On Automatic Bioacoustic Detection of Pests: The Cases of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus and Sitophilus oryzae

ABSTRACT The present work reports research efforts toward development and evaluation of a unified framework for automatic bioacoustic recognition of specific insect pests. Our approach is based on capturing and automatically recognizing the acoustic emission resulting from typical behaviors, e.g., locomotion and feeding, of the target pests. After acquisition the signals are amplified, filtered, parameterized, and classified by advanced machine learning methods on a portable computer. Specifically, we investigate an advanced signal parameterization scheme that relies on variable size signal segmentation. The feature vector computed for each segment of the signal is composed of the dominant harmonic, which carry information about the periodicity of the signal, and the cepstral coefficients, which carry information about the relative distribution of energy among the different spectral sub-bands. This parameterization offers a reliable representation of both the acoustic emissions of the pests of interest and the interferences from the environment. We illustrate the practical significance of our methodology on two specific cases: 1) a devastating pest for palm plantations, namely, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier and 2) a pest that attacks warehouse stored rice (Oryza sativa L.), the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (both Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Dryophorinae). These pests are known in many countries around the world and contribute for significant economical loss. The proposed approach led to detection results in real field trials, reaching 99.1% on real-field recordings of R. ferrugineus and 100% for S. oryzae.

[2]  Symposium on Agroacoustics: Using Insect Sounds to Estimate and Monitor Their Populations , 1988 .

[3]  R. W. Mankin,et al.  Quantitative Acoustical Detection of Larvae Feeding Inside Kernels of Grain , 1993 .

[4]  T. Ganchev,et al.  AUTOMATIC ACOUSTIC IDENTIFICATION OF SINGING INSECTS , 2007 .

[5]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models , 1995, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[6]  M. O'Neill,et al.  Automated species identification: why not? , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  K. Riede Acoustic monitoring of Orthoptera and its potential for conservation , 1998, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[8]  Lloyd A. Smith,et al.  Practical feature subset selection for machine learning , 1998 .

[9]  R. Mankin,et al.  Acoustic Detection of Termite Infestations in Urban Trees , 2002, Journal of economic entomology.

[10]  R. W. Mankin,et al.  Acoustic Counting of Adult Insects with Differing Rates and Intensities of Sound Production in Stored Wheat , 1997 .

[11]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[12]  R. Mankin,et al.  Detection of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Larvae in Different Host Trees and Tissues by Automated Analyses of Sound-Impulse Frequency and Temporal Patterns , 2008, Journal of economic entomology.

[13]  E. D. Chesmore,et al.  Automated identification of field-recorded songs of four British grasshoppers using bioacoustic signal recognition , 2004, Bulletin of Entomological Research.