Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading

With strict fixation, a small uniform target of medium contrast, placed at 10 deg eccentricity, faded much faster when presented on a dynamic random noise background than on either a static random noise background or a uniform background of the same luminance. Time to first disappearance was between 10 and 16 sec when the background was dynamic, 26 sec when it was static, and 57 sec when it was uniform. Times were shortest for temporal noise frequencies of the background between 3.5 and 15 Hz. These findings are unexpected: the frequent change of pixel contrast at the edge of the target should perceptually enhance the border, make it less susceptible to local adaptation, and prevent fading. Instead, dynamic random noise facilitates, rather than suppresses fading. Three potential mechanisms are discussed: edge perturbation, jerk effect and surround induction.

[1]  U. Schiefer,et al.  Rauschfeld-Untersuchungsergebnisse mit dem Tübinger Elektronik Kampimeter (TEC) : ein Vergleich mit herkömmlichen perimetrischen Verfahren , 1990 .

[2]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity of complex cells in cat striate cortex to relative motion , 1984, Brain Research.

[3]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Effects of isoluminant-background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: Interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels , 1990, Vision Research.

[4]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Petersen,et al.  Visual response properties of neurons in four extrastriate visual areas of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus): a quantitative comparison of medial, dorsomedial, dorsolateral, and middle temporal areas. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision , 1991, Nature.

[7]  Bruno Breitmeyer,et al.  The lateral effect of oscillation of peripheral luminance gratings on the foveal increment threshold , 1980, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Mackay,et al.  Modulatory influences of moving textured backgrounds on responsiveness of simple cells in feline striate cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  D. M. MACKAY,et al.  Elevation of Visual Threshold by Displacement of Retinal Image , 1970, Nature.

[10]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Flicker adaptation in the peripheral retina , 1987, Vision Research.

[11]  E. Aulhorn,et al.  Rauschfeldkampimetrie - Eine neuartige perimetrische Untersuchungsweise , 1988 .

[12]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Movement adaptation in the peripheral retina , 1984, Vision Research.

[13]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex , 1992, Nature.