Developing a virtual stiffness-damping system for airfoil aeroelasticity testing

Abstract In this research a two-degrees-of-freedom (2-DOF) virtual stiffness-damping system (VSDS) is developed to facilitate industrial and laboratory testing of airfoil aeroelasticity instability. Other existing test-beds in this field rely on elastic elements or structures to set airfoil elasticity in tests, which can be costly and inconvenient in cases of frequent stiffness adjustment across a wide range. A possible alternative is the VSDS that utilizes electric drives to simulate structural elasticity and damping, as seen in marine and bio-mechanical engineering, which however, cannot be directly applied to airfoil aeroelasticity testing (AAT) due to operation requirements and conditions being different. Therefore, in this study a new VSDS is developed specifically for AAT. Firstly, the concept of 1-DOF VSDS is extended to 2 DOFs, with the dynamics coupling between each DOF addressed at the stage of operation principle determination, by the proposed direct force/torque regulation with force/torque feedback. Secondly, resolution loss in position/velocity measurement is identified as a main problem associated with the non-reduction transmission required, and is solved by a modified extended-state observer (MESO) proposed for fast position/velocity estimation. Thirdly, system identification and calibration procedures involved in developing the new VSDS are reduced to minimum through a robust force/torque tracking controller design, with detailed numerical study on parametric analysis given. As validated in wind-tunnel experiments the new VSDS can closely track the desired force/torque and provide satisfactory virtual stiffness and damping in AAT.

[1]  M. Tursini,et al.  Speed measurement algorithms for low-resolution incremental encoder equipped drives: a comparative analysis , 2007, 2007 International Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics.

[2]  Paolo Mantegazza,et al.  A comparison of methods used for the identification of flutter from experimental data , 1987 .

[3]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE HOPF BIFURCATION POINT FOR AEROELASTIC SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[4]  Michael M. Bernitsas,et al.  High-damping, high-Reynolds VIV tests for energy harnessing using the VIVACE converter , 2011 .

[5]  Hassan Zohoor,et al.  Aeroelastic modeling and dynamic analysis of a wind turbine rotor by considering geometric nonlinearities , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[6]  Edward Burnett,et al.  Design and flight test of active flutter suppression on the X-56A multi-utility technology test-bed aircraft , 2016, The Aeronautical Journal.

[7]  Lei Chen,et al.  A Novel Actuator Controller: Delivering a Practical Solution to Realization of Active-Truss-Based Morphing Wings , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Sunetra Sarkar,et al.  Investigations on precursor measures for aeroelastic flutter , 2018 .

[9]  Muhammad R. Hajj,et al.  Modeling and identification of freeplay nonlinearity , 2012 .

[10]  Pezhman Mardanpour,et al.  Effect of shooting and blast-induced gust on nonlinear aeroelastic stability and behavior of high-aspect ratio wing , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[11]  Yuan-Cheng Fung,et al.  An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity , 1955 .

[12]  Eric Hu,et al.  Parametric Analysis for Robust Force/Torque Tracking Control of a Virtual Stiffness-Damping System in Aeroelastic Instability Testing , 2019, 2019 American Control Conference (ACC).

[13]  Dominique Poirel,et al.  Bayesian analysis of the flutter margin method in aeroelasticity , 2016 .

[14]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Study of airfoil gust response alleviation using an electro-magnetic dry friction damper. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[15]  Alonzo Kelly,et al.  Mobile Robotics: Mathematics, Models, and Methods , 2013 .

[16]  Michael M. Bernitsas,et al.  Virtual spring-damping system for flow-induced motion experiments , 2015 .

[17]  Vineeth Nair,et al.  Multi-fractality in aeroelastic response as a precursor to flutter , 2017 .

[18]  Mingxing Fang,et al.  Improving Disturbance-Rejection Performance Based on an Equivalent-Input-Disturbance Approach , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  Lei Chen,et al.  Nonlinear optimal control for active suppression of airfoil flutter via a novel neural-network-based controller , 2017, 2017 25th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED).

[20]  Lei Chen,et al.  Adaptive nonlinear optimal control for active suppression of airfoil flutter via a novel neural-network-based controller , 2018 .

[21]  Kwok Leung Lai,et al.  Design and experiment of data-driven modeling and flutter control of a prototype wing , 2017 .

[22]  Domingos A. Rade,et al.  Dynamic assessment of nonlinear typical section aeroviscoelastic systems using fractional derivative-based viscoelastic model , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[23]  Michael M. Bernitsas,et al.  Virtual damper-spring system for VIV experiments and hydrokinetic energy conversion , 2011 .

[24]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATION OF MARINE CABLES: EXPERIMENTS USING FORCE FEEDBACK , 1997 .

[25]  Thomas W. Strganac,et al.  Aeroelastic Response of a Rigid Wing Supported by Nonlinear Springs , 1998 .

[26]  Rui Vasconcellos,et al.  Characterization of nonlinear behavior of an airfoil under stall-induced pitching oscillations , 2016 .

[27]  Stuart J. Price,et al.  NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS OF AN AIR FOIL FORCED TO OSCILLATE IN DYNAMIC STALL , 1996 .

[28]  Kwok-wai Chung,et al.  Airfoil motion in subsonic flow with strong cubic nonlinear restoring forces , 2005 .

[29]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal control: linear quadratic methods , 1990 .

[30]  Eric Hu,et al.  Developing a Virtual Stiffness-Damping System for Airfoil Aeroelasticity Testing , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[31]  Maziar Arjomandi,et al.  Harnessing hydro-kinetic energy from wake-induced vibration using virtual mass spring damper system , 2015 .

[32]  Jingqing Han,et al.  From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control , 2009, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[33]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Speed Measurement Error Suppression for PMSM Control System Using Self-Adaption Kalman Observer , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[34]  Franz S. Hover,et al.  Forces on oscillating uniform and tapered cylinders in cross flow , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[35]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of gust response for a wing–store model with freeplay , 2006 .

[36]  Yau Shu Wong,et al.  An expert system for predicting nonlinear aeroelastic behavior of an airfoil , 2009 .

[37]  R.D. Lorenz,et al.  High resolution velocity estimation for all digital, AC servo drives , 1988, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[38]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Comparison of Theory and Experiment for Nonlinear Flutter and Stall Response of Helicopter Blade , 1991 .