Myoelectric pattern recognition using dynamic motions with limb position changes

Myoelectric pattern recognition discriminates myoelectric signal patterns to recognize human gestures because myoelectric signal exhibits muscular activities of human motions. This technique has been broadly researched for prosthetic devices and human computer interface. However, it still has robustness issues caused by various conditions: limb position changes, long-term uses, electrode shifts, and skin condition changes. These issues have compromised the reliability of pattern recognition technique in myoelectric systems. In order to increase the reliability in the limb position effect, this paper develops a myoelectric system using dynamic motions. For the classification of dynamic motions, dynamic time warping technique was used for the alignment of two different time-length motions and correlation coefficient was then calculated as a similarity metric. For comparison purposes, static motions were classified by Naïve Bayesian classifier for the classification and Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis for the dimensionality reduction. Static and dynamic motions were collected at four different limb positions for estimating the robustness to the limb position effect. The statistical analysis, t-test (p<;0.05), showed that dynamic motions were more robust to the limb position effect than static motions from all eight subjects when training and validation sets were extracted from different limb positions. Subject 5 showed the best classification accuracy: 97.59% with 3.54% standard deviation (SD) for dynamic motions and 71.85% with 12.62% SD for static motions when training and validation sets were picked from different limb positions.

[1]  K. Englehart,et al.  Resolving the Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Pattern Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effects of Electrode Size and Orientation on the Sensitivity of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Systems to Electrode Shift , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Marco Pirini,et al.  The ABC of EMG , 2014 .

[4]  Daniel W. Stashuk,et al.  Multifunction myoelectric control using multi-dimensional dynamic time warping , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Lu Wang,et al.  Study on fatigue feature from forearm SEMG signal based on wavelet analysis , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[6]  Jaime Valls Miró,et al.  Towards limb position invariant myoelectric pattern recognition using time-dependent spectral features , 2014, Neural Networks.

[7]  Dario Farina,et al.  Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  E L Morin,et al.  Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Reza Langari,et al.  A Performance Comparison of EMG Classification Methods for Hand and Finger Motion , 2014 .

[11]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Xinjun Sheng,et al.  Effects of Long-Term Myoelectric Signals on Pattern Recognition , 2013, ICIRA.

[13]  Joseph B. Kruskall,et al.  The Symmetric Time-Warping Problem : From Continuous to Discrete , 1983 .

[14]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs¿Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[15]  S. Mitra,et al.  Gesture Recognition: A Survey , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[16]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Towards better understanding and reducing the effect of limb position on myoelectric upper-limb prostheses , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  Yael Edan,et al.  Vision-based hand-gesture applications , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  Long term stability of surface EMG pattern classification for prosthetic control , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[19]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Teager–Kaiser Energy Operation of Surface EMG Improves Muscle Activity Onset Detection , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Ta-Te Lin,et al.  A comparison of upper-limb motion pattern recognition using EMG signals during dynamic and isometric muscle contractions , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[21]  Angkoon Phinyomark,et al.  EMG feature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  A.D.C. Chan,et al.  Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.