Virtual group dynamics.

The various forms of Internet groups share many similarities to groups that exist in the offline world, but there are also critical differences. The authors examine traditional definitions of groups and how Internet groups fit into those existing definitions. They provide an analysis of relevant aspects that make virtual groups similar to and different from nonelectronic groups, and they examine the ways in which Internet groups function. Individual motivations for joining online groups and the consequences of virtual group membership are also discussed. Over the past decade the number of individuals regularly accessing the Internet has increased exponentially. According to recent research by Nie and Erbring (2000) the number of Americans online has risen to 55%. Worldwide, the number of people using the Internet has risen above 450 million, and that number is expected to double within the next year. Interpersonal communication has become the primary use of the Internet at home (Kraut, Mukopadhyay, Szczypula, Kiesler, & Scherlis, 1998), and people are increasingly turning to the Internet to fulfill important social and psychological needs. One of the most basic interpersonal needs is to “belong,” to feel that one is a member of a group of others who share similar interests and goals, and to feel that one is a valued (and unique) member of that group (Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Brewer, 1991). On the Internet, there are a wealth of venues where one can connect with like-minded others who share core interests and values and thus fulfill this important need. Chat rooms, newsgroups, electronic mailing lists, message boards, interactive games, and major interactive Web sites provide individuals with the opportunity to join existing online groups or to create their own. The various forms of Internet groups share many similarities with groups that exist in the

[1]  Jr. French,et al.  The disruption and cohesion of groups. , 1941 .

[2]  L. Festinger Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[3]  K. Back Influence through social communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of de-individuation in a group , 1952 .

[5]  J. Gillon,et al.  Group dynamics , 1996 .

[6]  V. Cervin Individual behavior in social situations: its relation to anxiety, neuroticism, and group solidarity. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  The social dimensions of a twelve-man jury table. , 1961 .

[8]  F. Fiedler A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness1 , 1964 .

[9]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  B. Latané,et al.  Shared stress and interpersonal attraction , 1966 .

[11]  A. Zander,et al.  Members' test anxiety and competence: determinants of a group's aspirations. , 1966, Journal of personality.

[12]  Group risk taking as a function of members' anxiety and defensiveness levels. , 1967 .

[13]  M. Wallach,et al.  Group risk taking as a function of members' anxiety and defensiveness levels. , 1966, Journal of personality.

[14]  P. Zimbardo The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[15]  M. H. Marx Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1969. , 1971 .

[16]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Deviance In Dark , 1973 .

[17]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Breakups Before Marriage: The End of 103 Affairs , 1976 .

[18]  L. Downing,et al.  Deindividuation and valence of cues: effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[20]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[21]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Symbolic self-completion , 1982 .

[22]  M. Leary Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement. , 1983, Journal of personality assessment.

[23]  E. E. Jones Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships , 1984 .

[24]  S. Reicher Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioural effects of de‐individuation in conditions of high and low group salience* , 1984 .

[25]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[26]  G. Clore,et al.  The attraction hypothesis: do similar attitudes affect anything? , 1986 .

[27]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[28]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Social psychology, 5th ed. , 1988 .

[29]  T. Pruzinsky,et al.  Mirror, Mirror: The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life. , 1988 .

[30]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  Group dynamics, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[31]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[32]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Opening up: The healing power of confuling in others , 1990 .

[33]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[35]  Mark W. Baldwin,et al.  Relational schemas and the processing of social information. , 1992 .

[36]  Martin Lea,et al.  Contexts of computer-mediated communication , 1992 .

[37]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[38]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[39]  D. E. Frable,et al.  Being and feeling unique: statistical deviance and psychological marginality. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[40]  M. Hogg Group Cohesiveness: A Critical Review and Some New Directions , 1993 .

[41]  K. Davis,et al.  Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: a longitudinal analysis. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  K. Deaux,et al.  Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. , 1994 .

[43]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Mark Attridge,et al.  Predicting relationship stability from both partners versus one. , 1995 .

[45]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[46]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[47]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[48]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[49]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Communication and information: alternative uses of the Internet in households , 1998, CHI.

[50]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[51]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Coming Out in the Age of the Internet: Identity “Demarginalization” Through Virtual Group Participation , 1998 .

[52]  Renee Crevelli-Gross ON MAKING FRIENDS , 1998 .

[53]  Susan M. Andersen,et al.  Relationships from the Past in the Present: Significant-Other Representations and Transference in Interpersonal Life , 1999 .

[54]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Social Interaction on the Internet: A Conceptual Framework , 1999 .

[55]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content , 1999 .

[56]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social identity, normative content, and "deindividuation" in computer-mediated groups , 1999 .

[57]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .

[58]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. , 2001 .

[59]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity, leadership, and power , 2001 .

[60]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .

[61]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[62]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .

[63]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[64]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .