Measurement validity in physical therapy research.

This article considers the role of measurement validity within physical therapy research. The concept of measurement validity is identified as a component of internal validity, and it is differentiated from the notion of reliability; these concepts are related to systematic and random sources of error, respectively. Using examples from physical therapy and rehabilitation, four main types of validity are reviewed: face validity, criterion-related validity, content validity, and construct validity. The differing implications of these types of validity for quantitative and qualitative research are discussed. Three principal areas of concern are then addressed, based on a critical discussion of selected examples from the literature. First, it is argued that validity is often poorly distinguished from the allied concept of reliability and that purported claims for validity often only demonstrate reliability. Second, it is claimed that validity is too often neglected in favor of reliability, and specific examples relating to gait analysis are put forward to support this argument. Third, some of the methodological difficulties that may occur when attempts are made to demonstrate validity are considered. The article concludes with a plea for a closer focus on the issue of measurement validity within physical therapy research.

[1]  P. Hinds,et al.  Further assessment of a method to estimate reliability and validity of qualitative research findings. , 1990, Journal of advanced nursing.

[2]  V. Pomeroy.  Development of an ADL Oriented Assessment-of-Mobility Scale Suitable for Use with Elderly People with Dementia , 1990 .

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  N. Chappell.  Measuring functional ability and chronic health conditions among the elderly: a research note on the adequacy of three instruments. , 1981, Journal of health and social behavior.

[6]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[7]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research , 1982 .

[8]  Arnell Mm.  Numerical descriptors of the intersegmental kinematics of gait. , 1988 .

[9]  H. de Bruin,et al.  Angle-angle diagrams in monitoring and quantification of gait patterns for children with cerebral palsy. , 1982, American journal of physical medicine.

[10]  D. Silverman.  Qualitative Methodology and Sociology: Describing the Social World , 1985 .

[11]  M. Seeman.  On The Meaning of Alienation , 1959 .

[12]  T. A. Gore.  The kinematics of normal and pathological hip joints. , 1980 .

[13]  D E Krebs,et al.  Reliability of observational kinematic gait analysis. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[14]  Fn Kerlinger,et al.  Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed. , 1973 .

[15]  L. Diller,et al.  Reliability among physical therapists in diagnosis and treatment of gait deviations in hemiplegics. , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[17]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[18]  D. Riddle,et al.  Validity of derived measurements of leg-length differences obtained by use of a tape measure. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[19]  G. Smidt,et al.  Measurement of hip-joint motion during walking. Evaluation of an electrogoniometric method. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.