Concept Synthesis Using Logic of Prototypes and Counterexamples: A Graded Consequence Approach

This paper is a preliminary step towards proposing a scheme for synthesis of a concept out of a set of concepts focusing on the following aspects. The first is that the semantics of a set of simple (or independent) concepts would be understood in terms of its prototypes and counterexamples, where these instances of positive and negative cases may vary with the change of the context, i.e., a set of situations which works as a precursor of an information system. Secondly, based on the classification of a concept in terms of the situations where it strictly applies and where not, a degree of application of the concept to some new situation/world would be determined. This layer of reasoning is named as logic of prototypes and counterexamples. In the next layer the method of concept synthesis would be designed as a graded concept based on the already developed degree based approach for logic of prototypes and counterexamples.

[1]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[2]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Interactive Computational Systems: Rough Granular Approach , 2012, CS&P.

[3]  Mihir K. Chakraborty,et al.  Many-Valued Logics, Fuzzy Logics and Graded Consequence: A Comparative Appraisal , 2013, ICLA.

[4]  Mihir K. Chakraborty,et al.  Graded Consequence with Fuzzy Set of Premises , 2014, Fundam. Informaticae.

[5]  Benjamín R. C. Bedregal,et al.  Some Instances of Graded Consequence in the Context of Interval-Valued Semantics , 2015, ICLA.

[6]  Mihir K. Chakraborty,et al.  Graded consequence revisited , 2010, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Risk Management and Interactive Computational Systems , 2012 .

[8]  Elie Sanchez,et al.  Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web , 2005 .

[9]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Layered Learning for Concept Synthesis , 2004, Trans. Rough Sets.

[10]  D. Dubois,et al.  ROUGH FUZZY SETS AND FUZZY ROUGH SETS , 1990 .

[11]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Transactions on Rough Sets I , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Putting Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets Together , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.

[13]  Mihir K. Chakraborty,et al.  Graded Consequence: Further Studies , 1995, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[14]  Mihir K. Chakraborty,et al.  Graded Consequence and Some Metalogical Notions Generalized , 1997, Fundam. Informaticae.

[15]  Agata Ciabattoni,et al.  On the (fuzzy) logical content of CADIAG-2 , 2010, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  Logic and Its Applications , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Information Granules and Rough-Neural Computing , 2004 .

[18]  S. Dutta,et al.  Grade in Metalogical Notions: a Comparative Study of Fuzzy Logics , 2014, SOCO 2014.

[19]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough Sets and Vague Concept Approximation: From Sample Approximation to Adaptive Learning , 2006, Trans. Rough Sets.

[20]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Hierarchical modelling in searching for complex patterns: constrained sums of information systems , 2005, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..