Evolution of a Species' Range

Gene flow from the center of a species' range can stymie adaptation at the periphery and prevent the range from expanding outward. We study this process using simple models that track both demography and the evolution of a quantitative trait in a population that is continuously distributed in space. Stabilizing selection acts on the trait and favors an optimum phenotype that changes linearly across the habitat. One of three outcomes is possible: the species will become extinct, expand to fill all of the available habitat, or be confined to a limited range in which it is sufficiently adapted to allow population growth. When the environment changes rapidly in space, increased migration inhibits local adaptation and so decreases the species' total population size. Gene flow can cause enough maladaptation that the peripheral half of a species' range acts as a demographic sink. The trait's genetic variance has little effect on species persistence or the size of the range when gene flow is sufficiently strong to keep population densities far below the carrying capacity throughout the range, but it can increase the range width and population size of an abundant species. Under some conditions, a small parameter change can dramatically shift the balance between gene flow and local adaptation, allowing a species with a limited range to suddenly expand to fill all the available habitat.

[1]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  How Does Immigration Influence Local Adaptation? A Reexamination of a Familiar Paradigm , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. Krakauer,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION, SPACE, AND SPECIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The Evolution of Metapopulations , 1997 .

[4]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Size, Shape, Boundaries, and Internal Structure , 1996 .

[5]  P. C. Dias,et al.  Sources and sinks in population biology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  K. Gaston,et al.  Species-range-size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  WHEN DOES EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION PREVENT EXTINCTION? , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  N. Barton,et al.  Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal? , 1994, Genetics.

[9]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  B. Grant,et al.  PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC EFFECTS OF HYBRIDIZATION IN DARWIN'S FINCHES , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  The Evolution of Behavioral Phenotypes: Lessons Learned from Divergent Spider Populations , 1993 .

[12]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress , 1991 .

[13]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Nonadaptive clutch sizes in tits , 1990, Nature.

[14]  R. Lande,et al.  A Model of Population Growth, Dispersal and Evolution in a Changing Environment , 1989 .

[15]  N. Barton,et al.  Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? , 1989, Annual review of genetics.

[16]  Derek A Roff,et al.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components , 1987, Heredity.

[17]  J. Endler Natural selection in the wild , 1987 .

[18]  N. Barton The effects of linkage and density-dependent regulation on gene flow , 1986, Heredity.

[19]  M. Turelli Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. , 1984, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  Stephen C Stearns,et al.  MALADAPTATION IN A MARGINAL POPULATION OF THE MOSQUITO FISH, GAMBUSIA AFFINIS , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  明 大久保,et al.  Diffusion and ecological problems : mathematical models , 1980 .

[22]  J. Antonovics,et al.  Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations , 1978, Heredity.

[23]  M Slatkin,et al.  Spatial patterns in the distributions of polygenic characters. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  J. Endler Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. , 1977, Monographs in population biology.

[25]  J. Antonovics THE NATURE OF LIMITS TO NATURAL SELECTION , 1976 .

[26]  R M Nisbet,et al.  The regulation of inhomogeneous populations. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Conditions for the existence of clines. , 1975, Genetics.

[28]  M. Slatkin Gene flow and selection in a cline. , 1973, Genetics.

[29]  T. McNeilly Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations III. Agrostis tenuis on a small copper mine , 1968, Heredity.

[30]  G. A. Horridge,et al.  Animal species and evolution. , 1964 .

[31]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Natural Selection in Water Snakes (Natrix sipedon L.) on Islands in Lake Erie , 1958 .

[32]  J. G. Skellam Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.

[33]  R. Fisher THE WAVE OF ADVANCE OF ADVANTAGEOUS GENES , 1937 .