Comparison of different solar plants based on parabolic trough technology

Abstract Solar thermal plants are among the most promising technologies to replace fossil fuel stationary applications, and within solar thermal technologies, parabolic troughs are considered the most mature application in the market. This paper compares different solar field technologies, in terms of both performance at design conditions and annual energy production; an in-house code, PATTO, was used to perform energy balances. We considered a reference case reflecting state-of-the-art Nevada Solar One, which showed a design efficiency and annual average efficiency of 22.4% and 15.3%, respectively, in agreement with actual performance. If solar salts are used as heat-transfer fluid instead of synthetic oil (e.g. ARCHIMEDE plant), the efficiency improved within the range of 6% due to the higher maximum temperature. Further thermodynamic advantages can be achieved with a direct steam generation plant; the main drawback is the more complex transient control and no commercially available storage systems. We propose the innovative Milan configuration, which combines advantages of direct steam evaporation and the use of a heat-transfer fluid, to investigate both synthetic oil and solar salts for steam superheating and reheating. Results for this configuration are very promising, with a sun-to-electric annual average efficiency of 17.8%, which is 16% higher than the reference case. Detailed daily simulations showed that advantages are more significant at low radiation. However, the plant should be optimized on an economic basis and we will discuss this in a future paper.

[1]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Steam temperature stability in a direct steam generation solar power plant , 2011 .

[2]  C. Kennedy.  Review of Mid- to High-Temperature Solar Selective Absorber Materials , 2002 .

[3]  D. Mills.  Advances in solar thermal electricity technology , 2004 .

[4]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  Final Report on the Operation and Maintenance Improvement Program for Concentrating Solar Power Plants , 1999 .

[5]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough vs Fresnel , 2011 .

[6]  Eckhard Lüpfert,et al.  Parabolic Trough Power Plants , 2012 .

[7]  Yehuda Taitel,et al.  A control procedure for the elimination of mal flow rate distribution in evaporating flow in parallel pipes , 2008 .

[8]  M. J. Montes,et al.  Performance of a direct steam generation solar thermal power plant for electricity production as a function of the solar multiple , 2009 .

[9]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Development of an Innovative Code for the Design of Different Parabolic Trough Solar Fields , 2009 .

[10]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[11]  K R Williams,et al.  Power from the sun , 1979 .

[12]  W. Beckman,et al.  SOLAR ENGINEERING OF THERMAL PROCESSES Second Edition , 2009 .

[13]  T. Stuetzle,et al.  Automatic control of a 30 MWe SEGS VI parabolic trough plant , 2004 .

[14]  A. Patnode.  Simulation and Performance Evaluation of Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plants , 2006 .

[15]  R. Forristall,et al.  Heat Transfer Analysis and Modeling of a Parabolic Trough Solar Receiver Implemented in Engineering Equation Solver , 2003 .

[16]  Montes Pita,et al.  Análisis y propuestas de sistemas solares de alta exergía que emplean agua como fluido calorífero , 2011 .

[17]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 1981 .

[18]  E. Zarza,et al.  INDITEP: The first pre-commercial DSG solar power plant , 2006 .

[19]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Technical and economical analysis of a solar–geothermal hybrid plant based on an Organic Rankine Cycle , 2011 .

[20]  Fletcher Miller,et al.  Thermodynamic Cycles for a Small Particle Heat Exchange Receiver Used in Concentrating Solar Power Plants , 2011 .

[21]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel , 2013 .

[22]  N. Siegel,et al.  MOLTEN NITRATE SALT DEVELOPMENT FOR THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE IN PARABOLIC TROUGH SOLAR POWER SYSTEMS , 2008 .

[23]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Solar Trough Integration Into Combined Cycle Systems , 2002 .

[24]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Development of an innovative code for the design of thermodynamic solar power plants part A: Code description and test case , 2011 .

[25]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  A numerical model for off-design performance prediction of parabolic trough based solar power plants , 2012 .

[26]  José María Martínez-Val Peñalosa,et al.  Performance of a direct steam generation solar thermal power plant for electricity production as a function of the solar multiple , 2009 .

[27]  Markus Eck,et al.  Field Test of Water-Steam Separators for Direct Steam Generation in Parabolic Troughs , 2008 .

[28]  Eduardo Zarza,et al.  Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications , 2010 .

[29]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Development of an innovative code for the design of thermodynamic solar power plants part B: Performance assessment of commercial and innovative technologies , 2011 .