On the forwarding area of contention-based geographic forwarding for ad hoc and sensor networks

Contention-based Geographic Forwarding (CGF) is a state-free communication paradigm for information delivery in multihop ad hoc and sensor networks. Ap rioriselection of the forwarding area impacts its overall network performance and the design of the CGF protocol as well. In this work, we study the fundamental problem of defining the forwarding area ap riorifor CGF and determine its impact on the performance. We model CGF without void (i.e., absence of a next-hop node in the forwarding area) handling as a 3-step forwarding strategy. Based on this model and given a random distribution of network nodes, we develop a general mathematical analysis technique to evaluate the performance of CGF with different forwarding areas, in terms of the performance metric average single-hop packet progress. Further, we introduce two state-free void handling schemes, i.e., active exploration and passive participation, for CGF and study their performance in depth. Our theoretical analysis and numerically evaluated results, validated by extensive simulations, provide a guideline regarding the selection of specific forwarding areas for the design of a practical CGF protocol. It also serves as a general performance evaluation framework for the existing CGF protocols.

[1]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Locating and bypassing routing holes in sensor networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[2]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[3]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Dynamic fine-grained localization in Ad-Hoc networks of sensors , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[4]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[5]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Optimal local topology knowledge for energy efficient geographical routing in sensor networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[6]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Multihop Performance , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[7]  Yunghsiang Sam Han,et al.  Optimum transmission range for wireless ad hoc networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[8]  Sang Hyuk Son,et al.  IGF: A robust state-free communication protocol for sensor networks , 2003 .

[9]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[10]  H. Hartenstein,et al.  Contention-based forwarding for street scenarios , 2004 .

[11]  J. L. Gao,et al.  Analysis of Energy Consumption for Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks Using a Bit-Meter-per-Joule Metric , 2002 .

[12]  Brad Karp,et al.  Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks , 2000 .

[13]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  A state-free data delivery protocol for multihop wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.

[14]  Jörg Widmer,et al.  Contention-based forwarding for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[15]  David R. Karger,et al.  A scalable location service for geographic ad hoc routing , 2000, MobiCom '00.