Prediction of the Seismic Response of Steel Frames with Concentric Diagonal Bracings

Concentrically braced frames and eccentrically braced frames are efficient seismic resistant systems but they are generally prone to develop storey collapse mechanisms. As underlined in some previous papers with regard to eccen- trically braced frames, this tendency depends on the overstrength factors and damage distribution capacity factors result- ing from the use of common design procedures. In this paper a previously proposed procedure which predicts the height- wise distribution of the damage at collapse of eccentrically braced frames is applied to concentrically braced frames. To apply this procedure, proper definitions of the overstrength factors and damage distribution capacity factors are derived. The effectiveness of the proposed procedure is tested on frames with concentric diagonal bracings characterised by differ- ent storey numbers and designed by common design procedures. The target response is provided by nonlinear dynamic analyses. The seismic input is constituted by ten artificial accelerograms. The paper proves that the proposed procedure is able to predict accurately the nonlinear dynamic response of systems in which the damage is mainly restricted to a few storeys. In the other cases, some not negligible scattering between actual and expected values of damage can be found at some storeys.

[1]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Influence of the link overstrength factor on the seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced frames , 2007 .

[2]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Inelastic Cyclic Buckling and Fracture of Steel Braces , 2009 .

[3]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Making use of brace overstrength to improve the seismic response of multistorey split-X concentrically braced steel frames , 2006 .

[4]  R. Landolfo,et al.  Modelling aspects of the seismic response of steel concentric braced frames , 2013 .

[5]  Aurelio Ghersi,et al.  Comparison of nonlinear static methods for the assessment of asymmetric buildings , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[6]  M. De Stefano,et al.  Effect of the variability in plan of concrete mechanical properties on the seismic response of existing RC framed structures , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[7]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Ultimate behavior of steel beams under non-uniform bending , 2012 .

[8]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system , 2006 .

[9]  E. Marino,et al.  Exact evaluation of the location of the optimum torsion axis , 2004 .

[10]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Influence of the brace overstrength on the seismic behavior of chevron braced frames , 2009 .

[11]  Gary C. Hart,et al.  The structural design of tall and special buildings , 2005 .

[12]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  A design procedure for dual eccentrically braced systems: Analytical formulation , 2013 .

[13]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  An accurate strength amplification factor for the design of SDOF systems with P–Δ effects , 2014 .

[14]  Aurelio Ghersi,et al.  On the evaluation of seismic response of structures by nonlinear static methods , 2009 .

[16]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members , 2002 .

[17]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Experimental analysis of steel dissipative bracing systems for seismic upgrading , 2009 .

[18]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[19]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Model for Cyclic Inelastic Buckling of Steel Braces , 2008 .

[20]  Taijiro Nonaka,et al.  An elastic-plastic analysis of a bar under repeated axial loading , 1973 .

[21]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  An analytical method for the evaluation of the in-plan irregularity of non-regularly asymmetric buildings , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[22]  Douglas A. Foutch,et al.  Seismic Testing of Full‐Scale Steel Building—Part II , 1987 .

[23]  Brad Shaback,et al.  Behaviour of square hollow structural steel braces with end connections under reversed cyclic axial loading , 2003 .

[24]  Murat Dicleli,et al.  Physical Theory Hysteretic Model for Steel Braces , 2008 .

[25]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames , 2009 .

[26]  Giuseppe Brandonisio,et al.  Seismic design of concentric braced frames , 2012 .

[27]  P. C. Jennings,et al.  Simulated earthquake motions , 1968 .

[28]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic behavior and design of friction concentrically braced frames for steel buildings , 1993 .

[29]  Tao Wang,et al.  Collapse simulation of a four‐story steel moment frame by a distributed online hybrid test , 2008 .

[30]  Triantafyllos Makarios,et al.  Earthquake analysis of isotropic asymmetric multistory buildings , 2006 .

[31]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  A unitary approach for the design of concentrically braced frames , 2011 .

[32]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  A design procedure for dual eccentrically braced systems: Numerical investigation , 2013 .

[33]  Zila Rinaldi,et al.  Static vs. Modal Analysis of Asymmetric Buildings: Effectiveness of Dynamic Eccentricity Formulations , 2002 .

[34]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  A novel formulation of the flexural overstrength factor for steel beams , 2013 .

[35]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  A design procedure for tied braced frames , 2007 .

[36]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Influence of gusset plate connections and braces on the seismic performance of X‐braced frames , 2011 .

[37]  Melina Bosco,et al.  Design method and behavior factor for steel frames with buckling restrained braces , 2013 .

[38]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Comparison of European and Japanese seismic design of steel building structures , 2005 .

[39]  Edoardo M. Marino A unified approach for the design of high ductility steel frames with concentric braces in the framework of Eurocode 8 , 2014 .

[40]  Gao Jie Seismic Behaviour of Three New Connections Used for Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames , 2009 .

[41]  Aurelio Ghersi,et al.  Corrective eccentricities for assessment by the nonlinear static method of 3D structures subjected to bidirectional ground motions , 2012 .

[42]  日本建築学会 Design standard for steel structures , 1979 .

[43]  Douglas A. Foutch,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Eccentrically Braced Steel Building , 1989 .

[44]  Larry Alan Fahnestock,et al.  Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength , 2011 .

[45]  R Tremblay Achieving a Stable Inelastic Seismic Stability of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames , 2003 .

[46]  Monica Bosco,et al.  Seismic response of dual eccentrically braced systems designed by Eurocode 8 , 2012 .

[47]  Xie Qiang Seismic Behavior of Dual System with Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2008 .

[48]  Stavros A. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Accidental design eccentricity: Is it important for the inelastic response of buildings to strong earthquakes? , 2010 .

[49]  Andrea Dall'Asta,et al.  Sensitivity-based study of the influence of brace over-strength distributions on the seismic response of steel frames with BRBs , 2012 .

[50]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Proposal of modifications to the design provisions of Eurocode 8 for buildings with split K eccentric braces , 2014 .

[51]  Stavros A. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  An answer to an important controversy and the need for caution when using simple models to predict inelastic earthquake response of buildings with torsion , 2009 .

[52]  Yoshihiro Kimura,et al.  Effect of Column Stiffness on Braced Frame Seismic Behavior , 2004 .

[53]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced frames , 2009 .

[54]  Edoardo M. Marino,et al.  Seismic performance and new design procedure for chevron-braced frames , 2006 .