Monitoring quality of care in nursing homes and making information available for the general public: state of the art.

OBJECTIVE To improve quality of care, nursing homes need to assess and monitor their performance. This study aims to gain insight in the availability and contents of publicly accessible quality systems in northwestern Europe and the USA. METHODS This study employed a systematic search consisting of searching bibliographic sources from 2005 to September 2009, personal communication with experts, a conventional internet search, and hand-searching of references. RESULTS Ten out of the 14 included countries use a quality systems. There is a large variety in type and number of indicators assessed. In general more attention is paid to the assessment of structure and process indicators, compared to outcome indicators. The countries differ in the way the results are made available to the general public. CONCLUSION It can be concluded that monitoring and publicizing data on quality of care in nursing homes is becoming increasingly widespread. However, the systems still need further development and refinement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The systems need to be further developed regarding validity and reliability. Furthermore, the uniformity of the systems should be increased, more attention must be paid to the assessment of patient satisfaction, and additional insight must be gained in the user-friendliness of the systems.

[1]  J. Hamers,et al.  Reporting quality of nursing home care by an internet report card. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[2]  Vincent Mor,et al.  The quality of quality measurement in U.S. nursing homes. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[3]  R. Baier,et al.  Aiming for star performance: the relationship between setting targets and improved nursing home quality of care. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[4]  A. Seim,et al.  Nursing sensitive quality indicators for nursing home care: international review of literature, policy and practice. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[5]  D. Berwick A user's manual for the IOM's 'Quality Chasm' report. , 2002, Health affairs.

[6]  S. Simmons,et al.  The Minimum Data Set Urinary Incontinence Quality Indicators: Do They Reflect Differences in Care Processes Related to Incontinence? , 2003, Medical care.

[7]  P. Rochon,et al.  Nursing Home Profit Status and Quality of Care: Is There Any Evidence of an Association? , 2005, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[8]  R. Kane,et al.  Future development of nursing home quality indicators. , 2005, The Gerontologist.

[9]  K. Engedal,et al.  Quality of care in Norwegian nursing homes--deficiencies and their correlates. , 2008, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[10]  Jeremy Hurst,et al.  Health Care Quality Indicators Project: Conceptual Framework Paper , 2006 .

[11]  A. Donabedian An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care , 2002 .

[12]  R. Kane,et al.  Resident and Family Perspectives on Assisted Living , 2006, Journal of Aging & Social Policy.

[13]  G. S. Wunderlich,et al.  Improving the Quality of Long-Term Care , 2001 .

[14]  J. Cohen-Mansfield,et al.  Physicians' perceptions of care in the nursing home and of strategies for improvement in a survey on treatment of behavior problems. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[15]  J. Gladman,et al.  Care home medicine in the UK--in from the cold. , 2008, Age and ageing.

[16]  S. Davies,et al.  Supporting quality improvement in care homes for older people: the contribution of primary care nurses. , 2008, Journal of nursing management.

[17]  David Newman,et al.  Testing Consumers' Comprehension of Quality Measures Using Alternative Reporting Formats , 2007, Health care financing review.