Calibration of patient-specific boundary conditions for coupled CFD models of the aorta derived from 4D Flow-MRI

Introduction: Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models permit analysis of complex intra-aortic hemodynamics in patients with aortic dissection (AD), where vessel morphology and disease severity are highly individualized. The simulated blood flow regime within these models is sensitive to the prescribed boundary conditions (BCs), so accurate BC selection is fundamental to achieve clinically relevant results. Methods: This study presents a novel reduced-order computational framework for the iterative flow-based calibration of 3-Element Windkessel Model (3EWM) parameters to generate patient-specific BCs. These parameters were calibrated using time-resolved flow information derived from retrospective four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D Flow-MRI). For a healthy and dissected case, blood flow was then investigated numerically in a fully coupled zero dimensional-three dimensional (0D-3D) numerical framework, where the vessel geometries were reconstructed from medical images. Calibration of the 3EWM parameters was automated and required ~3.5 min per branch. Results: With prescription of the calibrated BCs, the computed near-wall hemodynamics (time-averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index) and perfusion distribution were consistent with clinical measurements and previous literature, yielding physiologically relevant results. BC calibration was particularly important in the AD case, where the complex flow regime was captured only after BC calibration. Discussion: This calibration methodology can therefore be applied in clinical cases where branch flow rates are known, for example, via 4D Flow-MRI or ultrasound, to generate patient-specific BCs for CFD models. It is then possible to elucidate, on a case-by-case basis, the highly individualized hemodynamics which occur due to geometric variations in aortic pathology high spatiotemporal resolution through CFD.

[1]  M. Bissell,et al.  The impact of 4D-Flow MRI spatial resolution on patient-specific CFD simulations of the thoracic aorta , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[2]  M. Markl,et al.  Enhanced 4D Flow MRI-Based CFD with Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Flow Dynamics Assessment in Coarctation of the Aorta , 2022, Annals of biomedical engineering.

[3]  Michael B. Scott,et al.  Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Evaluated by 4D Flow MRI Across the Adult Lifespan , 2022, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  S. Stoumpos,et al.  Patient-specific computational haemodynamics associated with the surgical creation of an arteriovenous fistula. , 2021, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  S. Celi,et al.  On the Role and Effects of Uncertainties in Cardiovascular in silico Analyses , 2021, Frontiers in Medical Technology.

[6]  S. Schievano,et al.  Characterization of Flow Dynamics in the Pulmonary Bifurcation of Patients With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Computational Approach , 2021, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[7]  H. Lamb,et al.  Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) as a potential gatekeeper for MRI-assessed PWV: a linear and deep neural network based approach in 2254 participants of the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study , 2021, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  A. Kazakidi,et al.  Hemodynamics in the Aorta and Pulmonary Arteries of Congenital Heart Disease Patients: A Mini Review , 2021, Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Sciences.

[9]  A. Kazakidi,et al.  Hemodynamic Abnormalities in the Aorta of Turner Syndrome Girls , 2021, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[10]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations , 2021, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[11]  M. Nakada,et al.  Inflow Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics and 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2021, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[12]  M. Kabir,et al.  Performance of k-ω and k-ε Model for Blood Flow Simulation in Stenosed Artery , 2021, GANIT: Journal of Bangladesh Mathematical Society.

[13]  T. Gourlay,et al.  Blood flow simulations in the pulmonary bifurcation in relation to adult patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. , 2020, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  M. Recio,et al.  Clinical use of 4D flow MRI for quantification of aortic regurgitation , 2020, Open Heart.

[15]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Expert recommendations on the assessment of wall shear stress in human coronary arteries: existing methodologies, technical considerations, and clinical applications , 2019, European heart journal.

[16]  Stavroula Balabani,et al.  Patient-specific haemodynamic simulations of complex aortic dissections informed by commonly available clinical datasets. , 2019, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  J. Westenberg,et al.  Quantification of aortic pulse wave velocity from a population based cohort: a fully automatic method , 2019, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  Lisheng Xu,et al.  A review on low-dimensional physics-based models of systemic arteries: application to estimation of central aortic pressure , 2019, Biomedical engineering online.

[19]  P. Swain,et al.  Impact of Cardiovascular Factors on Pulse Wave Velocity and Total Vascular Resistance in Different Age Group Patients with Cardiovascular Disorders , 2018, Current aging science.

[20]  S. Laurent,et al.  Interaction Between Hypertension and Arterial Stiffness: An Expert Reappraisal , 2018, Hypertension.

[21]  Alessandro Veneziani,et al.  Patient‐specific CFD modelling in the thoracic aorta with PC‐MRI–based boundary conditions: A least‐square three‐element Windkessel approach , 2018, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[22]  Stuart M Grieve,et al.  Normal patterns of thoracic aortic wall shear stress measured using four-dimensional flow MRI in a large population. , 2018, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[23]  N. Zhang,et al.  Quantitative Study of Abdominal Blood Flow Patterns in Patients with Aortic Dissection by 4-Dimensional Flow MRI , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[24]  E. Kemmerling,et al.  The effect of inlet and outlet boundary conditions in image-based CFD modeling of aortic flow , 2018, Biomedical engineering online.

[25]  A. Lefieux,et al.  Coupled Morphological–Hemodynamic Computational Analysis of Type B Aortic Dissection: A Longitudinal Study , 2018, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Shawn C Shadden,et al.  A Re-Engineered Software Interface and Workflow for the Open-Source SimVascular Cardiovascular Modeling Package. , 2018, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Alban Redheuil,et al.  Aortic Arch Pulse Wave Velocity Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Incident Cardiovascular Events: The MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) , 2017, Hypertension.

[28]  J. Pepper,et al.  On the choice of outlet boundary conditions for patient-specific analysis of aortic flow using computational fluid dynamics. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  I. Avrahami,et al.  Approaches for treatment of aortic arch aneurysm, a numerical study. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. Tarbell,et al.  Interaction between the Stress Phase Angle (SPA) and the Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI) Affects Endothelial Cell Gene Expression , 2016, PloS one.

[31]  M. Markl,et al.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics , 2016, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[32]  G. Wagner,et al.  Re: Blood flow analysis of the aortic arch using computational fluid dynamics. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[33]  Robert J. Beaulieu,et al.  Malperfusion syndromes in aortic dissections , 2016, Vascular medicine.

[34]  Seungik Baek,et al.  Computational fluid dynamic simulation of human carotid artery bifurcation based on anatomy and volumetric blood flow rate measured with magnetic resonance imaging , 2016, International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics.

[35]  Alejandro López,et al.  CFD study of Jet Impingement Test erosion using Ansys Fluent® and OpenFOAM® , 2015, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[36]  Matt A. Bernstein,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[37]  Stavroula Balabani,et al.  Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs. rigid wall models , 2015, Biomedical engineering online.

[38]  J. Cockcroft,et al.  Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. , 2014, European heart journal.

[39]  Bradley D. Allen,et al.  4D flow imaging with MRI. , 2014, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[40]  Stavroula Balabani,et al.  Development of a patient-specific simulation tool to analyse aortic dissections: assessment of mixed patient-specific flow and pressure boundary conditions. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[41]  J. Alastruey,et al.  A systematic comparison between 1‐D and 3‐D hemodynamics in compliant arterial models , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[42]  A. Evangelista,et al.  Role of entry tear size in type B aortic dissection. , 2014, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[43]  H. von Tengg-Kobligk,et al.  A patient-specific study of type-B aortic dissection: evaluation of true-false lumen blood exchange , 2013, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[44]  Yiannis Ventikos,et al.  A patient-specific study of type-B aortic dissection: evaluation of true-false lumen blood exchange , 2013, Biomedical engineering online.

[45]  Alison L. Marsden,et al.  A modular numerical method for implicit 0D/3D coupling in cardiovascular finite element simulations , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[46]  S. Sherwin,et al.  Does low and oscillatory wall shear stress correlate spatially with early atherosclerosis? A systematic review , 2013, Cardiovascular research.

[47]  Y. Qian,et al.  Numerical analysis of blood flow distribution in 4- and 3-branch vascular grafts , 2013, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[48]  David García-Dorado,et al.  An in vitro phantom study on the influence of tear size and configuration on the hemodynamics of the lumina in chronic type B aortic dissections. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[49]  M. Markl,et al.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D PC MRI blood flow quantification in children and young adults with congenital heart disease , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[50]  Spencer J. Sherwin,et al.  Arterial pulse wave haemodynamics , 2012 .

[51]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  Haemodynamics in the mouse aortic arch computed from MRI-derived velocities at the aortic root , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[52]  Werner Vach,et al.  Analysis of pulse wave velocity in the thoracic aorta by flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional MRI: Reproducibility and correlation with characteristics in patients with aortic atherosclerosis , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[53]  A. Wykrętowicz,et al.  Pulse pressure amplification in relation to body fatness. , 2012, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[54]  A Kazakidi,et al.  Effect of reverse flow on the pattern of wall shear stress near arterial branches , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[55]  Yubing Shi,et al.  Review of Zero-D and 1-D Models of Blood Flow in the Cardiovascular System , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[56]  Heow Pueh Lee,et al.  Investigation of hemodynamics in the development of dissecting aneurysm within patient-specific dissecting aneurismal aortas using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[57]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Accuracy of aortic pulse wave velocity assessment with velocity-encoded MRI: validation in patients with Marfan syndrome , 2011, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[58]  Michael Markl,et al.  Estimation of global aortic pulse wave velocity by flow‐sensitive 4D MRI , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[59]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Tuning Multidomain Hemodynamic Simulations to Match Physiological Measurements , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[60]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  On Coupling a Lumped Parameter Heart Model and a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Aorta Model , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[61]  Giancarlo Alfonsi,et al.  Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Equations for Turbulence Modeling , 2009 .

[62]  D. Birchall,et al.  Analysis of haemodynamic factors involved in carotid atherosclerosis using computational fluid dynamics. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[63]  G. Woodruff,et al.  BLOOD FLOW IN ARTERIES , 2009 .

[64]  A Kazakidi,et al.  Effect of Reynolds number and flow division on patterns of haemodynamic wall shear stress near branch points in the descending thoracic aorta , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[65]  Berend E. Westerhof,et al.  The arterial Windkessel , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[66]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Outflow Boundary Conditions for Arterial Networks with Multiple Outlets , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[67]  George S. K. Fung,et al.  On stent-graft models in thoracic aortic endovascular repair: A computational investigation of the hemodynamic factors , 2008, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[68]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries , 2006 .

[69]  Jordi Alastruey Arimon,et al.  Numerical modelling of pulse wave propagation in the cardiovascular system : development, validation and clinical applications , 2006 .

[70]  Xinwei Song,et al.  Studies of turbulence models in a computational fluid dynamics model of a blood pump. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[71]  A. Barakat,et al.  Unsteady and three-dimensional simulation of blood flow in the human aortic arch. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[72]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[73]  T. Wonnacott,et al.  Relation between diameter and flow in major branches of the arch of the aorta. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.