Echocardiographic anatomy of ascending aorta dilatation: correlations with aortic valve morphology and function.

BACKGROUND Different anatomical forms of proximal aortic dilations associated with aortic valve disease can be distinguished by echocardiography. Differences in the anatomy could reflect different pathogeneses and need for different therapeutic approaches. The present study assessed the clinical features associated to each anatomical form, particularly focusing on the relations with valve morphology and function. METHODS Trans-thoracic and trans-esophageal echocardiography reports of 552 adult patients (mean age 60.4+/-12.8 years; 379 male) with mild to severe proximal aorta dilation were reviewed. The relationships between the anatomy of aorta dilatation (distinguished into "root type" dilatation, with maximal enlargement at the sinuses, and "mid-ascending type", with maximal diameter at the mid-ascending tract) and aortic valve morphology (tricuspid/bicuspid) and function (normal/stenosis/regurgitation) were assessed. The relations with other clinico-echocardiographic variables were also tested in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS A "root type" dilatation was found in 4.9% tricuspid patients with stenosis, 32.3% with regurgitation, 22.5% with normal valve function (p=0.018). Dilatation prevailed at the mid-ascending tract in patients with bicuspid aortic valve, irrespective of valve function (stenotic: 92.9%, regurgitant: 87.9%, normal: 94.3%; p=0.23). Predominant root involvement was significantly more prevalent in male patients (24.8% versus 5.2% in females; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, predominant aortic valve regurgitation (OR=1.83; p=0.028) independently predicted root site, while predominant aortic valve stenosis (OR=3.70; p=0.001), bicuspidity (OR=2.90; p=0.005) and female sex (OR=6.10; p<0.001) predicted mid-ascending site. CONCLUSIONS Pathogenetical considerations arise from the evidence of preferential mid-ascending localization of bicuspid-associated aortic dilatations. This finding is consistent with previous studies on bicuspid valve models revealing a wall stress overload beyond the sino-tubular ridge.

[1]  T. Treasure Cardiovascular surgery for Marfan syndrome , 2000, Heart.

[2]  V. McKusick Association of congenital bicuspid aortic valve and erdheim's cystic medial necrosis. , 1972, Lancet.

[3]  T. Sundt,et al.  Options for repair of a bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortic aneurysm. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Reduction aortoplasty for dilatation of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  G. Sterrantino,et al.  Aortic Connective Tissue in Ageing—A Biochemical Study , 1985, Angiology.

[6]  G. Thiene,et al.  Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves , 1999, Heart.

[7]  J. Aarnoudse,et al.  POST-PARTUM PULMONARY ŒDEMA ASSOCIATED WITH PREVENTIVE THERAPY FOR PREMATURE LABOUR , 1979, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Arnett,et al.  Aortic Root Dilatation at Sinuses of Valsalva and Aortic Regurgitation in Hypertensive and Normotensive Subjects: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network Study , 2001, Hypertension.

[9]  M. Guertin,et al.  Progressive dilation of the diameter of the aortic root in adults with a bicuspid aortic valve , 2003, Cardiology in the Young.

[10]  A. Tedgui,et al.  Cellular mechanics and gene expression in blood vessels. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  N C Nanda,et al.  Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Effect of hypertension on aortic root size and prevalence of aortic regurgitation. , 1996, Hypertension.

[13]  A. Weyman,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of progression of aortic regurgitation. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  R. Dore,et al.  Ascending aortic aneurysms treated by cuneiform resection and end-to-end anastomosis through a ministernotomy. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  M. Crawford,et al.  Prevalence of aortic root dilatation and small aortic roots in valvular aortic stenosis. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  J. McCullough,et al.  Surgical treatment of the dilated ascending aorta: when and how? , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  I. Schnittger,et al.  Clinical outcome in the Marfan syndrome with ascending aortic dilatation followed annually by echocardiography. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail? , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  R. Devereux,et al.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  H. Schaff,et al.  A method of repair for asymmetric aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  A. G. Gittenberger-de Groot,et al.  The neural crest as a possible pathogenetic factor in coarctation of the aorta and bicuspid aortic valve. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. , 2000, Circulation.

[23]  A. Della Corte,et al.  Different patterns of extracellular matrix protein expression in the convexity and the concavity of the dilated aorta with bicuspid aortic valve: preliminary results. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  M. Ferencik,et al.  Changes in size of ascending aorta and aortic valve function with time in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valves. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  H. Barner,et al.  Tailoring aortoplasty for repair of fusiform ascending aortic aneurysms. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.