Detection of antimicrobial producing Staphylococcus from migratory birds: Potential role in nasotracheal microbiota modulation

A collection of 259 staphylococci of 13 different species [212 coagulase-negative (CoNS) and 47 coagulase-positive (CoPS)] recovered from nasotracheal samples of 87 healthy nestling white storks was tested by the spot-on-lawn method for antimicrobial-activity (AA) against 14 indicator bacteria. Moreover, extracts of AP isolates were obtained [cell-free-supernatants (CFS) both crude and concentrated and butanol extracts] and tested against the 14 indicator bacteria. The microbiota modulation capacity of AP isolates was tested considering: (a) intra-sample AA, against all Gram-positive bacteria recovered in the same stork nasotracheal sample; (b) inter-sample AA against a selection of representative Gram-positive bacteria of the nasotracheal microbiota of all the storks (30 isolates of 29 different species and nine genera). In addition, enzymatic susceptibility test was carried out in selected AP isolates and bacteriocin encoding genes was studied by PCR/sequencing. In this respect, nine isolates (3.5%; seven CoNS and two CoPS) showed AA against at least one indicator bacteria and were considered antimicrobial-producing (AP) isolates. The AP isolates showed AA only for Gram-positive bacteria. Three of these AP isolates (S. hominis X3764, S. sciuri X4000, and S. chromogenes X4620) revealed AA on all extract conditions; other four AP isolates only showed activity in extracts after concentration; the remaining two AP isolates did not show AA in any of extract conditions. As for the microbiota modulation evaluation, three of the nine AP-isolates revealed intra-sample AA. It is to highlight the potent inter-sample AA of the X3764 isolate inhibiting 73% of the 29 representative Gram-positive species of the nasotracheal stork microbiota population. On the other hand, enzymatic analysis carried out in the two highest AP isolates (X3764 and X4000) verified the proteinaceous nature of the antimicrobial compound and PCR analysis revealed the presence of lantibiotic-like encoding genes in the nine AP isolates. In conclusion, these results show that nasotracheal staphylococci of healthy storks, and especially CoNS, produce antimicrobial substances that could be important in the modulations of their nasal microbiota.

[1]  Z. Gu,et al.  Shotgun metagenomic sequencing reveals skin microbial variability from different facial sites , 2022, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[2]  I. Abdullahi,et al.  Bacteriocin-Like Inhibitory Substances in Staphylococci of Different Origins and Species With Activity Against Relevant Pathogens , 2022, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[3]  I. Abdullahi,et al.  Wild Animals Are Reservoirs and Sentinels of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Clones: A Problem with “One Health” Concern , 2021, Antibiotics.

[4]  S. Heilbronner,et al.  The microbiome-shaping roles of bacteriocins , 2021, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  U. Höfle,et al.  Frequency and Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci from Wild Birds in Spain. Detection of tst-Carrying S. sciuri Isolates , 2020, Microorganisms.

[6]  F. Leroy,et al.  Exploring the Ambiguous Status of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci in the Biosafety of Fermented Meats: The Case of Antibacterial Activity Versus Biogenic Amine Formation , 2020, Microorganisms.

[7]  T. Nuttall,et al.  Staphylococcal-Produced Bacteriocins and Antimicrobial Peptides: Their Potential as Alternative Treatments for Staphylococcus aureus Infections , 2020, Antibiotics.

[8]  C. Torres,et al.  High diversity of coagulase negative staphylococci species in wild boars, with low antimicrobial resistance rates but detection of relevant resistance genes. , 2019, Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases.

[9]  A. Peschel,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus Colonization of the Human Nose and Interaction with Other Microbiome Members , 2019, Microbiology spectrum.

[10]  L. Comstock,et al.  Bacterial antagonism in host-associated microbial communities , 2018, Science.

[11]  C. Weidenmaier,et al.  The commensal lifestyle of Staphylococcus aureus and its interactions with the nasal microbiota , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[12]  E. Pamer,et al.  Microbiota-Based Therapies for Clostridium difficile and Antibiotic-Resistant Enteric Infections. , 2017, Annual review of microbiology.

[13]  Jian-Hua Liu,et al.  The role of wildlife (wild birds) in the global transmission of antimicrobial resistance genes , 2017, Zoological research.

[14]  G. Igrejas,et al.  Genetic Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance Among Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Recovered from Birds of Prey in Portugal. , 2016, Microbial drug resistance.

[15]  M. Holden,et al.  Genomic insights into the emergence and spread of international clones of healthcare-, community- and livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Blurring of the traditional definitions. , 2016, Journal of global antimicrobial resistance.

[16]  A. Peschel,et al.  High Frequency and Diversity of Antimicrobial Activities Produced by Nasal Staphylococcus Strains against Bacterial Competitors , 2016, PLoS pathogens.

[17]  M. Willmann,et al.  Human commensals producing a novel antibiotic impair pathogen colonization , 2016, Nature.

[18]  U. Höfle,et al.  Detection of MRSA ST3061-t843-mecC and ST398-t011-mecA in white stork nestlings exposed to human residues. , 2016, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[19]  R. Jáuregui,et al.  The microbial community structure of the cotton rat nose. , 2015, Environmental microbiology reports.

[20]  A. Pantosti,et al.  Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon , 2015, Pathogens and global health.

[21]  Kaare Christensen,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus and the ecology of the nasal microbiome , 2015, Science Advances.

[22]  Michael W. Taylor,et al.  The nasal microbiota in health and disease: variation within and between subjects , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[23]  Meghan F. Davis,et al.  The shared microbiota of humans and companion animals as evaluated from Staphylococcus carriage sites , 2015, Microbiome.

[24]  J. Järhult,et al.  Antibiotic resistance in wild birds , 2014, Upsala journal of medical sciences.

[25]  J. Weese,et al.  Evaluation of the nasal microbiota in slaughter-age pigs and the impact on nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage , 2014, BMC Veterinary Research.

[26]  Michael Lalk,et al.  Nutrient Limitation Governs Staphylococcus aureus Metabolism and Niche Adaptation in the Human Nose , 2014, PLoS pathogens.

[27]  Makedonka Mitreva,et al.  Exploration of bacterial community classes in major human habitats , 2014, Genome Biology.

[28]  D. Relman,et al.  Nasal microenvironments and interspecific interactions influence nasal microbiota complexity and S. aureus carriage. , 2013, Cell host & microbe.

[29]  G. Igrejas,et al.  Identification of bacteriocin genes in enterococci isolated from game animals and saltwater fish. , 2011, Journal of food protection.

[30]  Yoshimitsu Mizunoe,et al.  Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization , 2010, Nature.

[31]  D. Denning,et al.  The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) EUCAST Technical Note on fluconazole. , 2009 .

[32]  H. Sahl,et al.  Lantibiotics: mode of action, biosynthesis and bioengineering. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[33]  C. Torres,et al.  Detection of antimicrobial activities and bacteriocin structural genes in faecal enterococci of wild animals. , 2007, Microbiological research.

[34]  C. Torres,et al.  Bacteriocin production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from Rioja red wines , 2000, Journal of applied microbiology.

[35]  N. Geurkink Nasal anatomy, physiology, and function. , 1983, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.