An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics.

Inverse dynamics is a standard approach for estimating joint loadings in the lower extremity from kinematic and ground reaction data for use in clinical and research gait studies. Variability in estimating body segment parameters and uncertainty in defining anatomical landmarks have the potential to impact predicted joint loading. This study demonstrates the application of efficient probabilistic methods to quantify the effect of uncertainty in these parameters and landmarks on joint loading in an inverse-dynamics model, and identifies the relative importance of the parameters and landmarks to the predicted joint loading. The inverse-dynamics analysis used a benchmark data set of lower-extremity kinematics and ground reaction data during the stance phase of gait to predict the three-dimensional intersegmental forces and moments. The probabilistic analysis predicted the 1-99 percentile ranges of intersegmental forces and moments at the hip, knee, and ankle. Variabilities, in forces and moments of up to 56% and 156% of the mean values were predicted based on coefficients of variation less than 0.20 for the body segment parameters and standard deviations of 2 mm for the anatomical landmarks. Sensitivity factors identified the important parameters for the specific joint and component directions. Anatomical landmarks affected moments to a larger extent than body segment parameters. Additionally, for forces, anatomical landmarks had a larger effect than body segment parameters, with the exception of segment masses, which were important to the proximal-distal joint forces. The probabilistic modeling approach predicted the range of possible joint loading, which has implications in gait studies, clinical assessments, and implant design evaluations.

[1]  A Nagano,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of the calculation of mechanical output through inverse dynamics: a computer simulation study. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Effect of different inertial parameter sets on joint moment calculation during stair ascending and descending. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  D. Eckhoff,et al.  Variability of Landmark Identification in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: part II: lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[6]  Jeffrey A. Reinbolt,et al.  Are Patient-Specific Joint and Inertial Parameters Necessary for Accurate Inverse Dynamics Analyses of Gait? , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  E. Berton,et al.  Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  C. Powers,et al.  Determination of lower extremity anthropometric parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: the influence on net joint moments during gait. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Es Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: Application to the human knee joint. , 1983 .

[10]  J. D. de Groot,et al.  The variability of shoulder motions recorded by means of palpation. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Validation of a lower limb model with in vivo femoral forces telemetered from two subjects. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A Cappello,et al.  Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  A Cappozzo,et al.  Femoral anatomical frame: assessment of various definitions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Jurriaan H. de Groot The variability of shoulder motions recorded by means of palpation. , 1997 .

[18]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  S. Stanhope,et al.  The effect of variation in knee center location estimates on net knee joint moments. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[20]  Saara M S Totterman,et al.  The use of sequential MR image sets for determining tibiofemoral motion: reliability of coordinate systems and accuracy of motion tracking algorithm. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  T. Cruse,et al.  Advanced probabilistic structural analysis method for implicit performance functions , 1990 .

[22]  Saikat Pal,et al.  Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  P. Devita,et al.  Errors in alignment of center of pressure and foot coordinates affect predicted lower extremity torques. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.