Scaling Academic Writing Instruction: Evaluation of a Scaffolding Tool (Thesis Writer)
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Thaiss,et al. Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life , 2006 .
[2] Tiago Oliveira,et al. Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level , 2011 .
[3] Mary Lea,et al. Working With Academic Literacies: Case Studies Towards Transformative Practice , 2016 .
[4] Mary Deane,et al. Writing in the Disciplines , 1987 .
[5] H. Cooper,et al. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students' academic learning , 2014 .
[6] Icek Ajzen,et al. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .
[7] A. Wilkinson,et al. The Development of Writing , 1980 .
[8] V. Bhatia. Critical reflections on genre analysis , 2012 .
[9] David Russell,et al. Writing in the academic disciplines : a curricular history , 2002 .
[10] Etienne Wenger,et al. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .
[11] Hayes. identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .
[12] Mya Poe,et al. Learning to Communicate in Science and Engineering: Case Studies from MIT , 2010 .
[13] J. Hayes. Modeling and Remodeling Writing , 2012 .
[14] Andy P. Field,et al. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .
[15] John R. Hayes,et al. Planning in writing: The cogniton of a constructive process , 1992 .
[16] Tai-Kuei Yu,et al. Modelling the factors that affect individuals' utilisation of online learning systems: An empirical study combining the task technology fit model with the theory of planned behaviour , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[17] Mun Y. Yi,et al. Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[18] John W. Creswell,et al. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .
[19] Mark Torrance,et al. Learning to write effectively : Current trends in European research , 2012 .
[20] M. Scardamalia,et al. The psychology of written composition , 1987 .
[21] Julie Coiro,et al. Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research , 2008 .
[22] John C. Bean,et al. Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom , 2011 .
[23] O. Kruse. Wissenschaftliches Schreiben forschungsorientiert unterrichten , 2016 .
[24] Charles A. MacArthur,et al. Handbook of Writing Research , 2005 .
[25] Christian Rapp,et al. Thesis Writer: A System for Supporting Academic Writing , 2015, CSCW Companion.
[26] U. Flick,et al. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis , 2013 .
[27] N. Ivankova,et al. Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field , 2015 .
[28] L. Gregg,et al. Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes , 2016 .
[29] S. Graham,et al. A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. , 2007 .
[30] Laura K. Allen,et al. The Writing Pal Intelligent Tutoring System: Usability Testing and Development , 2014 .
[31] Otto Kruse,et al. Exploring European Writing Cultures : Country Reports on Genres, Writing Practices and Languages Used in European Higher Education , 2016 .
[32] J. Hayes,et al. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.
[33] Johnny Saldaña,et al. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .
[34] Daniel Perrin,et al. Handbook of writing and text production , 2014 .
[35] S. Michaels,et al. A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures , 1996 .
[36] E. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .
[37] John C. Tang,et al. Unobtrusive but invasive: using screen recording to collect field data on computer-mediated interaction , 2006, CSCW '06.
[38] Linda S. Lotto. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .
[39] Dale Goodhue,et al. Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..
[40] Richard A. Krueger,et al. Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .
[41] Aek Phakiti,et al. The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing , 2014 .
[42] S. Scherer,et al. Wissenschaftliches Schreiben in Natur- und Technikwissenschaften , 2016 .
[43] Steven Pearlman,et al. Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life , 2008 .
[44] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[45] Ming Liu,et al. Automatic Generation and Ranking of Questions for Critical Review , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[46] O. Kruse,et al. Prozessorientierte Schreibdidaktik : Grundlagen und Arbeitsformen , 2014 .
[47] B. Walvoord,et al. Thinking and Writing in College: A Naturalistic Study of Students in Four Disciplines , 1991 .
[48] Christian Rapp,et al. Corpus-supported academic writing: how can technology help? , 2015 .
[49] Jane E. Klobas,et al. A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact , 2009, Comput. Educ..
[50] Thomas Kent,et al. Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm , 1999 .
[51] Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..
[52] Laura K. Allen,et al. Computer-Based Writing Instruction. , 2016 .
[53] Christian Rapp,et al. Thesis writer : supporting writing processes in real time using a web-based digital learning platform , 2015 .
[54] Ming Liu,et al. G-Asks: An Intelligent Automatic Question Generation System for Academic Writing Support , 2012, Dialogue Discourse.
[55] O. Kruse. Kritisches Denken als Leitziel der Lehre. Auswege aus der Verschulungsmisere , 2010 .
[56] J. Creswell. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .
[57] Linda Flower,et al. The Dynamics of Composing : Making Plans and Juggling Constraints , 1980 .
[58] Jill Burstein,et al. Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation Current Applications and New Directions , 2018 .
[59] Sung Youl Park,et al. An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[60] Gordon B. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..
[61] Janet Mancini Billson,et al. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .
[62] Reinholdine Breien-Pierson. The influence of brain hemisphericity on the composing process of twelfth graders , 1990 .
[63] Judith A. Langer,et al. How Writing Shapes Thinking: A Study of Teaching and Learning. NCTE Research Report No. 22. , 1987 .
[64] A. Huberman,et al. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .
[65] A. Freadman. The Traps and Trappings of Genre Theory , 2012 .
[66] R. T. Kellogg,et al. Improving the writing skills of college students , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[67] K. Hone,et al. Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments in developing countries:A structural equation modeling approach , 2013 .
[68] O. Kruse. Kritisches Denken im Zeichen Bolognas : Rhetorik und Realität , 2010 .
[69] Otto Kruse. Perspectives on Academic Writing in European Higher Education: Genres, Practices, and Competences Perspectivas sobre la escritura acadÈmica en la educaciÛn superior europea: GÈneros, pr·cticas y competencias , 2013 .