SURVIVAL AND CONDITION OF BIG BROWN BATS (EPTESICUS FUSCUS) AFTER RADIOTAGGING

Abstract We tested the 5% rule for the ratio of radiotransmitter mass to body mass by applying radiotransmitters and passive integrated transponders (PIT tags) or PIT tags alone to adult, female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in buildings in Fort Collins, Colorado. We used records from PIT readers at roosts to compute apparent annual survival of both groups from 2001 to 2003 and found them to be similar. All bats examined 1 year after radiotagging were reproductively active and had body masses similar to bats not radiotagged. Big brown bats do not appear to suffer from major long-term effects of carrying transmitters within the 5% rule.

[1]  A. Kurta,et al.  Survival Rates of Myotis leibii and Eptesicus fuscus in Southeastern Ontario , 1984 .

[2]  J. Devos,et al.  Characteristics of Ponderosa Pine Snag Roosts Used by Reproductive Bats in Northern Arizona , 1998 .

[3]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses , 2001 .

[4]  T. O'Shea,et al.  ANESTHESIA AND BLOOD SAMPLING OF WILD BIG BROWN BATS (EPTESICUS FUSCUS) WITH AN ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ON SURVIVAL , 2005, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[5]  Douglas H. Johnson.  The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing , 1999 .

[6]  H. Aldridge,et al.  Load Carrying and Maneuverability in an Insectivorous Bat: a Test of the 5% “Rule” of Radio-Telemetry , 1988 .

[7]  A. Kurta,et al.  PHILOPATRY AND MIGRATION OF BANDED INDIANA BATS (MYOTIS SODALIS) AND EFFECTS OF RADIO TRANSMITTERS , 2002 .

[8]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[9]  M. P. Farrell,et al.  Population Dynamics of the Big Brown Bat (Eptesicus fuscus) in Southwestern Ohio , 1975 .

[10]  M. Hickey.  Effect of radiotransmitters on the attack success of hoary bats, Lasiurus cinereus , 1992 .

[11]  Gordon L. Kirkland,et al.  Guidelines for the Capture, Handling, and Care of Mammals as Approved by the American Society of Mammalogists , 1998 .

[12]  R. Brigham,et al.  Roosting Behavior and Roost-Site Preferences of Forest-Dwelling California Bats (Myotis californicus) , 1997 .

[13]  M. Bogan,et al.  Fitzgerald, J. P., C. A. Meaney, and D. M. Armstrong. 1994 [1995]. Mammals of Colorado. Denver Museum of Natural History and University Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado, xiii + 467 pp. ISBN 0-87081-333-1, price (cloth), $49.95 , 1996 .

[14]  M. Fenton.  Science and the Conservation of Bats , 1997 .

[15]  M. Fenton,et al.  The influence of roost closure on the roosting and foraging behaviour of Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) , 1986 .

[16]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative , 2000 .

[17]  T. O'Shea,et al.  Survival estimation in bats: historical overview, critical appraisal, and suggestions for new approaches , 2004 .

[18]  Donald F. Caccamise,et al.  An Aerodynamic Basis for Selecting Transmitter Loads in Birds , 1985 .

[19]  J. Hayes,et al.  A TECHNIQUE TO CAPTURE BATS USING HAND-HELD MIST NETS , 1999 .

[20]  M. Fenton.  Science and the conservation of bats: e to next? , 2003 .