Evaluation of Advanced Precursor Determination for Tandem Mass Tag (TMT)-Based Quantitative Proteomics across Instrument Platforms.

Tandem mass tag (TMT)-based quantitation is a strong modality for quantitative proteomics, as samples can be multiplexed, creating large-scale data sets with high precision and minimal missing values. However, coisolation/cofragmentation of near isobaric, coeluting precursor peptide analytes has been well-documented to show ratio compression, compromising the accuracy of peptide/protein quantitation. Advanced peak determination (APD) is a new peak-picking algorithm that shows improved identification of peak detection in survey scans (MS1) to increase the number of precursors selected for unimolecular dissociation (MS2). To increase the number of these "features" selected for MS2 APD purposefully selects multiple peptide precursors of very similar m/ z that often derive from different proteins-a major source of ratio compression in TMT quantification. Here, we evaluate the effects of various data acquisition parameters combined with APD on ratio compression. We find that data acquisition with APD enabled results in more coisolated precursors, more mixed spectra, and in turn, fewer peptide spectral matches, especially at standard on-column loads. We conclude that APD should not be utilized for isobaric tagging, MS2-based experiments.

[1]  S. Carr,et al.  Discovery of proteins associated with a predefined genomic locus in living cells via dCAS9-APEX-mediated proximity labeling , 2018, Nature Methods.

[2]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  Proteome-Wide Evaluation of Two Common Protein Quantification Methods. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  Nicholas W. Kwiecien,et al.  Improved Precursor Characterization for Data-Dependent Mass Spectrometry. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  S. Gygi,et al.  Multidimensional Tracking of GPCR Signaling via Peroxidase-Catalyzed Proximity Labeling , 2017, Cell.

[5]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  A Triple Knockout (TKO) Proteomics Standard for Diagnosing Ion Interference in Isobaric Labeling Experiments , 2016, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[6]  Michael L. Gatza,et al.  Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signaling in breast cancer , 2016, Nature.

[7]  B. Kuster,et al.  Measuring and managing ratio compression for accurate iTRAQ/TMT quantification. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[8]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  Increasing the multiplexing capacity of TMTs using reporter ion isotopologues with isobaric masses. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  S. Gygi,et al.  MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric labeling-based multiplexed quantitative proteomics , 2011, Nature Methods.

[10]  Josselin Noirel,et al.  Minimising iTRAQ ratio compression through understanding LC‐MS elution dependence and high‐resolution HILIC fractionation , 2011, Proteomics.

[11]  S. Shirran,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of iTRAQ quantification by nLC-ESI MSMS and nLC-MALDI MSMS methods , 2010, Journal of proteomics.

[12]  Ishtiaq Rehman,et al.  iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly". , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  M. Mann,et al.  Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips , 2007, Nature Protocols.