BACKGROUND
Periprocedural providers are encountering more patients with code status limitations (CSLs) regarding their preferences for resuscitation and life-sustaining treatment who choose to undergo palliative procedures. Surgical and anesthesia guidelines for preprocedural reconsideration of CSLs have been available for several years, but it is not known whether they are being followed in practice.
OBJECTIVE
We assessed compliance with existing guidelines for patients undergoing venting gastrostomy tube (VGT) for malignant bowel obstruction (MBO), serving as an example of a palliative procedure received by patients near the end of life.
DESIGN
Code status was determined at admission and throughout the hospitalization by chart review. Documentation of code status discussions (CSDs) was identified from provider notes and compared with existing guidelines.
SETTING/SUBJECTS
An institutional database retrospectively identified patients who underwent VGT placement for MBO at two academic hospitals (2014-2015).
MEASUREMENTS
We identified 53 patients who underwent VGT placement for MBO. Interventional radiologists performed 88% of these procedures. Other periprocedural providers involved in these cases included surgeons, gastroenterologists, anesthesiologists, and sedation nurses.
RESULTS
CSLs were documented before the procedure in only 43% of cases, and a documented CSD with a periprocedural provider was identified in only 22% of CSL cases. Of all VGT placements performed in patients with CSLs before the procedure, only 13% were compliant with the guidelines of preprocedural reconsideration of CSLs.
CONCLUSIONS
Increased compliance with guidelines published by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the American College of Surgeons, and the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses is necessary to ensure goal-concordant care of patients with CSLs who undergo a procedure. Efforts should be made to incorporate these guidelines into the training of all periprocedural providers.
[1]
A. Bader,et al.
Training Surgeons and Anesthesiologists to Facilitate End-of-Life Conversations With Patients and Families: A Systematic Review of Existing Educational Models.
,
2017,
Journal of surgical education.
[2]
A. Columbus,et al.
Inferring Palliative Intent From Administrative Data: Validation of a Claims-Based Case Definition for Venting Gastrostomy Tube.
,
2017,
Journal of pain and symptom management.
[3]
Zara Cooper,et al.
Using a Palliative Care Framework for Seriously Ill Surgical Patients: The Example of Malignant Bowel Obstruction.
,
2016,
JAMA surgery.
[4]
M. Keegan,et al.
Patient and doctor attitudes and beliefs concerning perioperative do not resuscitate orders: anesthesiologists’ growing compliance with patient autonomy and self determination guidelines
,
2013,
BMC Anesthesiology.
[5]
M. Fetters,et al.
Hospital Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Why They Have Failed and How to Fix Them
,
2011,
Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[6]
R. Truog,et al.
DNR in the OR: a goal-directed approach.
,
1999,
Anesthesiology.