A Dynamic State-Space Model of Coded Political Texts

This article presents a new method of reconstructing actors' political positions from coded political texts. It is based on a model that combines a dynamic perspective on actors' political positions with a probabilistic account of how these positions are translated into emphases of policy topics in political texts. In the article it is shown how model parameters can be estimated based on a maximum marginal likelihood principle and how political actors' positions can be reconstructed using empirical Bayes techniques. For this purpose, a Monte Carlo Expectation Maximization algorithm is used that employs independent sample techniques with automatic Monte Carlo sample size adjustment. An example application is given by estimating a model of an economic policy space and a noneconomic policy space based on the data from the Comparative Manifesto Project. Parties' positions in policy spaces reconstructed using these models are made publicly available for download.

[1]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[2]  M. Laver.  Position and salience in the policies of political actors , 2001 .

[3]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2000, Technometrics.

[4]  J. Booth,et al.  Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm , 1999 .

[5]  Sven-Oliver Proksch,et al.  A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts , 2007 .

[6]  Anthony F. Heath,et al.  5 The Secret Life of Class Voting: Britain, France, and the United States Since the 1930s , 1999 .

[7]  Craig B. Borkowf,et al.  Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods , 2000, Technometrics.

[8]  Ian Budge,et al.  Party competition : selective emphasis or direct confrontation? : an alternative view with data , 1983 .

[9]  I. Budge,et al.  Ideology, strategy and party change : spatial analyses of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies , 1987 .

[10]  A. Alesina.  Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters , 1988 .

[11]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[12]  Slava J. Mikhaylov,et al.  Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts , 2011 .

[13]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data: Little/Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 2002 .

[14]  Dirk Eddelbuettel,et al.  Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration , 2011 .

[15]  S. Merrill,et al.  Policy-Seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation: A Valence-Uncertainty Model , 2009, British Journal of Political Science.

[16]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Stochastic Simulation , 2005 .

[17]  K. T. Poole,et al.  A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis , 1985 .

[18]  Melvin J. Hinich,et al.  Ideology and the theory of political choice , 1994 .

[19]  Joshua D. Clinton,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[21]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[22]  Melvin J. Hinich,et al.  Advances in the spatial theory of voting , 1990 .

[23]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  Party Policy in Modern Democracies , 2006 .

[24]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[25]  S. Fielding.  The Labour Party: Continuity and Change in the Making of 'New' Labour , 2002 .

[26]  Anthony F. Heath.  Understanding Political Change: The British Voter 1964-1987 , 1991 .

[27]  Galin L. Jones,et al.  Ascent‐based Monte Carlo expectation– maximization , 2005 .

[28]  R. McKelvey.  General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models , 1979 .

[29]  James M. Enelow,et al.  The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction , 1984 .

[30]  Melvin J. Hinich,et al.  Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting , 1993 .

[31]  John H. Miller,et al.  Adaptive Parties in Spatial Elections , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos , 2012, Political Analysis.

[33]  M. Laver,et al.  Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[34]  Andrew D. Martin,et al.  Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 , 2002, Political Analysis.

[35]  L. Ezrow.  The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[36]  G. C. Wei,et al.  A Monte Carlo Implementation of the EM Algorithm and the Poor Man's Data Augmentation Algorithms , 1990 .

[37]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Political Parties and Electoral Landscapes , 1993, British Journal of Political Science.

[38]  H. Somsen.  The European Union and the OECD , 1996 .

[39]  Hans-Dieter Klingemann,et al.  Mapping policy preferences II : estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003 , 2006 .

[40]  I. Budge,et al.  Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998 , 2001 .

[41]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[42]  M. Laver,et al.  Estimating policy positions from political texts , 2000 .

[43]  D. Stegmueller,et al.  Apples and Oranges? The Problem of Equivalence in Comparative Research , 2011, Political Analysis.

[44]  S. Fielding.  The Labour Party , 2003 .

[45]  Martin Elff.  Social divisions, party positions, and electoral behaviour , 2009 .

[46]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions , 2009 .