Seminars in roentgenology.

[7]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[8]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Optimal post‐contrast timing of breast MR image acquisition for architectural feature analysis , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Serge Muller,et al.  Digital Mammography Using Iodine-Based Contrast Media: Initial Clinical Experience With Dynamic Contrast Medium Enhancement , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Jong Hyo Kim,et al.  Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[11]  N M Hylton,et al.  Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis--a feasibility study. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Yoji Urata,et al.  Dynamic helical CT mammography of breast cancer , 2006, Radiation Medicine.

[14]  Serge Muller,et al.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  W. Kaiser,et al.  An Exception to Tumour Neoangiogenesis in a Malignant Breast‐Lesion , 2010, The breast journal.

[17]  Corinne Balleyguier,et al.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Erik Fredenberg,et al.  Energy resolution of a photon-counting silicon strip detector , 2010, 2101.07789.

[19]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  John M Boone,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[22]  K. Hellerhoff,et al.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis : technical principles, current clinical relevance and future perspectives]. , 2010, Der Radiologe.

[23]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[24]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.