Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.

PURPOSE The purposes of this in vitro study were to: (1) compare the accuracy of a laser fluorescence system (DIAGNOdent) in proximal caries diagnosis in primary teeth with that of bitewing radiography, using the histological examination as a gold standard; and (2) evaluate the reliability of the DIAGNOdent examination. METHODS Included were 107 extracted primary molars without obvious cavities on proximal surfaces. The teeth were examined by 2 examiners using DIAGNOdent directly on the lesions (without contact; ie, proximal surfaces were not in contact with other teeth) and indirectly (with contact; ie, proximal surfaces were in contact with adjacent teeth). To simulate contacting teeth, the studied surface was set adjacent to a sound surface in a wax base. The contacting teeth were also diagnosed using bitewing radiography. Results of the diagnoses were compared with a histological gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each diagnostic system. Inter- and intraexaminer reliabilities of DIAGNOdent were calculated using intraclass correlation (ICC). RESULTS At the dentine caries (D3) level, the sensitivities of bitewing radiography (with contacting teeth) and DIAGNOdent with and without contacting teeth (direct application) were 0.41, 0.85 and 0.93, respectively, and the specificities were 1, 0.89, and 0.87, respectively. Both inter- and intraexaminer reliabilities using DIAGNOdent with and without contacting teeth (direct application) were very high (ICC=0.97 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS The reliability of DIAGNOdent is very high and its diagnostic validity (sum of sensitivity and specificity) is higher than that of bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection in primary teeth.

[1]  J. Murray,et al.  The prevalence and progression of approximal caries in the deciduous dentition in British children , 1978, British Dental Journal.

[2]  B. Angmar-Mansson,et al.  Advances in Methods for Diagnosing Coronal Caries-a Review , 1993, Advances in dental research.

[3]  A. El-Housseiny,et al.  Evaluation of visual, explorer, and a laser device for detection of early occlusal caries. , 2002, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[4]  R. Ellwood,et al.  An in vitro Comparison of a Combined FOTI/Visual Examination of Occlusal Caries with Other Caries Diagnostic Methods and the Effect of Stain on Their Diagnostic Performance , 2003, Caries Research.

[5]  Xie-Qi Shi,et al.  Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth-surface caries: an in vitro study , 2001, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[6]  N. Pitts.  Systems for grading approximal carious lesions and overlaps diagnosed from bitewing radiographs. Proposals for future standardization. , 1984, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[7]  P R Wilson,et al.  Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography. , 1989, Archives of oral biology.

[8]  A. Lussi,et al.  Performance of Conventional and New Methods for the Detection of Occlusal Caries in Deciduous Teeth , 2003, Caries Research.

[9]  K V Mortimer,et al.  The relationship of deciduous enamel structure to dental disease. , 1970, Caries research.

[10]  Mortimer Kv.  The Relationship of Deciduous Enamel Structure to Dental Disease , 1970 .

[11]  A. Lussi,et al.  Correlation between fissure discoloration, Diagnodent measurements, and caries depth: an in vitro study. , 2003, Pediatric dentistry.

[12]  Xie-Qi Shi,et al.  Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for Quantification of Smooth Surface Caries , 2000, Caries Research.

[13]  Hiroko Yamamoto,et al.  In vitro study of caries detection through sound dentin using a laser fluorescence device, DIAGNOdent. , 2003, European journal of oral sciences.

[14]  F. J. Hill,et al.  Validity and reproducibility of clinical examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiology for the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study. , 1993, Caries research.

[15]  D. Attrill,et al.  Diagnostics: Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods , 2001, British Dental Journal.

[16]  V. Anttonen,et al.  Clinical Study of the Use of the Laser Fluorescence Device DIAGNOdent for Detection of Occlusal Caries in Children , 2003, Caries Research.

[17]  Xie-Qi Shi,et al.  Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor: in vitro comparison , 2002, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[18]  V. Anttonen,et al.  A follow-up study of the use of DIAGNOdent for monitoring fissure caries in children. , 2004, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[19]  A Wenzel,et al.  The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[20]  M. Downer.  Concurrent validity of an epidemiological diagnostic system for caries with the histological appearance of extracted teeth as validating criterion. , 1975, Caries research.

[21]  A. Lussi,et al.  Performance and Reproducibility of a Laser Fluorescence System for Detection of Occlusal Caries in vitro , 1999, Caries Research.

[22]  C. Am,et al.  In vitro study of laser diode 655 nm diagnosis of occlusal caries. , 2002 .

[23]  C. Feldens,et al.  An in vitro study of the correlation between clinical and radiographic examinations of proximal carious lesions in primary molars. , 2003, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[24]  I. Kaffe,et al.  Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[25]  E. Kidd,et al.  An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds , 1997, British Dental Journal.

[26]  M Russell,et al.  Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography. , 1993, Caries research.

[27]  N. Pitts,et al.  An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth. , 1992, Caries research.

[28]  U. Welander,et al.  Occlusal Caries Detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and Radiography: An in vitro Comparison , 2000, Caries Research.

[29]  A. Plasschaert,et al.  Reliability and validity issues of laser fluorescence measurements in occlusal caries diagnosis. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.