Preventing perseveration in language production

This paper investigates the effect of the repetition of phonological elements on accuracy in spontaneous language production. Using a corpus of naturalistic speech errors, it is shown that repetition of a whole segment doubles the error rate on the second token (a perseveratory effect), for onset consonants, vowels, and coda consonants; the effect is present (at a reduced magnitude) in the speech of young children. Repetition also leads to an increased error rate on the first token (an anticipatory effect), but only for word-initial consonants and only for adults. Repetition of subsegmental features has an effect only for word-initial consonants and only perseveratorily. There are no effects of repetition of larger units (e.g., syllable onsets) or for general segmental similarity. It is argued that the effect is largely due to mechanisms designed to prevent perseveration (by e.g., shifting average activation values downward), and affects early-accessed information (whole segments; onset consonants) more than later-accessed information (subsegmental features; vowels and coda consonants).

[1]  A. Meyer.  The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[2]  A. Cutler.  The reliability of speech error data , 1981 .

[3]  Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al.  Speech errors in early child language production , 1989 .

[4]  G. Marcus.  The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science , 2001 .

[5]  A. I. Moskowitz.  The Two-Year-Old Stage in the Acquisition of English Phonology. , 1970 .

[6]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  Ann Stuart Laubstein,et al.  Syllable Structure: The Speech Error Evidence , 1987, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[8]  Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al.  The tongue slips into patterns , 1969 .

[9]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[10]  D. Mackay.  The Organization of Perception and Action , 1987 .

[11]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Structure and Content in Language Production: A Theory of Frame Constraints in Phonological Speech Errors , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Sublexical Units and Suprasegmental Structure in Speech Production Planning , 1983 .

[13]  R. Treiman,et al.  The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters☆ , 1986 .

[14]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[15]  Michael Hammond,et al.  The phonology of English : a prosodic optimality-theoretic approach , 1999 .

[16]  Thomas Berg,et al.  Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivationsflußmodell: Untersuchungen an deutschen und englischen Versprechern , 1988 .

[17]  J. Stemberger.  Wordshape errors in language production , 1990, Cognition.

[18]  Marianne Pouplier,et al.  Tongue Kinematics during Utterances Elicited with the SLIP Technique , 2007, Language and speech.

[19]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  The organization of perception and action. A theory for language and other cognitive skills , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[20]  Michèle Pettinato.  Kids' slips: what young children's slips of the tongue reveal about language development. Jeri J. Jaeger. Lawrence Erlbaum, London, Mahwah, NJ, 2005. pp. 752. Price: $145.00, £100.95. ISBN 0805835792 , 2008 .

[21]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The Limited Use of Distinctive Features and Markedness in Speech Production: Evidence from Speech Error Data. , 1979 .

[22]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Towards an articulatory phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[23]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[24]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Phonological Segments and Features as Planning Units in Speech Production , 1999 .

[25]  J. Stemberger.  Apparent anti-frequency effects in language production: The Addition Bias and phonological underspecification☆ , 1991 .

[26]  Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al.  The lexicon in a model of language production , 1985 .

[27]  W CROTT,et al.  [Development of speech]. , 1955, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.

[28]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[29]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  Forward and backward masking in motor systems , 1969, Kybernetik.

[31]  Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al.  The Reliability and Replicability of Naturalistic Speech Error Data A Comparison with Experimentally Induced Errors , 1992 .

[32]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Serial Control of Phonology in Speech Production: A Hierarchical Model , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Positive Feedback in Hierarchical Connectionist Models: Applications to Language Production , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  G. Dell,et al.  Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model. , 1997, Psychological review.

[35]  Joseph John Kupin,et al.  Tongue twisters as a source of information about speech production , 1982 .

[36]  Hans-Georg Bosshardt.  Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivationsflußmodell , 1989 .

[37]  Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al.  Neighbourhood effects on error rates in speech production , 2004, Brain and Language.

[38]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data , 1981 .