Analysis of side-chain orientations in homologous proteins.

The side-chain conformations of topologically equivalent residues in seven pairs of proteins ranging in sequence homology from 16% to 60% are compared. Both identical and mutated residues are included. For proteins with greater than 40% homology, it is found that at least 80% of the side-chain orientations of identical residues and 75% or more of the mutated residues in each pair of proteins have matching gamma atom dihedral angles (+/- 40 degrees); the comparison is not based strictly on chi 1 angles. Further, if a match is obtained at the gamma position, there is a high probability of matching for the delta atom(s) of the side-chain. For proteins with less than 25% homology the percentages are somewhat lower. Trends observed for conservative substitutions are essentially the same as those noted for mutated residues in general. Side-chain accessibility does not affect the probability of matches of identical residues; however, less accessible pairs of mutated residues have 10 to 20% higher matching probabilities than do exposed residues. Mismatches can frequently be related to large B-factors, certain types of amino acid substitutions, or the appearance of multiple minima on the side-chain potential energy surfaces and are most likely to occur for certain small residues (Ser, Thr, Val). Analysis of all the results makes possible the formulation of a set of rules for side-chain positioning in the modeling of homologous proteins.

[1]  R J Read,et al.  Critical evaluation of comparative model building of Streptomyces griseus trypsin. , 1984, Biochemistry.

[2]  J. C. Kendrew,et al.  Structure and function of haemoglobin: II. Some relations between polypeptide chain configuration and amino acid sequence , 1965 .

[3]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of native and substrate-bound lysozyme. A study of the average structures and atomic fluctuations. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  A. M. Lesk,et al.  The response of protein structures to amino-acid sequence changes , 1986, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  R. S. Morgan,et al.  Predictor for sulfur-aromatic interactions in globular proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[6]  M Karplus,et al.  Construction of a model for the three-dimensional structure of human renal renin. , 1985, Hypertension.

[7]  M. Levitt,et al.  Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  P J Artymiuk,et al.  Refinement of human lysozyme at 1.5 A resolution analysis of non-bonded and hydrogen-bond interactions. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  P K Warme,et al.  Computation of structures of homologous proteins. Alpha-lactalbumin from lysozyme. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[10]  Michael J. Fischer,et al.  The String-to-String Correction Problem , 1974, JACM.

[11]  A. Lesk,et al.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[12]  S. Krimm,et al.  Vibrational analysis of peptides, polypeptides, and proteins. XVIII. Conformational sensitivity of the α‐helix spectrum: αI‐ and αII‐Poly(L‐alanine) , 1984 .

[13]  A. Lesk,et al.  Helix movements in proteins , 1985 .

[14]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  J. Greer Comparative model-building of the mammalian serine proteases. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Protein Structure and Function by Comparative Model Building , 1985 .

[17]  B. Furie,et al.  PART II. COMPUTER‐ASSISTED MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURE GENERATION: EXTENSION OF EXISTING INFORMATION: On the Construction of Computer Models of Proteins by the Extension of Crystallographic Structures , 1985, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  I. G. Kamphuis,et al.  Thiol proteases. Comparative studies based on the high-resolution structures of papain and actinidin, and on amino acid sequence information for cathepsins B and H, and stem bromelain. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  A. Shrake,et al.  Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[21]  G A Petsko,et al.  Fluctuations in protein structure from X-ray diffraction. , 1984, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[22]  W. Steigemann,et al.  Structure of erythrocruorin in different ligand states refined at 1.4 A resolution. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  A M Lesk,et al.  Helix movements and the reconstruction of the haem pocket during the evolution of the cytochrome c family. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  I. C. O. B. Nomenclature IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. Abbreviations and symbols for the description of the conformation of polypeptide chains. Tentative rules (1969). , 1970, Biochemistry.

[25]  M. James,et al.  Comparison of the predicted model of α-lytic protease with the X-ray structure , 1979, Nature.

[26]  M. James,et al.  Structure and refinement of penicillopepsin at 1.8 A resolution. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  P. K. Warme,et al.  Chains of alternating sulfur and pi-bonded atoms in eight small proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[28]  G. Cohen,et al.  Refined crystal structure of gamma-chymotrypsin at 1.9 A resolution. Comparison with other pancreatic serine proteases. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Experimental and theoretical aspects of protein folding. , 1975, Advances in protein chemistry.

[30]  P. Lindley,et al.  Sulphur‐aromatic interactions in proteins , 1985 .

[31]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  A. Lesk,et al.  How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  S. D. Dover,et al.  Refinement of bond angles of an α-helix , 1967 .

[34]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  Three-dimensional structure, specificity and catalytic mechanism of renin , 1983, Nature.

[35]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Structural aspects of thrombin specificity. , 1975, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[36]  C. Chothia The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  D. Phillips,et al.  A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine alpha-lactalbumin based on that of hen's egg-white lysozyme. , 1969, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  W. Turnell,et al.  Relaxin has conformational homology with insulin , 1977, Nature.

[39]  M Karplus,et al.  Side-chain torsional potentials: effect of dipeptide, protein, and solvent environment. , 1979, Biochemistry.

[40]  T. Takano,et al.  Structure of myoglobin refined at 2-0 A resolution. I. Crystallographic refinement of metmyoglobin from sperm whale. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.