Knowledge Maps and Their Use in Computer-Based Collaborative Learning Environments

Conceptual learning of 13 graduate students at a university in the southeastern United States was studied during a six-week course that employed the Internet for collaborative learning of on-line articles. Five groups were formed with each creating a knowledge map—a diagram that graphically arranges and interconnects concepts to show their relationship—during the first and fifth week of the course. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis was used to study the change in each group's mapping over time to determine the influence of a computer-based collaborative learning environment on conceptual understanding. MDS analysis was also used to compare a knowledge map and a similarity rating (of the same 10 concepts) completed by each student at the end of the course. Results of the first analysis indicated that, despite the collaborative nature of the learning environment, groups did not become more similar over time in their understanding of key concepts. However, the second analysis revealed common student perceptions about the dimensions that characterized the conceptual relationships involved. Importantly, this analysis provided evidence that knowledge maps are comparable to rating instruments, thereby supporting recent research claims that they are valid representations of conceptual knowledge. Prescriptions are made for the expanded role of MDS in collaborative knowledge mapping activities.

[1]  E. Baker,et al.  Construct Validation of an Approach to Modeling Cognitive Structure of U.S. History Knowledge , 1996 .

[2]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Multirelational semantic maps , 1989 .

[3]  John E. Readence,et al.  A Quantitative and Qualitative Review of Graphic Organizer Research , 1984 .

[4]  Diana C. Rice,et al.  Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in the Science Classroom: Must Different Methods Compete?. , 1998 .

[5]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung,et al.  Reliability and validity of a computer-based knowledge mapping system to measure content understanding , 1999 .

[6]  P. Thorndyke,et al.  Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  H. Suen,et al.  Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicality , 1999 .

[8]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[9]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Feasibility of Machine Scoring of Concept Maps. , 1997 .

[10]  Barbara A. Beyerbach,et al.  Using a computerized concept mapping program to assess preservice teachers' thinking about effective teaching , 1990 .

[11]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Structural Knowledge: Techniques for Representing, Conveying, and Acquiring Structural Knowledge , 1993 .

[12]  R. Shavelson,et al.  On the Cognitive Validity of Interpretations of Scores from Alternative Concept-Mapping Techniques. , 1999 .

[13]  James H. Wandersee,et al.  Concept Mapping and the Cartography of Cognition. , 1990 .

[14]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MAPPING IN THE CLASSROOM: A TOOL FOR EXAMINING THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDINGS , 1999 .

[15]  Lynne Anderson-Inman,et al.  Computer-Based Concept Mapping: Active Studying for Active Learners. , 1993 .

[16]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Instructional Design: Implications from Cognitive Science , 1991 .

[17]  K. Fisher Semantic Networking: The New Kid on the Block , 1990 .

[18]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung,et al.  Computer-Based Collaborative Knowledge Mapping To Measure Team Processes and Team Outcomes. , 1999 .

[19]  Roger M. Downs,et al.  Maps and metaphors , 1981 .

[20]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[21]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage? , 1991 .

[22]  R. Shavelson On Concept Maps as Potential "Authentic" Assessments in Science. Indirect Approaches to Knowledge Representation of High School Science. , 1993 .

[23]  Rose J. Setze,et al.  Using concept mapping to develop a conceptual framework of staff's views of a supported employment program for individuals with severe mental illness. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[24]  Dansereau,et al.  Spatial-Semantic Display Processing: The Role of Spatial Structure on Recall , 1997, Contemporary educational psychology.

[25]  W. Trochim Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? , 1989 .

[26]  Eugene V. Aidman,et al.  Academic Assessment through Computerized Concept Mapping: Validating a Method of Implicit Map Reconstruction. , 1998 .

[27]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment. , 1996 .

[28]  Ann E. Barron,et al.  Optical Media in Education. , 1993 .

[29]  J. Novak Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning , 1990 .

[30]  D. Wiegmann,et al.  Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing , 1992 .