Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices

Three studies examined the role of habit on information acquisition concerning travel mode choices. On the basis of Triandis’ (1980) model of attitude‐behaviour relations it was expected that habit strength attenuates the elaborateness of choice processes. The studies focused on different phases in the choice process, namely the appreciation of situational cues and appreciation of choice option information. In line with expectations, it was found that, compared to weak habit participants, those who had a strong habit towards choosing a particular travel mode acquired less information and gave evidence of less elaborate choice strategies. It was attempted to break effects of habit by manipulating either accountability demands or level of attention. Although accountability demands raised the level of information acquisition, no interactions with habit were found. Enhanced attention to the choice process initially did override habit effects in a series of choice trials. However, in spite of this manipulation, chronic habit effects emerged during later trials. The results demonstrate the profound effects that habit may have on the appreciation of information about choice situations and choice options. #1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Habit versus planned behaviour: a field experiment. , 1998, The British journal of social psychology.

[2]  Michael A. Becker.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[3]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit and information use in travel mode choices , 1997 .

[4]  B. van den Putte,et al.  A comparison of behavioural alternative models in the context of the theory of reasoned action , 1996 .

[5]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. , 1996 .

[6]  H. Aarts,et al.  Habit and decision making: the case of travel mode choice , 1996 .

[7]  R. Pieters,et al.  Intention-behaviour consistency: Effects of consideration set size, involvement and need for cognition , 1995 .

[8]  B. Verplanken,et al.  ATTITUDE VERSUS GENERAL HABIT -- ANTECEDENTS OF TRAVEL MODE CHOICE / , 1994 .

[9]  Judith M. Tanur,et al.  Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys , 1993 .

[10]  M.J.W. Stokmans.  Analyzing information search patterns to test the use of a two-phased decision strategy , 1992 .

[11]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors , 1992 .

[12]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Personal Recall and the Limits of Retrospective Questions in Surveys , 1992 .

[13]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[14]  S. Taplin,et al.  A test of an expanded theory of reasoned action to predict mammography participation. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[15]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[16]  D. Ronis,et al.  Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. , 1989 .

[17]  J. Bargh.  Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[18]  Ellen J. Langer,et al.  Minding Matters: The Consequences of Mindlessness–Mindfulness , 1989 .

[19]  P. Callero,et al.  Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior , 1988 .

[20]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[21]  Banwari Mittal.  Achieving Higher Seat Belt Usage: The Role of Habit in Bridging the Attitude‐Behavior Gap1 , 1988 .

[22]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[23]  David Mazursky,et al.  New directions in behavioral process research: Implications for social psychology , 1987 .

[24]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[25]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[26]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[27]  R. Bagozzi.  Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. , 1981 .

[28]  R. Abelson.  Psychological status of the script concept. , 1981 .

[29]  James Jaccard,et al.  Atttudes and behavior: Implications of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives , 1981 .

[30]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .

[31]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[32]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[33]  H C Triandis,et al.  Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[34]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[35]  P. Bentler,et al.  Models of attitude–behavior relations. , 1979 .

[36]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[37]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[39]  I. Ajzen,et al.  The Prediction of Behavioral Intentions in a Choice Situation. , 1969 .

[40]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .

[41]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[42]  C. L. Hull.  Principles of behavior : an introduction to behavior theory , 1943 .

[43]  W. James.  The principles of psychology , 1983 .