Angular Reflectance of Leaves With a Dual-Wavelength Terrestrial Lidar and Its Implications for Leaf-Bark Separation and Leaf Moisture Estimation

A new generation of multiwavelength lidars offers the potential to measure the structure and biochemistry of vegetation simultaneously, using range resolved spectral indices to overcome the confounding effects in passive optical measurements. However, the reflectance of leaves depends on the angle of incidence, and if this dependence varies between wavelengths, the resulting spectral indices will also vary with the angle of incidence, complicating their use in separating structural and biochemical effects in vegetation canopies. The Salford Advanced Laser Canopy Analyser (SALCA) dual-wavelength terrestrial laser scanner was used to measure the angular dependence of reflectance for a range of leaves at the wavelengths used by the new generation of multiwavelength lidars, 1063 and 1545 nm, as used by SALCA, DWEL, and the Optech Titan. The influence of the angle of incidence on the normalized difference index (NDI) of these wavelengths was also assessed. The reflectance at both wavelengths depended on the angle of incidence and could be well modelled as a cosine. The change in the NDI with the leaf angle of incidence was small compared with the observed difference in the NDI between fresh and dry leaves and between leaf and bark. Therefore, it is concluded that angular effects will not significantly impact leaf moisture retrievals or prevent leaf/bark separation for the wavelengths used in the new generation of 1063- and 1545-nm multiwavelength lidars.

[1]  Rachel Gaulton,et al.  The potential of dual-wavelength laser scanning for estimating vegetation moisture content , 2013 .

[2]  K. Olaf Niemann,et al.  Addressing the Effects of Canopy Structure on the Remote Sensing of Foliar Chemistry of a 3-Dimensional, Radiometrically Porous Surface , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[3]  A. Strahler,et al.  BRDF laboratory measurements , 2000 .

[4]  Teemu Hakala,et al.  Fast and nondestructive method for leaf level chlorophyll estimation using hyperspectral LiDAR , 2014 .

[5]  Bo Zhu,et al.  Improving Backscatter Intensity Calibration for Multispectral LiDAR , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Felix Morsdorf,et al.  Assessing forest structural and physiological information content of multi-spectral LiDAR waveforms by radiative transfer modelling , 2009 .

[7]  Teemu Hakala,et al.  Incidence Angle Dependency of Leaf Vegetation Indices from Hyperspectral Lidar Measurements , 2016 .

[8]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  3D leaf water content mapping using terrestrial laser scanner backscatter intensity with radiometric correction , 2015 .

[9]  J. Smith,et al.  Bidirectional scattering of light from tree leaves , 1989 .

[10]  V. Wichmann,et al.  EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL OF MULTISPECTRAL AIRBORNE LIDAR FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING AND LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION , 2015 .

[11]  W. Allen,et al.  Transmission of isotropic light across a dielectric surface in two and three dimensions. , 1973 .

[12]  M. Herold,et al.  Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning , 2015 .

[13]  F. Mark Danson,et al.  Developing a dual-wavelength full-waveform terrestrial laser scanner to characterize forest canopy structure , 2014 .

[14]  Stuart R. Phinn,et al.  Direct retrieval of canopy gap probability using airborne waveform lidar , 2013 .

[15]  D. Harding,et al.  ICESat waveform measurements of within‐footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure , 2005 .

[16]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Finding Leaves in the Forest: The Dual-Wavelength Echidna Lidar , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  S. Ustin,et al.  LEAF OPTICAL PROPERTIES: A STATE OF THE ART , 2000 .

[18]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches , 2007 .

[19]  F. Mark Danson,et al.  Radiometric calibration of a dual-wavelength terrestrial laser scanner using neural networks , 2016 .

[20]  David J. Harding,et al.  Laser transmitter design and performance for the slope imaging multi-polarization photon-counting lidar (SIMPL) instrument , 2016, SPIE LASE.

[21]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Waveform lidar over vegetation: An evaluation of inversion methods for estimating return energy , 2015 .

[22]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Characterising forest gap fraction with terrestrial lidar and photography: An examination of relative limitations , 2014 .

[23]  J. Eitel,et al.  Assessment of crop foliar nitrogen using a novel dual-wavelength laser system and implications for conducting laser-based plant physiology , 2014 .

[24]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Radiometric Calibration of a Dual-Wavelength, Full-Waveform Terrestrial Lidar , 2016, Sensors.

[25]  James R. Irons,et al.  Goniometric Observations Of Light Scattered From Soils And Leaves , 1988, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[26]  M. Verstraete,et al.  Estimating leaf area distribution in savanna trees from terrestrial LiDAR measurements , 2011 .