Temporal tuning and attentional gating: Two distinct attentional mechanisms on the perception of rapid serial visual events

We examined the relationship between two different attention limitations on the perception of rapid events: the attentional awakening (AA, an inability to successfully process a target when it appears early on in a rapid stream of events) and the attentional blink (AB, an inability to successfully process a second target when it appears shortly after a first target [T1]). In four experiments, we failed to find a relationship between the magnitudes of these phenomena. Furthermore, we found two manipulations that selectively modulated the magnitude of each effect without altering the magnitude of the second effect: Expected range of possible rapid serial visual presentation lengths modulated the AA (but not the AB), suggesting that the AA reflects an attentional setup cost for perceiving a protracted series of rapid events, whereas the number of possible T1 positions in the stream modulated the magnitude of the AB (but not the magnitude of the AA). Our results suggest that, despite the surface similarities between the two phenomena, different mechanisms are responsible for these two attentional limitations: Whereas the AA reflects a starting cost associated with the time required to temporally tune attention to the stimulus stream, the AB reflects a blocking of undesired stimuli, aimed at protecting consolidation of T1 processing.

[1]  P. Jolicoeur.  Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  D H DRAZIN,et al.  Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  B. Wyble,et al.  The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[4]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Executive Control of Thought and Action , 2003 .

[5]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[6]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[8]  B. Rolke,et al.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Troy A W Visser,et al.  Masking T1 difficulty: processing time and the attenional blink. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[12]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  Dual-task interference and visual encoding , 1999 .

[13]  H. Pashler,et al.  Repetition Blindness: Perception or Memory Failure? , 1995 .

[14]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  The Time Course of Attention , 2007 .

[16]  J. Enns,et al.  The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? , 2005, Psychological research.

[17]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation , 1994 .

[18]  René Marois,et al.  Both exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink , 2010 .

[19]  M. Nieuwenstein,et al.  The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: sparing at a cost. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  P. Jolicoeur.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink , 1999 .

[24]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  An attentional blink for sequentially presented targets: Evidence in favor of resource depletion accounts , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  J. Duncan,et al.  Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  C. Olivers,et al.  A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. , 2008, Psychological review.

[29]  Christopher L Asplund,et al.  Both exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink: A reply to Olivers, Spalek, Kawahara, and Di Lollo (2009) , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Erik M Altmann,et al.  Advance Preparation in Task Switching , 2004, Psychological science.

[31]  R. Klein,et al.  The Attentional Blink is Immune to Masking-Induced Data Limits , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  J. Hulleman,et al.  Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink , 2007, Psychological research.

[33]  Bettina Rolke,et al.  Temporal preparation facilitates perceptual identification of letters , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  J. Duncan,et al.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  Attentional awakening: gradual modulation of temporal attention in rapid serial visual presentation , 2008, Psychological research.

[36]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Comparing switch costs: alternating runs and explicit cuing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Ralph Barnes,et al.  Expectancy, Attention, and Time , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  M. Potter,et al.  Temporal Limits of Selection and Memory Encoding , 2006, Psychological science.

[39]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  Isolation of a Central Bottleneck of Information Processing with Time-Resolved fMRI , 2006, Neuron.

[40]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Temporal preparation improves temporal resolution: Evidence from constant foreperiods , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.