The future of skin toxicology testing – Three-dimensional bioprinting meets microfluidics

Abstract Over the years, the field of toxicology testing has evolved tremendously from the use of animal models to the adaptation of in vitro testing models. In this perspective article, we aim to bridge the gap between the regulatory authorities who performed the testing and approval of new chemicals and the scientists who designed and fabricated these in vitro testing models. An in-depth discussion of existing toxicology testing guidelines for skin tissue models (definition, testing models, principle, and limitations) is first presented to have a good understanding of the stringent requirements that are necessary during the testing process. Next, the ideal requirements of toxicology testing platform (in terms of fabrication, testing, and screening process) are then discussed. We envisioned that the integration of three-dimensional bioprinting within miniaturized microfluidics platform would bring about a paradigm shift in the field of toxicology testing; providing standardization in the fabrication process, accurate, and rapid deposition of test chemicals, real-time monitoring, and high throughput screening for more efficient skin toxicology testing.

[1]  Sheila MacNeil,et al.  Culture of skin cells in 3D rather than 2D improves their ability to survive exposure to cytotoxic agents. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[2]  May Win Naing,et al.  Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering , 2016 .

[3]  Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser,et al.  Engineering an in vitro air-blood barrier by 3D bioprinting , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[4]  P. Vogt,et al.  Tissue Engineered Skin Substitutes Created by Laser-Assisted Bioprinting Form Skin-Like Structures in the Dorsal Skin Fold Chamber in Mice , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  M. Schäfer-Korting,et al.  The Phenion® Full-Thickness Skin Model for Percutaneous Absorption Testing , 2009, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[6]  Matthias W Laschke,et al.  Life is 3D: Boosting Spheroid Function for Tissue Engineering. , 2017, Trends in biotechnology.

[7]  T. Park,et al.  Integration of Cell Culture and Microfabrication Technology , 2003, Biotechnology progress.

[8]  B. Mosadegh,et al.  Integrated Elastomeric Components for Autonomous Regulation of Sequential and Oscillatory Flow Switching in Microfluidic Devices , 2010, Nature physics.

[9]  A. Schambach,et al.  Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Matthew E. Pepper,et al.  Characterizing the effects of cell settling on bioprinter output , 2012, Biofabrication.

[11]  Wai Yee Yeong,et al.  Resolution and shape in bioprinting: Strategizing towards complex tissue and organ printing , 2019, Applied Physics Reviews.

[12]  Stephanie H Mathes,et al.  The use of skin models in drug development. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[13]  Yuri Dancik,et al.  Full-thickness human skin-on-chip with enhanced epidermal morphogenesis and barrier function , 2017 .

[14]  Wei Zheng,et al.  An Alternative Direct Compound Dispensing Method Using the HP D300 Digital Dispenser , 2013, Journal of laboratory automation.

[15]  Michael L Shuler,et al.  Pumpless microfluidic platform for drug testing on human skin equivalents. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[16]  Sheila MacNeil,et al.  Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin , 2007, Nature.

[17]  Diego Velasco,et al.  3D bioprinting of functional human skin: production and in vivo analysis , 2016, Biofabrication.

[18]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Bioprinted Amniotic Fluid‐Derived Stem Cells Accelerate Healing of Large Skin Wounds , 2012, Stem cells translational medicine.

[19]  May Win Naing,et al.  Organ-Derived Decellularized Extracellular Matrix: A Game Changer for Bioink Manufacturing? , 2018, Trends in biotechnology.

[20]  Karl R Edminster,et al.  Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[21]  S. Yoo,et al.  On‐demand three‐dimensional freeform fabrication of multi‐layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  May Win Naing,et al.  Potential of Bioprinted Films for Skin Tissue Engineering , 2014 .

[23]  D. H. Randle,et al.  Drug Discovery Goes Three-Dimensional: Goodbye to Flat High-Throughput Screening? , 2015, Assay and drug development technologies.

[24]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Human Skin Equivalents Demonstrate Need for Neuro‐Immuno‐Cutaneous System , 2018, Advanced biosystems.

[25]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. , 2018, Biomaterials science.

[26]  S Vijayavenkataraman,et al.  3D bioprinting of skin: a state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes , 2016, Biofabrication.

[27]  William H. Grover,et al.  Development and multiplexed control of latching pneumatic valves using microfluidic logical structures. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Deepak Choudhury,et al.  The arrival of commercial bioprinters – Towards 3D bioprinting revolution! , 2018, International journal of bioprinting.

[29]  D. Cho,et al.  Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system , 2017, Biofabrication.

[30]  Min Jae Song,et al.  Fully Three-Dimensional Bioprinted Skin Equivalent Constructs with Validated Morphology and Barrier Function , 2019, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[31]  Fiona Sewell,et al.  Testing Chemical Safety: What Is Needed to Ensure the Widespread Application of Non-animal Approaches? , 2015, PLoS biology.

[32]  S. Van Vlierberghe,et al.  Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting , 2016, Biofabrication.

[33]  Pamela Habibovic,et al.  High-throughput screening approaches and combinatorial development of biomaterials using microfluidics. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[34]  M Gelinsky,et al.  A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks , 2018, Biofabrication.

[35]  May Win Naing,et al.  Skin Bioprinting: Impending Reality or Fantasy? , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[36]  May Win Naing,et al.  Development of Polyelectrolyte Chitosan-gelatin Hydrogels for Skin Bioprinting☆ , 2016 .

[37]  D. Cho,et al.  3D Cell Printing of Perfusable Vascularized Human Skin Equivalent Composed of Epidermis, Dermis, and Hypodermis for Better Structural Recapitulation of Native Skin , 2018, Advanced healthcare materials.

[38]  May Win Naing,et al.  Applying macromolecular crowding to 3D bioprinting: fabrication of 3D hierarchical porous collagen-based hydrogel constructs. , 2018, Biomaterials science.

[39]  Q. Fang,et al.  Microfluidics for cell-based high throughput screening platforms - A review. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[40]  W. Yeong,et al.  Proof-of-concept: 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs , 2018, Biofabrication.

[41]  Wai Yee Yeong,et al.  Microvalve-based bioprinting - process, bio-inks and applications. , 2017, Biomaterials science.

[42]  May Win Naing,et al.  Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Based Bio-Ink Improves Cell Viability and Homogeneity during Drop-On-Demand Printing , 2017, Materials.

[43]  Léa J Pourchet,et al.  Human Skin 3D Bioprinting Using Scaffold‐Free Approach , 2017, Advanced healthcare materials.

[44]  W. Yeong,et al.  Healing of Chronic Wounds - An Update of Recent Developments and Future Possibilities. , 2019, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[45]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Layer-by-layer ultraviolet assisted extrusion-based (UAE) bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with high aspect ratio for soft tissue engineering applications , 2019, PloS one.

[46]  Wei Long Ng,et al.  Print Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet , 2019, Progress in Polymer Science.

[47]  Tao Xu,et al.  In Situ Bioprinting of Autologous Skin Cells Accelerates Wound Healing of Extensive Excisional Full-Thickness Wounds , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[48]  J. G. Hengstler,et al.  Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH) , 2008, Archives of Toxicology.

[49]  Ying Mei,et al.  Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[50]  May Win Naing,et al.  Microvalve bioprinting of cellular droplets with high resolution and consistency , 2016 .

[51]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration , 2002, Science.

[52]  L. Bergers,et al.  Progress and Future Prospectives in Skin-on-Chip Development with Emphasis on the use of Different Cell Types and Technical Challenges , 2017, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[53]  T. Hartung Toxicology for the twenty-first century , 2009, Nature.

[54]  I. Bae,et al.  Bioprinting of biomimetic skin containing melanocytes , 2018, Experimental dermatology.

[55]  Thomas Hartung A Toxicology for the 21st Century—Mapping the Road Ahead , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[56]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[57]  Deepak Choudhury,et al.  Microfluidic bioprinting for organ-on-a-chip models. , 2019, Drug discovery today.

[58]  Sandra Coecke,et al.  Automation of an in vitro cytotoxicity assay used to estimate starting doses in acute oral systemic toxicity tests. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[59]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Organs-on-a-Chip: A Fast Track for Engineered Human Tissues in Drug Development. , 2018, Cell stem cell.

[60]  Andreas Mark,et al.  Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks , 2018, Biofabrication.

[61]  Pankaj Karande,et al.  Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[62]  Shay Soker,et al.  3D bioprinting for high-throughput screening: Drug screening, disease modeling, and precision medicine applications. , 2019, Applied physics reviews.

[63]  Robert Zweigerdt,et al.  Laser bioprinting of human induced pluripotent stem cells—the effect of printing and biomaterials on cell survival, pluripotency, and differentiation , 2018, Biofabrication.

[64]  D. Ingber,et al.  From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.