Facial recognition from DNA using face-to-DNA classifiers

Facial recognition from DNA refers to the identification or verification of unidentified biological material against facial images with known identity. One approach to establish the identity of unidentified biological material is to predict the face from DNA, and subsequently to match against facial images. However, DNA phenotyping of the human face remains challenging. Here, another proof of concept to biometric authentication is established by using multiple face-to-DNA classifiers, each classifying given faces by a DNA-encoded aspect (sex, genomic background, individual genetic loci), or by a DNA-inferred aspect (BMI, age). Face-to-DNA classifiers on distinct DNA aspects are fused into one matching score for any given face against DNA. In a globally diverse, and subsequently in a homogeneous cohort, we demonstrate preliminary, but substantial true (83%, 80%) over false (17%, 20%) matching in verification mode. Consequences of future efforts include forensic applications, necessitating careful consideration of ethical and legal implications for privacy in genomic databases.Prediction of face from DNA followed by matching to facial images has been proposed for forensic applications. Here, Sero et al. present a different approach that can establish facial identity from DNA without directly predicting the face but is based on classifying given faces by individual DNA-encoded traits.

[1]  Karen L Edwards,et al.  A comparison of views regarding the use of de-identified data. , 2018, Translational behavioral medicine.

[2]  Andrea F. Abate,et al.  2D and 3D face recognition: A survey , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Kimberly N. Brown Anonymity, Faceprints, and the Constitution , 2014 .

[4]  Georgios Tzimiropoulos,et al.  Large Pose 3D Face Reconstruction from a Single Image via Direct Volumetric CNN Regression , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[5]  Nila A. Sathe,et al.  A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States , 2018, PLoS ONE.

[6]  Eun Yong Kang,et al.  Identification of individuals by trait prediction using whole-genome sequencing data , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Amy L. McGuire,et al.  Genealogy databases and the future of criminal investigation , 2018, Science.

[8]  Helena Machado,et al.  Public participation in genetic databases: crossing the boundaries between biobanks and forensic DNA databases through the principle of solidarity , 2015, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[9]  C. McCormick,et al.  Facial Structure Predicts Sexual Orientation in Both Men and Women , 2015, Archives of sexual behavior.

[10]  Arun Ross,et al.  What Else Does Your Biometric Data Reveal? A Survey on Soft Biometrics , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[11]  Erin Murphy,et al.  Relative Doubt: Familial Searches of DNA Databases , 2009 .

[12]  Yaniv Erlich Major flaws in “Identification of individuals by trait prediction using whole-genome sequencing data” , 2017 .

[13]  Arvind Narayanan,et al.  Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases , 2016, Science.

[14]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Genomics and Privacy: Implications of the New Reality of Closed Data for the Field , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Elizabeth E. Joh Privacy Protests: Surveillance Evasion and Fourth Amendment Suspicion , 2013 .

[16]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Morphological Integration and Developmental Modularity , 2008 .

[17]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A Comparative Study of 3-D Face Recognition Under Expression Variations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[18]  Cinnamon S Bloss Does family always matter? Public genomes and their effect on relatives , 2013, Genome Medicine.

[19]  Misha Angrist,et al.  Personal genomes in progress: from the Human Genome Project to the Personal Genome Project , 2010, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[20]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Comparison of human and computer performance across face recognition experiments , 2014, Image and Vision Computing.

[21]  Mohamed Daoudi,et al.  Joint gender, ethnicity and age estimation from 3D faces: An experimental illustration of their correlations , 2017, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  David Gusella No Cilia Left Behind: Analyzing the Privacy Rights in Routinely Shed DNA Found at Crime Scenes , 2013 .

[23]  A. F. Adams,et al.  The Survey , 2021, Dyslexia in Higher Education.

[24]  Urs Gasser,et al.  Between Openness and Privacy in Genomics , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[25]  Peter Claes,et al.  Toward DNA-based facial composites: preliminary results and validation. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[26]  John Novembre,et al.  The Population Reference Sample, POPRES: a resource for population, disease, and pharmacological genetics research. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  Matthew Q. Hill,et al.  Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  R. J. Mitchell,et al.  The Genographic Project Public Participation Mitochondrial DNA Database , 2007, PLoS Genetics.

[29]  Lutz Roewer,et al.  DNA fingerprinting in forensics: past, present, future , 2013, Investigative Genetics.

[30]  Richard A. Gibbs,et al.  Open Access Data Sharing in Genomic Research , 2014, Genes.

[31]  Yaniv Erlich,et al.  Re-identification of genomic data using long range familial searches , 2018, bioRxiv.

[32]  Peter Claes,et al.  Exploring the Underlying Genetics of Craniofacial Morphology through Various Sources of Knowledge , 2016, BioMed research international.

[33]  Michael Monajemi,et al.  Privacy Regulation in the Age of Biometrics That Deal With a New World Order of Information , 2018 .

[34]  M. Wjst,et al.  The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper , 2017, Journal of Community Genetics.

[35]  Adam R. Pearlman,et al.  National Security, Narcissism, Voyeurism, and Kyllo: How Intelligence Programs and Social Norms are Affecting the Fourth Amendment , 2015 .

[36]  Jessica Gabel Cino Deploying the Secret Police: The Use of Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System , 2018 .

[37]  Brandon L. Garrett The Crime Lab in the Age of the Genetic Panopticon (Book Review) , 2017 .

[38]  Eric D Green,et al.  The Complexities of Genomic Identifiability , 2013, Science.

[39]  David J. Werrett,et al.  Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’ , 1985, Nature.

[40]  Jean-Luc Dugelay,et al.  FIRE: Fast Iris REcognition on mobile phones by combining colour and texture features , 2017, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[41]  Chen Wang,et al.  Local circular patterns for multi-modal facial gender and ethnicity classification , 2014, Image Vis. Comput..

[42]  Claudia Cuador,et al.  From Street Photography To Face Recognition: Distinguishing Between The Right To Be Seen And The Right To Be Recognized , 2017 .

[43]  Ric Simmons,et al.  Quantifying Criminal Procedure: How to Unlock the Potential of Big Data in Our Criminal Justice System , 2016 .

[44]  Jessica Gabel Cino Tackling Technical Debt: Managing Advances in DNA Technology thatOutpace the Evolution of Law , 2016 .

[45]  Nita A. Farahany,et al.  Redefining Genomic Privacy: Trust and Empowerment , 2014, bioRxiv.

[46]  Erin Murphy Familial searches of DNA databases , 2013 .

[47]  Andrew Guthrie Ferguson Personal Curtilage: Fourth Amendment Security in Public , 2013 .

[48]  Xintao Wu,et al.  An overview of human genetic privacy , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Bert-Jaap Koops,et al.  Forensic DNA Phenotyping: Regulatory Issues , 2006 .

[50]  Wendy A. Wolf,et al.  Broad data sharing in genetic research: views of institutional review board professionals. , 2011, IRB.

[51]  Manfred Kayser,et al.  Forensic DNA Phenotyping: Predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[52]  A. McGuire Identifiability of DNA Data: The Need for Consistent Federal Policy , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[53]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Sex Classification is Better with Three-Dimensional Head Structure Than with Image Intensity Information , 1997, Perception.

[54]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  A global reference for human genetic variation , 2015, Nature.

[55]  Angelica Carrero Biometrics and Federal Databases: Could You Be In It?, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 589 (2018) , 2018 .

[56]  Carra Pope Biometric Data Collection in an Unprotected World: Exploring the Need for Federal Legislation Protecting Biometric Data , 2018 .

[57]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Face Recognition Performance: Role of Demographic Information , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[58]  Shuang Wang,et al.  Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Kirsten Dedrickson,et al.  Universal DNA databases: a way to improve privacy? , 2017, Journal of law and the biosciences.

[60]  Charles E. MacLean Creating a Wanted Poster from a Drop of Blood: Using DNA Phenotyping to Generate an Artist's Rendering of an Offender Based Only on DNA Shed at the Crime Scene , 2013 .

[61]  Mariko Hirose,et al.  Privacy in Public Spaces: The Reasonable Expectation of Privacy against the Dragnet Use of Facial Recognition Technology , 2017 .

[62]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  A community effort to protect genomic data sharing, collaboration and outsourcing , 2017, npj Genomic Medicine.

[63]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of global-to-local genetic effects on human facial shape , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[64]  R. Manfredini,et al.  Unravelling the Complexity of Inherited Retinal Dystrophies Molecular Testing: Added Value of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing , 2016, BioMed research international.

[65]  Yaniv Erlich,et al.  Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[66]  M. Angrist Eyes wide open: the personal genome project, citizen science and veracity in informed consent. , 2009, Personalized medicine.

[67]  Samuel D. Hodge Current Controversies in the Use of DNA in Forensic Investigations , 2018 .

[68]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[69]  David Alan Sklansky Two More Ways Not to Think About Privacy and the Fourth Amendment , 2014 .

[70]  Omid Ekrami,et al.  MeshMonk: Open-source large-scale intensive 3D phenotyping , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[71]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Genetically Predicted Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Risk: Mendelian Randomization Analyses of Data from 145,000 Women of European Descent , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[72]  Jennifer K. Wagner DNA, Racial Disparities, and Biases in Criminal Justice: Searching for Solutions , 2016 .

[73]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome‐wide association studies , 2010, Genetic epidemiology.

[74]  Peter Claes,et al.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[75]  Wayne A. Logan Policing Police Access to Criminal Justice Data , 2018 .

[76]  Peter M Schneider,et al.  DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[77]  Christine Guest DNA and Law Enforcement: How the Use of Open Source DNA Databases Violates Privacy Rights , 2019 .

[78]  David H. Kaye,et al.  DNA Identification Databases: Legality, Legitimacy, and the Case for Population-Wide Coverage , 2003 .

[79]  Lan Hu,et al.  A novel strategy for forensic age prediction by DNA methylation and support vector regression model , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[80]  Nicol Turner Lee,et al.  Detecting racial bias in algorithms and machine learning , 2018, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[81]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[82]  C. Fisher,et al.  Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science , 2018, Prevention Science.

[83]  Robert G. Athearn,et al.  DNA WITHOUT WARRANT : DECODING PRIVACY , PROBABLE CAUSE AND PERSONHOOD , 2015 .

[84]  Toshihiro Tanaka The International HapMap Project , 2003, Nature.

[85]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[86]  Alena Buyx,et al.  A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks. , 2013, Medical law review.

[87]  Robert Cook-Deegan,et al.  Beyond Our Borders? Public Resistance to Global Genomic Data Sharing , 2016, PLoS biology.

[88]  E Barker,et al.  Searching for solutions. , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.

[89]  Mildred K Cho,et al.  Forensic genetics and ethical, legal and social implications beyond the clinic , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[90]  Colin Camerer : Past , Present , Future , 2003 .

[91]  Emily Berman,et al.  A Government of Laws and Not of Machines , 2018 .

[92]  G. Church,et al.  From genetic privacy to open consent , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[93]  A. Michael Froomkin Regulating Mass Surveillance as Privacy Pollution: Learning from Environmental Impact Statements , 2015 .

[94]  J. Molinuevo,et al.  Regulatory issues , 2000, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[95]  Natalie Ram,et al.  DNA by the Entirety , 2015 .

[96]  Phillip Atiba Goff,et al.  Racial Bias in Policing: Why We Know Less Than We Should , 2012 .

[97]  Andrew Guthrie Ferguson,et al.  Big Data and Predictive Reasonable Suspicion , 2014 .

[98]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Face Challenge Problem , 2012, Image and Vision Computing.

[99]  Jane Kaye,et al.  Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a “Dynamic Consent” Approach , 2018, Front. Public Health.