CAREERS, COMMUNITIES, AND INDUSTRY EVOLUTION: LINKS TO COMPLEXITY THEORY

Traditional views of industry evolution focus on the company as their principal unit of analysis. We offer an alternative view that links between workers' careers and successive community, company and industry effects. We apply this view to evidence from independent film-making, and suggest a conception of the career, involving three "ways of knowing", to underlie these links. We next explore two more industry examples, the New Zealand boat building industry and the Linux operating system in the software industry, which provide further support for the alternative view proposed, as well as extending it to consider the influence of the World Wide Web. We see all three industry examples as illustrating a range of ideas in complexity theory. We propose that a career-centric view provides a useful basis for the further exploration and application of complexity theory to industrial life.

[1]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[2]  W. Boeker.  Executive Migration and Strategic Change: The Effect of Top Manager Movement on Product-Market Entry , 1997 .

[3]  Michael B. Arthur,et al.  The New Careers: Individual Action and Economic Change , 1999 .

[4]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  A COMPLEX SYSTEMS APPROACH TO LEARNING IN ADAPTIVE NETWORKS , 2001 .

[5]  Philip H. Mirvis.  Crossroads---“Soul Work” in Organizations , 1997 .

[6]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach , 2003 .

[7]  Paul Cilliers,et al.  Complexity and Postmodernism , 1998 .

[8]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[9]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[10]  Peter Maskell,et al.  KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND DIFFUSION IN GEOGRAPHIC CLUSTERS , 2001 .

[11]  Paul Cilliers,et al.  Boundaries, Hierarchies and Networks in Complex Systems , 2001 .

[12]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits , 1986 .

[13]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[14]  Ko Kuwabara,et al.  Linux: A Bazaar at the Edge of Chaos , 2000, First Monday.

[15]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[16]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[17]  S. Pinch,et al.  Discursive Aspects of Technological Innovation: The Case of the British Motor-Sport Industry , 1999 .

[18]  B. McKelvey.  ENERGISING ORDER-CREATING NETWORKS OF DISTRIBUTED INTELLIGENCE: IMPROVING THE CORPORATE BRAIN , 2001 .

[19]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  The Individualized Corporation , 1997 .

[20]  W. Powell.  Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[21]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Red Hat and the Linux Revolution , 1999 .

[22]  R. Hall.  The strategic analysis of intangible resources , 1992 .

[23]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[24]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[25]  Harold L. Wilensky,et al.  Orderly careers and social participation: The impact of work history on social integration in the middle mass. , 1961 .

[26]  M. Arthur,et al.  Paradox in Project-Based Enterprise: The Case of Film Making , 1998 .

[27]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Nation States and Economic Development:From National Systems of Production to National Systems of Knowledge Creation and Learning , 2000 .

[28]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .