Research Commentary - Diversity of the Information Systems Research Field: A Journal Governance Perspective

Diversity has attracted much attention within the information systems (IS) field, with literature concentrating on diversity in topics and methods. These constitute two of three identified areas of research field diversity; the little-investigated third area includes demographic and social diversity of researchers. This study explores this gap for researchers comprising the editorial advisory boards (EABs) of 52 IS journals and links the underexplored types of diversity to topic diversity. The journals are categorized into seven intellectual communities, using topic affinity of journal content, and a social network of EAB members constructed from board interlocks. The network structure appears to reflect the topic-based community links. Journal communities are aggregated into two components of the social network: a business-school-related core set of journals and a more diverse computing- and engineering-related periphery. The strong ties at the network center do not necessarily reflect journal status. The observed combination of focus and diversity is consistent with a polycentric view of the IS field. Findings suggest low demographic diversity in the field and that demographic diversity correlates with other types of diversity. The field’s separation into business core and computing periphery is highlighted as potentially challenging to the IS field’s identity.

[1]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  The teaching of qualitative research methods in information systems: an explorative study utilizing learning theory , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[3]  Guillaume Cabanac,et al.  Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  David E. Avison,et al.  Is theory king?: questioning the theory fetish in information systems , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[8]  Kathleen Dechant,et al.  Building a business case for diversity , 1997 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[10]  Peter Scott,et al.  International human resource management , 2013 .

[11]  Tibor Braun,et al.  World Flash on Basic Research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[12]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[13]  C. Chow,et al.  Are Articles in “Top” Management Journals Necessarily of Higher Quality? , 2007 .

[14]  Dirk S. Hovorka,et al.  Analyzing unstructured text data: Using latent categorization to identify intellectual communities in information systems , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  David E. Avison,et al.  Information systems practice, education and research , 1991, Inf. Syst. J..

[16]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems : the state of the field , 2006 .

[17]  Thomas A. Lee.  Shaping the US Academic Accounting Research Profession: The American Accounting Association and the Social Construction of a Professional Elite , 1995 .

[18]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Dwight A. Haworth,et al.  Determining Underlying Corporate Viewpoints on Information Systems Education Curricula , 1994 .

[20]  Blaise Cronin.  A seat at the table , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  E. Swanson,et al.  Publishing in the Majors: A Comparison of Accounting, Finance, Management, and Marketing , 2002 .

[23]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[24]  Blaise Cronin Editor-in-Chief.  A seat at the table , 2009 .

[25]  Maurice Landry,et al.  A disciplined methodological pluralism for mis research , 1992 .

[26]  William Yurcik,et al.  Different Approaches in the Teaching of Information Systems Security , 2001 .

[27]  Isabel Metz,et al.  Explaining geographic diversity of editorial boards: the role of conference participation and English-language skills , 2012 .

[28]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for information systems scholars: III , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[31]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring Researcher-Production in Information Systems , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Isabel Metz,et al.  Gender Diversity in Editorial Boards of Management Journals , 2009 .

[35]  M. K. Raja,et al.  Computing journals and their emerging roles in knowledge exchange , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[36]  Lucio Barabesi,et al.  Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals , 2008, Scientometrics.

[37]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The implications of a critical agenda in gender and IS research , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[38]  Stuart Dillon,et al.  Focus and Diversity in Information Systems Research: Meeting the Dual Demands of a Healthy Applied Discipline , 2010, MIS Q..

[39]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Using Social Network Analysis to Analyze Relationships Among IS Journals , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  Bridging Domains in Workplace Demography Research: A Review and Reconceptualization , 2011 .

[41]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Information Systems Development Research: An Exploration of Ideas in Practice , 1991, Comput. J..

[42]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  Maureen Meadows,et al.  A Discipline Divided: Globalization and Parochialism in Information Systems Research , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Lucio Barabesi,et al.  Seats at the table: the network of the editorial boards in information and library science , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[45]  Y. Altman,et al.  Leadership in the Academic Field of Business and Management and the Question of Country of Origin: A Commentary on Burgess and Shaw (2010) , 2012 .

[46]  C. Cabral-Cardoso,et al.  Managing diversity in academic organizations: a challenge to organizational culture , 2007 .

[47]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[48]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  Scientific Achievement and Editorial Board Membership , 2009 .

[49]  Isabel Metz,et al.  The Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards , 2013 .

[50]  W. Bennis,et al.  How business schools lost their way. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[51]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Daniel C. Feldman,et al.  Building and Maintaining a Strong Editorial Board and Cadre of Ad Hoc Reviewers , 2008 .

[53]  T. Burgess,et al.  Editorial Board Membership of Management and Business Journals: A Social Network Analysis Study of the Financial Times 40 , 2010 .