Location privacy preservation in collaborative spectrum sensing

Collaborative spectrum sensing has been regarded as a promising approach to enable secondary users to detect primary users by exploiting spatial diversity. In this paper, we consider a converse question: could space diversity be exploited by a malicious entity, e.g., an external attacker or an untrusted Fusion Center (FC), to achieve involuntary geolocation of a secondary user by linking his location-dependent sensing report to his physical position. We answer this question by identifying a new security threat in collaborative sensing from testbed implementation, and it is shown that the attackers could geo-locate a secondary user from its sensing report with a successful rate of above 90% even in the presence of data aggregation. We then introduce a novel location privacy definition to quantify the location privacy leaking in collaborative sensing. We propose a Privacy Preserving collaborative Spectrum Sensing (PPSS) scheme, which includes two primitive protocols: Privacy Preserving Sensing Report Aggregation protocol (PPSRA) and Distributed Dummy Report Injection Protocol (DDRI). Specifically, PPSRA scheme utilizes applied cryptographic techniques to allow the FC to obtain the aggregated result from various secondary users without learning each individual's values while DDRI algorithm can provide differential location privacy for secondary users by introducing a novel sensing data randomization technique. We implement and evaluate the PPSS scheme in a real-world testbed. The evaluation results show that PPSS can significantly improve the secondary user's location privacy with a reasonable security overhead in collaborative sensing.

[1]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  Using Classification to Protect the Integrity of Spectrum Measurements in White Space Networks , 2011, NDSS.

[2]  Rui Zhang,et al.  PriSense: Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation in People-Centric Urban Sensing Systems , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[3]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[4]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Differential Privacy , 2006, ICALP.

[5]  Zhu Han,et al.  Catch Me if You Can: An Abnormality Detection Approach for Collaborative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Xue Liu,et al.  PDA: Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[7]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  White space networking with wi-fi like connectivity , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[8]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Achieving cooperative spectrum sensing in wireless cognitive radio networks , 2009, MOCO.

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Elaine Shi,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Aggregation of Time-Series Data , 2011, NDSS.

[11]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[12]  Steven Myers,et al.  Mobile location tracking in metro areas: malnets and others , 2010, CCS '10.

[13]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  Secure Cooperative Sensing in IEEE 802.22 WRANs Using Shadow Fading Correlation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Evolutionary cooperative spectrum sensing game: how to collaborate? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  Ting Wang,et al.  Location privacy protection from RSS localization system using antenna pattern synthesis , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[16]  Shuai Li,et al.  Believe Yourself: A User-Centric Misbehavior Detection Scheme for Secure Collaborative Spectrum Sensing , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[17]  Pengcheng Wang,et al.  Automatic inference of movements from contact histories , 2011, SIGCOMM 2011.

[18]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  SMART: A Secure Multilayer Credit-Based Incentive Scheme for Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.